Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:10 PM Apr 2013

Chuck Grassley: How Come It's Okay to Politicize West, TX but Not Boston?


By David Weigel | Posted Monday, April 22, 2013, at 10:47 AM

Today's extended hearing on the immigration bill is about as crowded as you'd expect. Teams of pro-reform activist crowded the Hart Senate Building's second floor hallway before the room opened, then filed in politely to show their enthusiasm with matching shirts. Twenty-three panelists -- three more even than expected last week -- are queued up for testimony. Seventy-two chairs have been provided for media covering the trial; only around 50 of the chairs are occupied. Still! That's plenty.

The robust media presence came in handy when Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Patrick Leahy picked up a theme of the last 96 hours, asking that anyone with thoughts about Boston's bombing and its possible relevance to immigration should keep it to himself.
"Let no one be so cruel as to try to use the heinous acts of two young men last week to derail the dreams and futures of millions of hardworking people," said Leahy. "A nation as strong as ours can welcome the oppressed and persecuted without making compromises on our security."

One of those cruel people was, of course, Judiciary Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley.

"I want you to take note of the fact that when you proposed gun legislation, I didn't accuse you of taking advantage of the Norristown (sic) situation as an excuse," snapped Grassley when he got his chance to respond. "I don't hear any criticism of people when there's 14 people killed in West, Texas, and demanding taking advantage of that tragedy to warn about more government action to make sure that fertilizer factories are safe."

It's a fair comparison, but maybe not for the reasons Grassley made it. The knock on regulators in West wasn't that they were needed and some new bill must be passed to hire them. It was that they hadn't shown up and inspected Adair Grain Inc.’s West Fertilizer Co. since 1985. So far, in Boston, there's no evidence that a new immigration bill would have thwarted the Tsarneav brothers. What we do know that the FBI was watching Tsarnaev in 2011, while he was applying for citizenship, after a "foreign government" flagged him. We might already have had the laws in place to prevent both disasters, but didn't make use of them.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/04/22/chuck_grassley_iowa_senator_asks_why_it_s_okay_to_cite_west_texas_explosion.html?wpisrc=newsletter_jcr:content
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chuck Grassley: How Come It's Okay to Politicize West, TX but Not Boston? (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2013 OP
There's a reason his nickname sharp_stick Apr 2013 #1
Senator Grasshole justhanginon Apr 2013 #2

justhanginon

(3,289 posts)
2. Senator Grasshole
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 12:48 PM
Apr 2013

Senator Chuck Grasshole. Somehow that has a nice ring to it. I may have to steal that one for some of my discussions with conservative friends. Ah yes, more shouting. Gotta love it!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chuck Grassley: How Come ...