General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRalph Nader on Bush Presidency: He Is Comfortable with Bush’s Inferno
Thanks to Ralph Nader, Gore lost the chance to be president even though he won.
Is Nader comfortable with what he did to world history?
He Is Comfortable with Bushs Inferno
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/04/20-4
President Obama will be at the dedication, continuing to legitimize Mr. Bush, as he did from the outset by announcing in 2009 there would be no investigations or prosecutions of the Bush officials for their crimes.
In an interview with the New York Times, Mr. Bush continued to say he has no regrets about his Presidency. Im comfortable with what I did, ....
still_one
(92,061 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I know he had the right to run but he knew he was hurting Gore and he still went forward with it and look what it got us. You can say with the use of exit polls and and raw vote from 2000 that gore would have won those states without nader on the ballot.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)no one does. Given that Gore is dlc and given that he chose Lieberman has his running mate, is to probable he would have gotten us into Iraq as well. That is the record of the dlc.
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)but yeah, why the fuck did Gore choose Lieberman? Clinton left office with a 65% approval rating. That election should never have been close.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Gore would have made a good president and while Nader was not the only reason he did not become president it is a large reason.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)than he did when in office. Fair weather guy that he seems to be. Many dems opposed the wars when they were seen as Bush wars.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Second you have a point that he was a hawk when he was in office. But he did come out against the war in 2002.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)n/t
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)Btw Nader isn't a member of scotus.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)You don't need much education to do math.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Green voters.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)AND COMMON DREAMS.
Ralph Nader gave us George W. Bush and he has the goddamned motherfucking NERVE to criticize OBAMA for going to the opening of the a presidential library?????????
Fuck Ralph Nader to hell and back.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)...for being a better Dem then most elected Dems.
Hekate
(90,563 posts)Nader used to be worth something. Now he is a smug self-righteous hypocrite who does harm to us all.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)not a democrat. Gore is a conservative democrat. I voted for him, but given what we know now about dlcers, and the third way, I consider it unlikely Gore would have resisted the temptation to get into the Iraq war.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)and there was no real reason to do so.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Obama would never approve of Keystone!
There are many things people believe about dlcers that turn out not to be true.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)equivalency?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)If I'm willing to propose a detail in a budget that does not mean I'm willing to start a war based on lies.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Interesting.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)The greatest example of political dumbfuckery ever.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)and environmental liberals.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)Bush's unaffordable tax cuts plus his war on Iraq, neither of which any sane liberal can safely would have been pursued by Gore, account for half of our $17 trillion debt.
As for the environment, the trade offs are even worse; someone who would have led on climate change and alternative energy vs. an oil industry science denier.
There were profound differences. We lost.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)they controlled both houses and the presidency for a full two years. If these things are so bad, how come they are not different now that the dems have won.
Since Gore stood against the ratifying kyoto protocol as vp, I am skeptical he would have been much of a leader when President.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Fuck Ralph Nader and fuck his vanity candidacy.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 20, 2013, 09:25 PM - Edit history (2)
In other words, Nader isn't comfortable with Bush's inferno but rather, Obama that is comfortable with Bush's inferno.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)Clever, but misleading.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)blue neen
(12,319 posts)Here's a pretty good explanation that I find helpful:
http://homeworktips.about.com/od/mlastyle/a/titles.htm
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Ralph Nader on Bush Presidency
He Is Comfortable with Bushs Inferno
Because she did not click on the link, she, not only didn't realize it was an article written by Nader, but didn't know who "he" was.
That is, Lizzie Poppet thinks that NADER is comfortable with Bush's inferno.
I pointed out that she misread the title, despite the correct punctuation, and made an erroneous assumption.
DerekG
(2,935 posts)You know, if they acted like a progressive opposition party.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)We don't have to cross every line some asshole like Nader draws in the sand with his toe. And we don't have to act like whatever you imagine we should be, either. Nor whatever fucking pipe dream somebody cooked up around the bongo circle during spring break.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,774 posts)(snip)
Ralph Nader is the most arrogant and narcissistic guy I've ever met. I had a meeting with him in the early Nineties. I was jazzed going into the meeting, and I was disgusted leaving. I don't think I've ever met a bigger asshole. If he hadn't run in the last election, we wouldn't be in Iraq and thousands of people wouldn't have died needlessly.
(snip)
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)On a one to one basis and also when communicating with his volunteers. He is also great with kids.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)when the record shows otherwise
Also Lieberman, Gore's running mate ran as an indepedent against the dem when he lost the primary to an antiwar candidate, so that type of dem was not only prowar but prowar to the point to disloyalty to the party base. All the major dlcers campaigned for him, including Obama and Clinton. It is beyond hypocritical to bitch about disloyalty from Nader after that. Nader was never a dem in the first place. Merely liberal.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Blame those that didn't count ALL the ballots. Had they counted ALL the ballots, Gore would have won. Nadar didn't stop the count. It would have been better without him, but Gore lost to theft, not Nadar. The 2000 election was the first theft, the Pentagon next, and 9/11 after that. Stole our vote, our money, our freedom.
I don't care for Nadar, but IMO it was Bush/Cheney who got away with it. What we should have done was to disqualify Florida. Too many fuck ups, and the government of state is loaded with Bush cronies, and brother.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Nader said it didn't matter -- Bush and Gore were Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum. So he helped out Bush -- to show that he could.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)problems would have mattered.
Remove the beam from your own eye.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)but don't bother changing their registration.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)pnwmom
(108,959 posts)They voted for Reagan and, in the national elections anyway, never looked back. (Until recently, when some of the union members have started to vote for Democrats again.)
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)That doesn't seem terribly consistent.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)their own personal vote.
Nader, by insisting on a spot on the California ballot, though many friends and fellow progressives begged him not to run in the swing states, drew the votes of tens of thousands of other progressives.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Either parties own voters or they don't, you can't have it both ways.
Here's why Nader's claim of little difference between the parties is credible and why Gore lost the election.
Gore's hand picked 2000 VP running mate a keynote speaker at the 2008 RNC.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)who, when they threw their votes away on Nader, helped Bush win the election. And Nader openly acknowledged that and didn't care.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Remember he was pushing McCain and Snowsnookie in 2008, only 8 years since he co headed the Democratic ticket.
Gore is responsible for picking Lieberman, possible the worst VP candidate in US history, and hence Gore is responsible for making Nader's claims far more credible than they would have been otherwise.
It was Gore's election to lose and he let it get close enough to steal by picking that vile creature for his running mate.
I watched the 2000 VP debates, Lieberman spent more time agreeing with Cheney than disagreeing. Lieberman is simply a smarmier and more hypocritical version of Cheney.
Feel the Joementum.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)if the progressives who voted for Nader had voted for the progressive who was actually electable.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Gore was trying to make it clear that he was no lefty, why blame progressive voters who took his actions at face value?
The country would be far better off if Gore had not tried to triangulate the right and the center against the left with all the grace of a blind drunk hippopotamus.
Like Truman said, when offered a choice between a fake Republican and a real one voters will pick the real one, Lieberman was undeniable a fake Republican and the voters decided they'd rather have the real thing than a fake Republican Droopy Dog.
As a moral choice I actually prefer Cheney to Lieberman, Cheney doesn't make any bones about being a first rate asshole, Lieberman is a first rate asshole who tries to disguise it with saccharine false piety, the very worst kind of hypocrite and a traitor to boot.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Just like how Nader preferred Bush to Gore.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I mean I have more respect for Cheney than for Lieberman, Cheney didn't show up at the 2008 DNC pimping Obama, the guy at least has some moral conviction even if I completely disagree with it.
Lieberman is a hollow shell, a Democratic VP candidate who a mere eight years later does a complete 180 and shows up on the Republican team, pimping the worst Republican slate since the Big Bang, zero moral compass whatsoever.
A wolf who is unabashedly a wolf is preferable to a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)and I think it has been the first...response by me to anything about this man, since his traitorous, arrogant actions.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Clearly, he hasn't learned anything since he helped Bush beat Gore.
olddots
(10,237 posts)can't blame him personally ,people around him probably said " Ralph you're presidential material here is some money "
he did some good in the early 60s for consumers - I wouldn't vote for him for city council in a town of 3 people -
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)to him condoning Bush, when every president gets one?
Sorry Ralph, I am in Florida, and I heard the talk radio celebrate how skillfully they played you and your tools to get enough votes. Not that you have ever returned ONE CENT of BLOOD MONEY Rush Limbaugh and his followers gave you.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Cha
(296,868 posts)he's the one whose campaigning in Florida helped enscounce him in there. Weasely little nitpicker except when it came to the big important thing. Spouting off his lies about there's no difference between bush and Gore. Too bad so many in Florida believed mr fuckhead.
nader: "look at me.. I'm so fucking pure"
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 20, 2013, 11:47 PM - Edit history (1)
Do you know where and when this picture was taken and what he was doing?
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)most Americans aren't. Many people do dislike both parties for their corporate corruption and Gore is corporate.
Cha
(296,868 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)When in office Gore refused to help ratify the Kyoto protocol. http://www.dissidentvoice.org/July06/Frank18.htm
He is a fair weather environmentalist, and did not support these things when he was in office.
Cha
(296,868 posts)Anyway it is what it is.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)who honestly opposes such things. So it is better if you think dishonesty is better. Yes he is what he is, and if people don't want to vote for that it is the fault of the candidate not the voter or the persons opponents.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Was Gore not a dlcer, like the President he served?
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)How old are you?
n/t
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Don't blame the voters if the candidate fails to get their votes.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Which happens more often in politics. Clinton got elected twice thanks to Perot in the race. That made the Rs take over the right wing third party and drown it in the bathtub while paying for Nader's run.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Not because of Nader, but because he failed to appeal to them. You might as well say that Nader lost to Bush because he failed to win the middle that Gore stole from him
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)But, if Nader had not been in the race the margin would have been enough to prevent the history of Bush stealiong the presidency.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Which Gore didn't.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)that is antidemocratic and assumes you are entitled to votes. You are not.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)The Mendez brother's have now provided the ultimate definition of Hutzpah.
They killed their parents and then beg the court for mercy because they are orphans.
zeeland
(247 posts)"The World According to Dick Cheney"
"I don't lay awake nights thinking, 'Gee, what are they going to say about me now,'" Cheney says in voiceover. "I didn't worry about it a lot when I was doing it, and I thought the best way to get on with my life and my career was to do what I thought was right. I did what I did and it's all part of the public record, and I feel very good about it. If I had to do it over again, I'd do it in a minute."
Sounds as if they have their stories straight, but I'd be surprised to see either one leave the
Country and travel to Spain or any other country that has warrants out for their arrests
For crimes against humanity. They can throw all the money they have at their ghastly
memorials and the world knows the truth. The world will always know and "the public record"
will reflect the truth if we have anything to say about it, and we will.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)not Nader.
Vote's don't belong to anyone, in a democracy. You have to earn them.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Perhaps if he stood for something besides corporatism he would have won. Face it, when people are given a choice between a Republican-lite and a real Republican they will choose the real thing 9 times out of 10 and Gore.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)FUCK RALPH NADER.
byeya
(2,842 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)although it didnt matter in my state I still regret it. Eight years of Bush has changed this country and world probably forever.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)The dems controlled both houses, and the Presidency for 2 years and haven't repaired any of the damage done. Maybe they support those policies too, so it wasn't just Bush that was responsible.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)especially when we have House controlled by Republicans intent on blocking anything President Obama wants to do.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Who will repair that damage?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)must have missed that.
SCROTUS had more to do with Bush's selection than Nader.
As a DUer once reminded me, Ralph, was participating in the democratic process legally.
byeya
(2,842 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)and awarded Bush the office. Much easier to blame a person then an entire institution supposedly in charge of justice.
jessie04
(1,528 posts)n-t
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)"The Presidential outlawry continues as a bipartisan dissolution of our constitutional system because the vast majority of we the people are not demanding our constitutionally sovereign power."
.