Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:29 AM Apr 2013

You know what's better than decisive action? Tough talk, that's what. (McCain & Graham again)

anything to up the ante

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/04/graham-mccain-boston-bomber-enemy-combatant.php
Republicans Urge Obama To Declare Suspected Boston Bomber An ‘Enemy Combatant’

Even before the suspected Boston Marathon bomber was captured Friday night, top GOP lawmakers were urging President Obama not to afford him the constitutional protections of the American criminal justice system. Those calls escalated after his capture, with a growing cadre of Republicans demanding that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev be declared an enemy combatant.

Leading the charge to handle Tsarnaev’s case outside of the Article III courts is Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC), backed by fellow GOP Sens. John McCain (AZ) and Kelly Ayotte (NH) and Rep. Peter King (NY).

“The suspect, based upon his actions, clearly is a good candidate for enemy combatant status. We do not want this suspect to remain silent,” the four Republicans said in a joint statement Saturday. “We continue to face threats from radical Islamists in small cells and large groups throughout the world.”

Graham appeared Saturday on Fox News and labeled Tsarnaev a radical Islamist “on a jihad mission.”


This is worth pushing back on. This is exactly the sort of thing that Obama's inclined to compromise on--using a military tribunal on principle alone (wrong principle), even though civilian courts have a perfect track record on putting away terrorists (a better record than military tribunals, by the way).
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know what's better than decisive action? Tough talk, that's what. (McCain & Graham again) (Original Post) Bucky Apr 2013 OP
if little lindsey was only half as smart as he thinks he is notadmblnd Apr 2013 #1
And Their Proof Is??? KharmaTrain Apr 2013 #2
I know Tamerlan was a citizen, but was Dzhokar also naturalized? Bucky Apr 2013 #6
Retail Level Terror... KharmaTrain Apr 2013 #8
Their core instinct is panic and fear mongering, considering all threat conspiracies. Bucky Apr 2013 #9
We've become accepting of softening up and enhanced interogation... HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #3
Your Muskrat Love torture is horrendous but I can think of worse. gordianot Apr 2013 #4
McCain sounds like he hasn't taken a shit since 2008. Bucky Apr 2013 #10
which version? PD Turk Apr 2013 #5
How about "Proud to be an American" looped over and over and over.... es466 Apr 2013 #7
Good gawd PD Turk Apr 2013 #11

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
1. if little lindsey was only half as smart as he thinks he is
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:46 AM
Apr 2013

he would know that congress passed a law on 2012 that prevents American citizes from being tried by a military tribunal.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
2. And Their Proof Is???
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:50 AM
Apr 2013

...oh that's right, that don't need any, just gin up the hate and poutrage. What a disgrace these goons are to this nation. But then these are also the shitstains that fell hook, line and sinker for Iraq=9/11 and were hoping that there'd be some foreign/Islamic involvement in the bombings so they could climb upon their high horses. Fortunately Tzarnaev will be tried in a civilian court as an AMERICAN citizen should be.

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
6. I know Tamerlan was a citizen, but was Dzhokar also naturalized?
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:11 PM
Apr 2013

He's at least a resident. The status shouldn't matter. We shouldn't politicize the courts either way. They've been able to handle these retail-level terror cases. There is no good reason to throw out the rule of law here. In their hatred and mistrust of America's legal justice system and the rule of law, Republicans are calling for these half-legit, half impromptu military tribunals, as if Boston is still underseige, or partly destroyed by an enemy army.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
8. Retail Level Terror...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:21 PM
Apr 2013

...does sum up what happened last week. While that sounds a bit condescending, I understand it in the context of state-sponsored or an Al-Queda type organization. Again, all we have is sketchy information about the past of these two men and really no motive...no note or video explaining what they did. We may learn more if the surviving Tsarnaev brother decides to speak or through months of investigation by the prosecutors of the forthcoming case but we still have zero indication that either of these brothers were foreign agents or "terrorists". Seems they have more in common with Harris & Kleibold than Mohammed Atta...but the corporate media and a lot of rushpublicans want to look at the surface, apply their broad brushes and play politics.

Cheers...

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
9. Their core instinct is panic and fear mongering, considering all threat conspiracies.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:40 PM
Apr 2013

Republicans have embraced the politics of hysterics... and the base has reacted with apocalyptic thinking on guns vs big brotherism, gold vs economic collapse, and all business regulations leading to socialism.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
3. We've become accepting of softening up and enhanced interogation...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:54 AM
Apr 2013

other than American's basic language deficiencies there's really no need to send him into the Gulag

24/7 exposure to lights and an endless loop of "Muskrat Love" can be done essentially anywhere, just ask Bradley Manning




gordianot

(15,233 posts)
4. Your Muskrat Love torture is horrendous but I can think of worse.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 09:23 AM
Apr 2013

Listening to hours of Graham, or for that matter McCain pontificating would do it to me. Just the snarky tone and lilt of Sarah Palin's voice would push me beyond any stringent physical enhanced interrogation. Tina Fey doing her Palin act would reduce me to a comatose state.

PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
5. which version?
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 09:59 AM
Apr 2013

I think I could hold up for a while if it was the original Willis Alan Ramsey version, but the Captain and Tenille version? Oh man, that's just too wrong

es466

(113 posts)
7. How about "Proud to be an American" looped over and over and over....
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 01:16 PM
Apr 2013

interspersed with Hannity/Palin soundbites?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You know what's better th...