Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How do you compel someone to speak if they're not Mirandized? (Original Post) sadbear Apr 2013 OP
I just asked my husband the same question. okwmember Apr 2013 #1
Yes, he's entitled to an attorney, elleng Apr 2013 #4
Cheneyize him, aka DonViejo Apr 2013 #2
oh no you didn't!!! Trascoli Apr 2013 #10
Can't 'compel,' elleng Apr 2013 #3
Tricking him? sadbear Apr 2013 #7
It's legal to lie. demosincebirth Apr 2013 #18
This is not necessarily true. Officers can ruin a case because they lied to a suspect. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #24
Read NEW YORK v. QUARLES, 467 U.S. 649 (1984) Kennah Apr 2013 #5
God forbid anyone actually consider the law: treestar Apr 2013 #11
Thanks. Rationale here: elleng Apr 2013 #12
If Obama wants to torture him he just needs to invoke Yoo woo that CIC HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #6
This way? Honeycombe8 Apr 2013 #8
extrajudicial rendition datasuspect Apr 2013 #9
He has the right to remain silent. He hasn't been officially informed of the right. eom yawnmaster Apr 2013 #13
They get to ask him questions and can't be put off with 'I want an attorney'. randome Apr 2013 #14
Miranda does not affect the prisoner's rights -- it merely reminds the prisoner of what they are. FarCenter Apr 2013 #15
I suspect he's pretty familiar with American TV. sadbear Apr 2013 #16
Or anyone who was required to pass a civics Riftaxe Apr 2013 #30
Since he's a naturalized citizen Sgent Apr 2013 #17
And everyone else has seen it innumerable times since June 13, 1966 FarCenter Apr 2013 #19
Uh, they're trying to keep him alive, first Warpy Apr 2013 #20
Miranda says that the suspect must be read his rights Trekologer Apr 2013 #21
Thanks. sadbear Apr 2013 #23
"Sure, Mr. Tsarnaev, we can take those bullets out...... lastlib Apr 2013 #22
Waterboard. galileoreloaded Apr 2013 #25
Bieberize him PD Turk Apr 2013 #26
That's sick! sadbear Apr 2013 #27
And twisted! PD Turk Apr 2013 #28
he does have the right to remain silent wether he has been mirandized or not rollin74 Apr 2013 #29
I have a T shirt. rug Apr 2013 #31
How? Here's one method: AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #32

okwmember

(345 posts)
1. I just asked my husband the same question.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:19 PM
Apr 2013

Does not Mirandizing him mean he doesn't have the right or just that you haven't informed him of it? And if he does ask for a lawyer, do you have to give him one? Such a weird situation.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
2. Cheneyize him, aka
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:19 PM
Apr 2013

water boarding.

Hopefully this kid will know the world of hurt he's in (and created) so he willingly speaks.

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
7. Tricking him?
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:21 PM
Apr 2013

Is anything interrogators say legally binding?

I'm still at a loss.

Unless they do plan to torture him.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
24. This is not necessarily true. Officers can ruin a case because they lied to a suspect.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:33 PM
Apr 2013

It depends on the court decision.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
11. God forbid anyone actually consider the law:
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:24 PM
Apr 2013
. The doctrinal underpinnings of Miranda do not require that it be applied in all its rigor to a situation in which police officers ask questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety. In this case, so long as the gun was concealed somewhere in the supermarket, it posed more than one danger to the public safety: an accomplice might make use of it, or a customer or employee might later come upon it. Pp. 655-657.


elleng

(130,773 posts)
12. Thanks. Rationale here:
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:27 PM
Apr 2013

'Although respondent was in police custody when he made his statements and the facts come within the ambit of Miranda, nevertheless on these facts there is a "public safety" exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before a suspect's answers may be admitted [467 U.S. 649, 650] into evidence, and the availability of that exception does not depend upon the motivation of the individual officers involved. The doctrinal underpinnings of Miranda do not require that it be applied in all its rigor to a situation in which police officers ask questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety. In this case, so long as the gun was concealed somewhere in the supermarket, it posed more than one danger to the public safety: an accomplice might make use of it, or a customer or employee might later come upon it. Pp. 655-657.'

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
6. If Obama wants to torture him he just needs to invoke Yoo woo that CIC
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:21 PM
Apr 2013

has the right to do whatever he wants.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. They get to ask him questions and can't be put off with 'I want an attorney'.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:31 PM
Apr 2013

Not hard to understand.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
15. Miranda does not affect the prisoner's rights -- it merely reminds the prisoner of what they are.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:32 PM
Apr 2013

The prisoner neither gains nor loses rights by being "Mirandized". It is a rote recitation of what those rights are in case the prisoner is ignorant of them (and hasn't ever watched cop shows on TV).

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
16. I suspect he's pretty familiar with American TV.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:33 PM
Apr 2013

So I don't think he'll say a thing and this is all probably moot.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
30. Or anyone who was required to pass a civics
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:44 PM
Apr 2013

course to graduate from high school.


I know civics is a very intense part of becoming naturalized, i just do not know it was required in his circumstance

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
17. Since he's a naturalized citizen
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:36 PM
Apr 2013

he presumably learned about those rights when studying the for the exam.

Warpy

(111,175 posts)
20. Uh, they're trying to keep him alive, first
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:55 PM
Apr 2013

They said the injuries themselves weren't life threatening but he's lost a lot of blood. Also, this is about the time infection starts to appear.

I'm just glad he's alive. He's got a lot of explaining to do.

Trekologer

(996 posts)
21. Miranda says that the suspect must be read his rights
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:25 PM
Apr 2013

Without being first informed his rights (to not answer questions, to have an attorney present during questioning), any answers given by the suspect to questions would be inadmissible in court. The suspect always has those rights; they don't start or end with reading the Miranda warning. It is a matter of whether evidence obtained can be used at trial.

The exemption is that, due to public safety concerns, the authorities can question the suspect, and use those answers against him at trial, before reading the warning. He can always still not answer questions or ask for an attorney.

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
23. Thanks.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:30 PM
Apr 2013

The only reason I could think of as to why they'd delay reading Miranda rights was to coerce some sort of confession without a lawyer present. I kinda' see what they're trying to do now, but think it's more or less academic.

lastlib

(23,168 posts)
22. "Sure, Mr. Tsarnaev, we can take those bullets out......
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:27 PM
Apr 2013

....just as soon as you tell us what we need to know....can't risk losing you on the operating table before we get our information, now, can we?..."

PD Turk

(1,289 posts)
26. Bieberize him
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:40 PM
Apr 2013

Play the same Justin Bieber song over and over on in an endless loop...he'll sing like a bird before long

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
31. I have a T shirt.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:48 PM
Apr 2013

It says:

You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be selectively quoted and used against you in the court of law.

"I was there (but I didn't steal anything)."

Deception and misconstruction are much more common techniques than force. All interrogations should be recorded.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How do you compel someone...