General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFocusing On Prevention And Neuroscience, President Obama Ends Reagan’s War On Drugs
Drug policy should be rooted in neuroscience, not political science, said Gil Kerikowske, director of the White House Office on National Drug Control Policy.
http://newsone.com/2412446/obama-war-on-drugs/
Finally, after so many years this might change.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)mucifer
(23,521 posts)EOTE
(13,409 posts)This at a time when the DoJ has doubled down on both medical and recreational marijuana use in states where it has been legalized. If the Obama administration were serious about bringing changes to this horrendous awfulness which is the drug war, they'd at least be respecting state laws with regard to drug use. I'm very disappointed in the Obama admin. with regard to drug policy. When I see changes in ACTION rather than just rhetoric, then I'll change my tune. However, I see public pressure on this issue growing so quickly that I think some change might be forced upon the White House before Obama's second term ends.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)This is happening in CA mostly. It's not happening here in Colorado. At least very rarely.
Here's CA's problem:
The refused all regulation. All the MMJ facilities are "non-profit". And while the facilities may actually be "non-profit", the owner are making ridiculous bonuses and salaries. See, they're full of shit. And the feds know it. It's dealers trying to game the system. Not all. But many. So they have caught the eye of the Feds.
Here in Colorado, where we have heaped lots of regulations on ourselves, the raids ARE NOT HAPPENING. We have made an attempt to be as legitimate, law-abiding, and regulated as possible...and the Feds have left us alone. The ONLY raids you see are when someone breaks state laws. See, it's the state LEO's calling the Feds on the dispensary that are blatantly breaking state laws.
So everybody needs to stop with the "Obama is raiding dispensaries". He may be. But it's such a small part of the truth...it's bullshit.
How do I know this? Wife and I and another partner (a GM and part owner at another dispensary) are currently shopping for a turn key dispensary and grow (you MUST own both in CO). In fact, looked at one a couple of hours ago. We've done boatloads of research and spent thousands of dollars getting our business plan, financials and facts all in a row.
Now you've inspired me to make a thread about this so that people stop uttering this "barely truth".
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)It's about time (and I say this as a non-smoker and non-drug user). It should be a no-brainer; just legalize 420 and tax it like alcohol. Let people smoke it in their homes, but not out in public around others.
mucifer
(23,521 posts)How much better we have to just wait and see.
Another article on it.
"Rather, the strategy pursues a 21st century approach to drug policy that balances public health programs, effective law enforcement, and international partnerships. This 'third way' is rooted in the knowledge that drug addiction is a disease of the brain one that can be treated, recovered from, and, most importantly, prevented."
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/administration/295889-obama-seeks-new-approach-to-the-war-on-drugs#ixzz2RQWG3faF
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)What's he doing? Nothing you could notice.
If he stops prosecutions in states that have medical pot, and reschedules it with the DEA, that would indicate he intends to do something.
Frankly, I think Obama is too chicken to deal with drug-enforcement establishment.
--imm
Mopar151
(9,977 posts)Their idea of dialouge is scorched-earth retribution. Look at the history of the ineffective DARE program and you'll see plenty of examples.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)in the budget and the military? Including overseas operations?
'Cause, speaking as someone with good cause to know, other nations are WAY tired of fighting the US's battles on their own territory.
Hekate
(90,616 posts)If it is as you say, this would be a life-changing turn of events for this nation.
dembotoz
(16,796 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)"The cure is worse than the disease," or something to that effect. The reason drugs are illegal? Because they destroy lives, families, and communities (leaving out, for the sake of argument, the Puritanism). And what does criminalizing large swaths of the population and locking up people in the drug trade do? Destroy lives, families, and communities. It's just stupid.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)Hopefully this is a signal to Congress that the executive branch agrees with the bill, submitted on Feb. 5th, to move cannabis from the DEA to the Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco.
http://polis.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=318723
We are in the process of a dramatic shift in the marijuana policy landscape, said Blumenauer. Public attitude, state law, and established practices are all creating irreconcilable difficulties for public officials at every level of government. We want the federal government to be a responsible partner with the rest of the universe of marijuana interests while we address what federal policy should be regarding drug taxation, classification, and legality.
The Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act follows Colorados model of regulating marijuana like alcohol by:
Removing marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act;
Transferring the Drug Enforcement Administrations authority to regulate marijuana to a newly renamed Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Marijuana and Firearms, which will be tasked with regulating marijuana as it currently does alcohol;
Requiring marijuana producers to purchase a permit, as commercial alcohol producers do, of which the proceeds would offset the cost of federal oversight; and,
Ensuring federal law distinguishes between individuals who grow marijuana for personal use and those involved in commercial sale and distribution.
States could choose to continue to prohibit marijuana production or use in their states and it would remain illegal to transport marijuana to a state where it is prohibited.
Cha
(297,029 posts)Organized by rap mogul Russell Simmons, the group voiced its support for drug incarceration reform and added that the time is right to move toward replacing jail sentences with intervention and rehabilitation for non-violent offenders.
Thanks mucifer!
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)a snippet of "The House I Live In" Independent Lens, PBS documentary
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Just last week the Feds came back to so cal and raided several more dispensaries.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]I'm hesitant to applaud just yet.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)That's down slightly from last year, but still in line with the historical 2/3-1/3 split between drug war spending and drug prevention and treatment spending at the federal level.
skydive forever
(443 posts)decayincl
(27 posts)Private Prisons and their lobbies will allow any reduction in incarceration rates or reduction of sentences.
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)The Administration has, for four years, said one thing while doing the exact opposite on this issue. I don't trust the administration's, or the President's, word on much of anything at this point.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I'm with you. They talk a good game about all kinds of things, but when it comes down to crunch time, they bow to the status quo.
markpkessinger
(8,392 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)And I seriously doubt that we are going to see anything of the sort.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)lobby. Now everyone who is busted with pot will get to spend 30 to 90 days in a "voluntary" rehab program.
unrepentant progress
(611 posts)Well, I think it's safe to say Mr. Shepard wasn't a history major. Nixon created the modern "War On Drugs."
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=-5IjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=RLcFAAAAIBAJ&pg=973,31915&dq=nixon+war+on+drugs&hl=en
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)easy does it so that it is done in a good, lasting way.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)That is to say, with an asterisk?