General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow do you compel someone to speak if they're not Mirandized?
If he doesn't have the right to remain silent, what's the penalty for remaining silent?
I'm totally baffled by this.
okwmember
(345 posts)Does not Mirandizing him mean he doesn't have the right or just that you haven't informed him of it? And if he does ask for a lawyer, do you have to give him one? Such a weird situation.
elleng
(130,773 posts)and if he asks for one, he'd better be provided with one.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)water boarding.
Hopefully this kid will know the world of hurt he's in (and created) so he willingly speaks.
Trascoli
(194 posts)I agree with you, get him to talk.
elleng
(130,773 posts)might 'entice' by suggesting 'mild' treatment on sentencing.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)Is anything interrogators say legally binding?
I'm still at a loss.
Unless they do plan to torture him.
demosincebirth
(12,530 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)It depends on the court decision.
Kennah
(14,234 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)elleng
(130,773 posts)'Although respondent was in police custody when he made his statements and the facts come within the ambit of Miranda, nevertheless on these facts there is a "public safety" exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before a suspect's answers may be admitted [467 U.S. 649, 650] into evidence, and the availability of that exception does not depend upon the motivation of the individual officers involved. The doctrinal underpinnings of Miranda do not require that it be applied in all its rigor to a situation in which police officers ask questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety. In this case, so long as the gun was concealed somewhere in the supermarket, it posed more than one danger to the public safety: an accomplice might make use of it, or a customer or employee might later come upon it. Pp. 655-657.'
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)has the right to do whatever he wants.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Not hard to understand.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The prisoner neither gains nor loses rights by being "Mirandized". It is a rote recitation of what those rights are in case the prisoner is ignorant of them (and hasn't ever watched cop shows on TV).
sadbear
(4,340 posts)So I don't think he'll say a thing and this is all probably moot.
Riftaxe
(2,693 posts)course to graduate from high school.
I know civics is a very intense part of becoming naturalized, i just do not know it was required in his circumstance
Sgent
(5,857 posts)he presumably learned about those rights when studying the for the exam.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Warpy
(111,175 posts)They said the injuries themselves weren't life threatening but he's lost a lot of blood. Also, this is about the time infection starts to appear.
I'm just glad he's alive. He's got a lot of explaining to do.
Trekologer
(996 posts)Without being first informed his rights (to not answer questions, to have an attorney present during questioning), any answers given by the suspect to questions would be inadmissible in court. The suspect always has those rights; they don't start or end with reading the Miranda warning. It is a matter of whether evidence obtained can be used at trial.
The exemption is that, due to public safety concerns, the authorities can question the suspect, and use those answers against him at trial, before reading the warning. He can always still not answer questions or ask for an attorney.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)The only reason I could think of as to why they'd delay reading Miranda rights was to coerce some sort of confession without a lawyer present. I kinda' see what they're trying to do now, but think it's more or less academic.
lastlib
(23,168 posts)....just as soon as you tell us what we need to know....can't risk losing you on the operating table before we get our information, now, can we?..."
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)there is a precedent.
PD Turk
(1,289 posts)Play the same Justin Bieber song over and over on in an endless loop...he'll sing like a bird before long
sadbear
(4,340 posts)You should be ashamed of yourself.
PD Turk
(1,289 posts)I know, I should be ashamed
rollin74
(1,973 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)It says:
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be selectively quoted and used against you in the court of law.
"I was there (but I didn't steal anything)."
Deception and misconstruction are much more common techniques than force. All interrogations should be recorded.