Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So. They got to Rachel. (Original Post) Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2013 OP
What? Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #1
Who's "they," and how did they get her? ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #2
the Trilateral Commission and the Evil Bush Empire BainsBane Apr 2013 #27
Rachel Magillicuty? No, I saw her. She's fine. randome Apr 2013 #3
No, the OTHER Rachel Magillicuty Nevernose Apr 2013 #6
I'm like that sometimes. I apologize for not contributing to this excellent thread. randome Apr 2013 #7
What's Congress's number? I'll call them right fucking now. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2013 #4
The number is Six, Six, Six. randome Apr 2013 #9
That's the finish line address , 666 Boylston St. jakeXT Apr 2013 #41
No one is in your head but you. What are you talking about? (nt) nessa Apr 2013 #5
Come on...you knew your abbreviated/cryptic headline would lead to these responses PearliePoo2 Apr 2013 #8
OP's been updated for some additional degree of clarity, folks. Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2013 #10
what about the torches? Phillip McCleod Apr 2013 #12
Gidney that's the way computers are. You can't always read people as well as when mucifer Apr 2013 #11
I really should know better after all these years (re both joking in GD and the Cubbies) Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2013 #13
Trying to joke in GD sharp_stick Apr 2013 #15
It was a good segment. frogmarch Apr 2013 #14
my letter to Rachael: rainy Apr 2013 #16
I lost respect for Rachael Maddow tonight ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2013 #19
She doesn't believe in 9/11 being done by the government on purpose. Jennicut Apr 2013 #38
This is exactly why I am always disappointed to see threads here making fun of conspiracy Samantha Apr 2013 #23
I would suggest that you read one of the books reccomended Mopar151 Apr 2013 #32
You are right marions ghost Apr 2013 #33
Oh god not this crap again TrogL Apr 2013 #34
Ah, yes, the realistic "other" theories. Dr. Strange Apr 2013 #37
you forget to sign it with Truthy to Power! snooper2 Apr 2013 #39
Liz Warren coming up after the break pinboy3niner Apr 2013 #17
We'll see... we'll see... Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2013 #18
That was really messy! peace13 Apr 2013 #21
Wow she has lost it! peace13 Apr 2013 #20
It would be great to see Rachel, Rev. Al, Tweety, Chris, Lawrence... Oilwellian Apr 2013 #22
Rachel is looking out for Rachel CrawlingChaos Apr 2013 #24
OK, found a video of this dung heap CrawlingChaos Apr 2013 #25
I just watched the segment Summer Hathaway Apr 2013 #28
There was some low some high. napoleon_in_rags Apr 2013 #30
Yes, she forgot that the 911 commission was a farce...... peace13 Apr 2013 #35
Exactly. To conflate those with questions about 9/11 with people who deny that Aurora and forestpath Apr 2013 #40
Skepticism should not be mistaken for delusion. Those prone to denial invite delusion. gordianot Apr 2013 #26
It was a good segment, but I disagree that Lil Missy Apr 2013 #29
You would be surprised how many 'kooks' are out there. peace13 Apr 2013 #42
Unbelievable people could believe the government jambo101 Apr 2013 #31
I think I watched her for the last time last night. Myrina Apr 2013 #36
We join you in the frustration. peace13 Apr 2013 #43
This is so true. zeeland Apr 2013 #44
Here is the contact info for the show. peace13 Apr 2013 #45
I think what MSNBC does every day could be condenced into a half hour show (26 minutes ) olddots Apr 2013 #46
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. Rachel Magillicuty? No, I saw her. She's fine.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:20 PM
Apr 2013

But she wants her bracelet back. Look in the sofa cushions.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
8. Come on...you knew your abbreviated/cryptic headline would lead to these responses
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:24 PM
Apr 2013

Why are you doing this crap?

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,819 posts)
10. OP's been updated for some additional degree of clarity, folks.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:26 PM
Apr 2013

I apologize for my sometimes twisted sense of humor.
Please lower your pitchforks.

 

Phillip McCleod

(1,837 posts)
12. what about the torches?
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:28 PM
Apr 2013

do we have to lower those too?

..

geeze.. and here i was all dolled up and ready to par-TAY!

mucifer

(23,478 posts)
11. Gidney that's the way computers are. You can't always read people as well as when
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:28 PM
Apr 2013

you talk with them. You just confused us. No worries.

BTW poor cubbies not doing so well again.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
15. Trying to joke in GD
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:41 PM
Apr 2013

is an affliction many of us have but I think it can be cured with intensive therapy. The Cubbies....sorry, nothing can help there.

frogmarch

(12,153 posts)
14. It was a good segment.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:40 PM
Apr 2013

For anyone who didn't catch Rachel Maddow's show, her first guest was Alice Hoagland, mother of Mark Bingham, who was killed on United flight 93 on 9/11. Ms. Hoagland talked about an accidental meet-up she once had with 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and expressed her disdain for conspiracy theories in general.

rainy

(6,088 posts)
16. my letter to Rachael:
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 09:42 PM
Apr 2013

message for Rachael Maddow:
It's a big mistake to lump all "conspiracy" theories together and especially ALL the different ones associated with 911. To believe the official story is worse than the realistic "other" theories. The real thing to do is to ask, not conspire, but ask pertinent questions such as why did building 7 fall after only being hit with debris from another burning building and why did all of the buildings fall at free-fall speed? You can ask these questions without making up your own theory. There is a group that is actually asking the physics questions. The group is made up of dozens of educated architects and physicists. Not all "conspiracies" are the same and you should know that.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
19. I lost respect for Rachael Maddow tonight
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:24 PM
Apr 2013

There are lots of well-educated, rational, people who are skeptical of the official reasons given for the collapse of the Twin Towers, as well as Building 7, and lumping us all in with all "conspiracy nuts" is quite disappointing, especially coming from her.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
38. She doesn't believe in 9/11 being done by the government on purpose.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 09:46 AM
Apr 2013

That is not a shocking idea, lots of people don't believe in the 9/11 Truther movement.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
23. This is exactly why I am always disappointed to see threads here making fun of conspiracy
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 12:56 AM
Apr 2013

theorists. All conspiracy theorists should not be lumped together into a single group. The reason why there are so many is due to the fact it has been proven in the past our Government is quite capable of participating in a conspiracy. I am going to choose a safe example to prove my point: Watergate.

Sam

Mopar151

(9,974 posts)
32. I would suggest that you read one of the books reccomended
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 04:40 AM
Apr 2013

Specifically, the Popular Mechanics book debunking many of the conspiracy theories. Perhaps some of the answers you seek are already in there.

As to architechts and physicists, I am well acquainted with both. Architechts are half-fast engineers ( I say this with love ), but much of their training has to do with human factors and regulatory issues. Physicists - most of the ones I've run into have to keep telling you how smart they are, and they are a poor substitute for an engineer.

Finally - Anyone who beleives in wide-ranging, airtight criminal conspiracies has never been in an illicit conspiracy.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
33. You are right
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 05:06 AM
Apr 2013

those questions have never been answered and are conveniently ignored as CT.

Why and how did the buildings fall? Professionals in commercial construction can't explain it except as controlled demolition.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
20. Wow she has lost it!
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:41 PM
Apr 2013

Did she bother to ask the sane 911 families what they thought of the 911 commission and report? I Thought she was intelligent but no more. That was the most ignorant show I have ever seen. Even Rush knows he's being an ass for money. What the heck do they have on Rachel that would cause her to embarrass herself like that.

I am done with her!

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
22. It would be great to see Rachel, Rev. Al, Tweety, Chris, Lawrence...
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 10:58 PM
Apr 2013

any of the Third Way mouthpieces interview Sibel Edmunds.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
24. Rachel is looking out for Rachel
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 02:31 AM
Apr 2013

Conflating crackpot theories about Boston with wholly justified skepticism of the ludicrous government version of 9/11 is irrational, plain and simple. But for someone in her position to even hint at such a thing would be career-damaging, if not career-ending. I have no respect for her, but then I have no respect for any of the prominent TV talking heads.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
25. OK, found a video of this dung heap
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 03:01 AM
Apr 2013


Wow, worse than I thought. She starts out with a lengthy and gushing infomercial for the 9/11 Commission Report (and it's companion comic book, which she just looooves) and the infamously imbecilic Popular Mechanics 9/11 debunking book. The 9/11 Commission Report for crissakes. A work of BushCo fiction whose own commissioners declared they were "set up to fail". But Rachel wants to assure you that the Bushies served up nothing but truthfulness. And if you don't accept that, she clearly implies that you're on par with kooks who deny that the Aurora and Sandy Hook shootings ever happened? Disgusting.

I didn't make it all the way through - making me too angry - so I didn't see Mark Bingham's mother. Presumably Rachel thumbs her nose at the very large number of 9/11 families who aren't willing to quietly swallow the BS and demand a real investigation. She's essentially calling them kooks? But not to their faces, I'm sure, because I doubt she'd ever allow them on her show.

napoleon_in_rags

(3,991 posts)
30. There was some low some high.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 04:10 AM
Apr 2013

Yeah, even the conspiracy community calls the "no one died at Sandy Hook" crowd insane, and they post pictures of vague celebrity look-alikes in the crowd as evidence of "actors". Its pure insanity. At the same time, 70% of the population believes in Kennedy Assassination cover-ups. Conspiracy is a crime, on the books. Its on the books for a reason. All the 20's mafia guys were involved in incredibly well documented criminal conspiracies for instance so you really have to take the whole spectrum in.

But when she bashes the politicization of it by main stream players, I think she's on the right track. I think both parties should leave it alone. Its amazing they don't, I can't imagine the Republicans wanting their brand tied to rants about UFOs and psychic dreams... but also the right has an emerging dialectic, between Rove on one hand and the Paul (more conspiracy oriented) side on the other - and dialectics are appealing, one wants to identify with one side or the other. The more intense the dialectic, the moreso.

She's almost tottering on the edge of a trap. The knee jerk reaction to conspiracy theories is to scream at them all... To scream "there are no conspiracies already!" But that's basically tantamount to saying "creepy things don't happen". Betting the validity of your arguments on the assertion that creepy things don't happen is a bad bet, especially when you are sitting across the table from these folks.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
35. Yes, she forgot that the 911 commission was a farce......
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 09:23 AM
Apr 2013

....And that many 911 families spoke out against the commission at that time, also, the attitude of the mother of the victim was totally bizarre. Both of the them mocked anyone who did not gobble the entire message hook line and sinker! Yes the commission was so efficient they even made a comic book! What an insult to the seriousness of the topic.

We have been noticing that Rachel's style has really changed over the past year. She repeats and talks like she is speaking to idiots. We can't really watch her on a regular basis. I have emailed my observations to her but ...no response.

I have been meaning to go back and watch an old sow to compare just how far she has gone. I felt sad when I watched this last night. We have really lost am observer and gained nothing. So sad!

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
40. Exactly. To conflate those with questions about 9/11 with people who deny that Aurora and
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 09:55 AM
Apr 2013

Sandy Hook ever happened is not only bad and very lazy "journalism," but just downright unethical.

Rachel showed her true colors when she gave Cory Booker a national platform to dig himself out of the hole he'd dug himself into.

I'm not surprised she's carrying water for a government commission.

gordianot

(15,233 posts)
26. Skepticism should not be mistaken for delusion. Those prone to denial invite delusion.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 03:21 AM
Apr 2013

This works for those who embrace conspiracies and accept convention.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
29. It was a good segment, but I disagree that
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 04:01 AM
Apr 2013

the 911 conspiracy theorists are the same as the Sandy Hook and Aurora conspiracy theorists. I agree they are all kooks, they just aren't the same kooks.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
42. You would be surprised how many 'kooks' are out there.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 03:08 PM
Apr 2013

As far as 911 goes, I would reserve judgment on the kooks. Time will tell. Unfortunately, Rachel has shown what happens with time. People do not remember the particulars and history is rewritten. The 911 commission was pretty much deemed a farce by many 911 families at the time of its work. Now it is up to those people to address this ugly issue again and then again and then again.

I have my doubts about 911 and I would not call myself a kook. Feel free to have your thoughts on the subject. ...I won't call you kooky although my guess is if you were me you would!

jambo101

(797 posts)
31. Unbelievable people could believe the government
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 04:13 AM
Apr 2013

Perpetrated Sandy Hook,9/11,Boston bombings,Aurora etc..
If the government was really out to annihilate its own people wouldnt it be more productive to just nuke all the cities?.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
36. I think I watched her for the last time last night.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 09:28 AM
Apr 2013

11 minutes in and she still hadn't got to the point of the opening topic.
Forward, backward, commercial.
Backward, forward, backward, side-topic, backward, commerical.
Teaser, commerical.
Backward, forward, finally .... GET TO THE FUCKING POINT!


 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
43. We join you in the frustration.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 03:17 PM
Apr 2013

She has lost it in the delivery department and now she disgraces herself with the 911 bull. Using the 911 report as fact while ignoring all of the information that disputed it was pretty unreal. Also, sighting one source in favor of the buildings dropping while disregarding all other reports is pretty irresponsible.

I don't care what her thoughts are on 911, but to lump 911 in with these other attacks is really less than ethical.

We were Rachel's biggest fans, loved her on KO and have watched her show nightly but over the past six months she has become insufferable with just what you described. We have even written her about the problem. finally we have turned her off to save our sanity. If not for DU I would have not seen this. My curiosity was peaked and so we turned in on.

After her ignorance about 911 and professing that folks who think differently than she does are nuts....well, I think we are done too!

zeeland

(247 posts)
44. This is so true.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 03:33 PM
Apr 2013
While I haven't tuned out, the evenings she repeats the exact
same point three or four times makes me crazy.
 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
45. Here is the contact info for the show.
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 03:45 PM
Apr 2013

I finally broke down and called today. For months we have been banging our heads and after last night my head is still shaking!

Lauren Skowronski
Vice President
MSNBC Media Relations
(212) 664-2432
Fax: (212) 703-8578
Project Assignment: "Andrea Mitchell Reports" , "The Ed Show" , "Hardball with Chris Matthews" , "Martin Bashir" , "Morning Joe" , "NOW with Alex Wagner" , " The Rachel Maddow Show" , "The Daily Rundown" , "Early Today" , "Way Too Early"
lauren.skowronski@nbcuni.com

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
46. I think what MSNBC does every day could be condenced into a half hour show (26 minutes )
Thu Apr 25, 2013, 03:59 PM
Apr 2013

as for conspiracies =the only secret is that there is no secret.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So. They got to Rachel.