Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1097 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warning of this graphic photo gun post (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Apr 2013
OP
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)1. So {for gun fanatics} painfully true. k&R
Blue Owl
(50,291 posts)2. For her sake, I hope that's not Ted Nugent during a draft
n/t
MineralMan
(146,262 posts)3. Alternate caption: "That's it?"
Or, "That's what Mom told me to be afraid of?"
dairydog91
(951 posts)4. Has anyone actually done research on this?
I mean, there's a history of humans belittling the genitals of enemy tribes (i.e. British mockery of the balls of various Nazi leaders), but I'm wondering if there's actual research about gun owners' wangs, or if this is just some Cro-Magnon instinctual belief that your opponents are less virile than the men of your tribe.
Aristus
(66,294 posts)5. I don't know if there's a correlation physically.
But there do seem to be a lot of very insecure men running around with guns.
I've never needed one.
For any reason...