General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Real Karl Marx
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/may/09/real-karl-marx/immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The basic idea of evolution by variation and natural selection is solid, but nearly every specific thing Darwin said has been "refined" beyond recognition since then (remember, Darwin had no theory of genetics whatsoever).
Marx is in some ways a worse position. While the notion of an empirical rather than documentary history is still important, the specific form of a phenomenological dialectic of human spirit is so quaint as to not even merit treatment anymore (witness how few students today read that part of his books anymore, despite how central they are to his arguments).
leftstreet
(36,098 posts)In the modern world we don't sell our labor in order to survive
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)by furthering the problem exploitation, labor, and crisis indefinitely.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)I wonder if he meant the commune.
??
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's kind of a shame that people don't read that part of Marx's work anymore, though as the author is pointing out it's basically in a nearly-inaccessible conceptual language. Do you believe in a transcendental dialectic and a phenomenology of the human spirit? Do you even think those are worthwhile concepts? If not, the actual underlying argument of Marx will make no sense to you.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)on cinco de Mayo