General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas Explosion Seen as Sign of Weak U.S. Oversight
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-19/texas-explosion-seen-as-sign-of-weak-u-s-oversight.htmlSmoke rises from the rubble of a house next to the fertilizer plant that exploded yesterday afternoon on April 18, 2013 in West, Texas.
The Texas plant that was the scene of a deadly explosion this week was last inspected by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in 1985. The risk plan it filed with regulators listed no flammable chemicals. And it was cleared to hold many times the ammonium nitrate that was used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
For worker- and chemical-safety advocates who have been pushing the U.S. government to crack down on facilities that make or store large quantities of hazardous chemicals, the blast in West, Texas, was a grim reminder of the risks these plants pose. And they say regulators havent done enough to tackle the problem.
Definitely, somewhere along the line at the federal level, there was a failure, Sean Moulton, director of open government policy at the Center for Effective Government, a Washington-based watchdog, said in an interview. It was quite clear that they just didnt consider flammability or explosiveness to be a problem, and given what occurred that was clearly shortsighted.
The April 17 fire and explosion at Adair Grain Inc.s West Fertilizer Co. plant flattened houses and devastated the center of the town of West, about 80 miles south of Dallas. Search crews had recovered 12 bodies as of noon today and 200 people were reported injured, making it the worst U.S. industrial disaster in three years. U.S. Senator John Cornyn said 60 people remain unaccounted for.
marybourg
(12,606 posts)on point
(2,506 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)This was NOT an OSHA problem. Or a worker safety problem.
This storage facility blew up because a building with ammonium nitrate inside caught on fire.
People died because the negligent bastard who owns/manages the place didn't report the ammonium nitrate or file appropriate reporting to DHS.
If the feds are going to inspect every fertilizer dealer at every wide spot in the road across this country, then we're going to need a lot more federal inspectors.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)The plant had not been inspected for close to 30 years! It IS most certainly a problem of lax regulation and lax inspection. There have NEVER been enough OSHA inspectors.
So, yes, the owners did get away with murder, but only because the government (both Texas and the feds) allowed them to.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)moondust
(19,966 posts)There are probably arguments to support both.
emulatorloo
(44,096 posts)They had a massive amt of ammonium nitrate that they were supposed to report. They did not do that
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Is there some state office that is supposed to check on the safety of plants for residents as well? I know you complain to the state with questions about dumping or air problems - like the company that stored mustard gas across the street from a grammar school in Belleville NJ. Note - it was reported by an employee and had to be moved.
Odd in a state that pushes less regulation and hardly has zoning laws - I think that was the thing most surprising about visiting friends in Texas - little to no zoning laws. Slums next to mansions.
musette_sf
(10,200 posts)Cheaper and easier to pay the piddling fines. Thanks GOP.
MountainLaurel
(10,271 posts)geomon666
(7,512 posts)"I'm not in favor of abolishing the government. I just want to shrink it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub."
Tarheel_Dem
(31,228 posts)openly ruminated about secession from the "heavy hand of the federal government". And let's not forget the idiots who approved land development around this plant to include a school, residential dwellings & a nursing home.
Before you go blaming the feds for this, ask yourself who in TX was gonna approve tax hikes to hire enough inspectors, that they openly despise, to more closely monitor places like this. In this past presidential election, West (McLennan County) voted for the party of no regulation by a whopping 30 pts. http://www.politico.com/2012-election/results/president/texas/ So, you get what you vote for, and if that happens to be the party who claims that regulations are "job killers", then you take your chances.
TwilightZone
(25,451 posts)Ron Paul.
Let the market decide, indeed.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,228 posts)I want to hear him argue that the residents, or even better, the chemical company needs to rebuild this city on their own.
TwilightZone
(25,451 posts)His explanation for why he's in the top five on earmark requests was that he's against earmarks, in principle, but it's his job to request them for his constituents. The same will likely apply here. Federal assistance shouldn't exist, but since it does, it should be used here. That's his rationale.
He doesn't understand how that might just be a little hypocritical.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,228 posts)are just the poster boys. There's a vocal libertarian influence here at DU, and one can't help but scratch one's head at the flagrant hypocrisy. I, personally, want the people of West, TX to get all the assistance they need to recover, even though I probably disagree with them on nearly every policy position.
It'll certainly be interesting when the complaints start rolling in from these rugged individualists start griping on the teevee that the radical Muslin..Kenyan..Socialist in the WH didn't monitor this factory close enough, and isn't doling out the socialist cash fast enough. You and I both know it's coming. It's ironic that these rugged individualists get back far more money than they send to the federal government.
emulatorloo
(44,096 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)That part is hard to believe. It is precisely why we created regulations early in the 20th century. The enormity of the blast area is really frightening.
TwilightZone
(25,451 posts)As the article states, it was inspected several times by environmental regulators in the past ten years.
Clearly, the circumstances that caused the fire/explosion either weren't present at the time of the inspections or, perhaps more likely, not covered by the inspection process.
senseandsensibility
(16,964 posts)The corporate media is studiously ignoring this. Let's see if MSNBC covers it even after the explosion story (which is huge, of course) dies down a bit.
sakabatou
(42,146 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... just the bomb?
No messy "safety inspectors" getting in the way of the profits.
Yeee haw!
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)oversight.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)water is wet.
WTF are people supposed to conclude other than that it is weak oversight? (not directed at you, Xchrom, but the article).
It doesn't take much brainpower to connect the dots in this situation.
rustydog
(9,186 posts)shrinking the big evil government until you can drown it in a bathtub worked...too well.