Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Hopeful Sign, EPA Slams State Department for 'Insufficient' KXL Review
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/04/23-2On the final day of the Keystone XL public comment period for the State Department's draft supplementary environmental impact statement (SEIS) of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a sharply critical assessment declaring the analysis "insufficient."
Ruptured Enbridge Pipeline from Kalamazoo Spill,(Photo: NTSB) The EPA's objection is important, as the Washington Post explains, because it "not only provides opponents [of the pipeline] with political ammunition," it could also "force President Obama to directly weigh in on the permitting decision" if the EPA raises similar objections to a possible 'national interest determination' by the State Department.
"As long as no other agency objects," the Post continues, "State can issue a ruling on the pipeline on its own; if EPA challenges the national interest determination the State Department makes at the end of its review process, Obama himself would have to issue the final permit decision."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 758 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Hopeful Sign, EPA Slams State Department for 'Insufficient' KXL Review (Original Post)
ashling
Apr 2013
OP
There will be no ambiguity about where the buck stops if that's the case.`
LiberalAndProud
Apr 2013
#1
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)1. There will be no ambiguity about where the buck stops if that's the case.`
I hope my predictive powers are on the fritz. I am not optimistic that Obama would nix the pipeline if given the opportunity. I hope I'm wrong. I hope for it fervently.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)2. Sadly, I don't think he will, either...nt
newfie11
(8,159 posts)3. I think your both right