Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bicoastal

(12,645 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:24 PM Apr 2013

Death is a poor punishment for a terrorist.

What's so bad about death? Everybody dies. Not everyone, though, has the honor of growing old in a teeny tiny room while pondering their regrettable actions for the rest of their miserable lives.

Faced with such, I'd take death. He deserves life.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Death is a poor punishment for a terrorist. (Original Post) Bicoastal Apr 2013 OP
The infliction of suffering alone should not be the primary qualifier for imprisonment. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #1
Great - let's rehab him at your place. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2013 #2
Like clockwork. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #11
Oops, too civilized for America. liberalmuse Apr 2013 #9
The kid might be fucked in the head. Who knows what his future holds. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #14
What he did was unconsciable. liberalmuse Apr 2013 #17
Vengence truly is pointless. That doesn't stop our legal system from living on it. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #18
That's so, so, so very sad for the murderer to think about. Bicoastal Apr 2013 #21
Even you must admit there should be some crimes that rehab is not an option for. Bicoastal Apr 2013 #12
No crimes should be out of consideration. I'm not, however, saying everyone can be rehabed. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #13
You have to draw the line somewhere--all the rehabbing in the world Bicoastal Apr 2013 #19
Isn't execution killing for the sake of killing? Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #20
I'm anti-Death Penalty. nt Bicoastal Apr 2013 #22
Okay, isn't life imprisonment for the sake of suffering pointless? Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #23
See my above post. They must suffer humanely because their victims' families suffer inhumanely. Bicoastal Apr 2013 #24
So what you're saying is that we should encourage healing through the suffering of others? Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #25
Healing? In some cases, the victims' families aren't GOING to heal. Not 100%. Ever. Bicoastal Apr 2013 #27
I agree death for terrorists who think they get some reward for their terrorism justiceischeap Apr 2013 #3
We don't know if this guy has a conscience or not. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2013 #4
The worst punishment is if he regains his conscience and realizes what he did. dkf Apr 2013 #5
i'd take death. DesertFlower Apr 2013 #6
where is that picture from? Matariki Apr 2013 #7
Google image search of a supermax prison cell... Bicoastal Apr 2013 #16
And therapy so he realizes who his brother was and what life means to normal people nt flamingdem Apr 2013 #8
For me, I think life w/out parole (at 19) would be a fate worse than death dballance Apr 2013 #10
Premature, no? HappyMe Apr 2013 #15
Execute and then gibbet, according to Boston's maritime tradition FarCenter Apr 2013 #26
It's a good start. edbermac Apr 2013 #28

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
1. The infliction of suffering alone should not be the primary qualifier for imprisonment.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:26 PM
Apr 2013

It is in fact the case that prison should be about prisoner rehabilitation in whatever capacity that might be possible.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
9. Oops, too civilized for America.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:30 PM
Apr 2013

Off to Canada with you! Enjoy the free socialist healthcare and greatly lowered odds of getting shot to death by a "responsible" gun owner. A real American talks about blowing perps away in a Clint Eastwood drawl, punctuated with a Barney Fife *sniff*.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
14. The kid might be fucked in the head. Who knows what his future holds.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:35 PM
Apr 2013

We don't even have a motive yet. It's a bad idea to start talking about "torture" even if it's institutionalized torture.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
17. What he did was unconsciable.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:39 PM
Apr 2013

No human should have to live knowing that they tore apart human bodies and lives with a stupid decision. Not at 19, or any age. I just want to know what happened to this kid to make him hate so much, and get photographed smirking after he laid his bomb 3 fucking feet from an 8 year old kid and his mother. I want to know what he felt when he saw the blast and the havoc and human misery he helped wreak. I can't feel happy about this in any respect, but I didn't go through the shit the people of Boston have this week. I was safe in my home 5,000 miles away. The whole thing makes my heart rip. What punishment could we do to him that we wouldn't also be doing to ourselves? Vengence is pointless and only serves to diminish the souls of those who carry it out. Justice? There's no such thing. You can't bring back a child or a limb or the bliss in knowing you can excitedly cheer on the sidelines of a race without feeling the shards of a bomb penetrate your body.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
18. Vengence truly is pointless. That doesn't stop our legal system from living on it.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:43 PM
Apr 2013

Or people from demanding that a 19 year old live in hell for the rest of his life.

It is sad. The greatest resistance to such violence is reformation. Or at least the attempt at reformation. What if 5, 10 or 20 years from now we have a changed man ready to go back out into the world and make a difference? That's true atonement.

Bicoastal

(12,645 posts)
21. That's so, so, so very sad for the murderer to think about.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:55 PM
Apr 2013

Now think about the friends and family of the victims for a second, and what they have to go through every day of THEIR natural lives. They've ALREADY been punished, and for no good reason.

So you can't pretend like a punishment doesn't exist as a result of this crime; it does, and the wrong people are serving it. Justice is making the murderer share their anger, grief, and emptiness--and since we have no way of reading a person's mind, that punishment must be accomplished through other, more humane means.

Bicoastal

(12,645 posts)
12. Even you must admit there should be some crimes that rehab is not an option for.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:33 PM
Apr 2013

He can't erase the fact that 4 lives have been needlessly lost and numerous people have been disfigured, no matter how sorry he is.

Bicoastal

(12,645 posts)
19. You have to draw the line somewhere--all the rehabbing in the world
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:49 PM
Apr 2013

...is not going to bring the victims back to life. And this was killing purely for the sake of killing.

Their families deserve the justice, the fairness, of knowing the murderer can't just approach them on the street one day 30 years later with tears in their eyes and an "I'm Sorry" Hallmark card. Some things can't be forgiven so easily.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
23. Okay, isn't life imprisonment for the sake of suffering pointless?
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:57 PM
Apr 2013

Beyond pointless, is it not really a form of institutionalized evil?

Not being able to rehabilitate someone is one thing. Not wanting to try is something else entirely.

Bicoastal

(12,645 posts)
24. See my above post. They must suffer humanely because their victims' families suffer inhumanely.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:04 PM
Apr 2013

After all, how can those parents be rehabbed? If you lose a child in a senseless murder spree, I guarantee you you'll NEVER completely get over it.

Bicoastal

(12,645 posts)
27. Healing? In some cases, the victims' families aren't GOING to heal. Not 100%. Ever.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:18 PM
Apr 2013

If I lost a child in that manner, I'd be offended if someone thought that some day I'd possibly be all better. So why should cold-blooded murderers--people who don't kill by accident or out of rage, but deliberately and with malice aforethought--even be given the opportunity to fix their broken lives? That's. Not. FAIR.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
3. I agree death for terrorists who think they get some reward for their terrorism
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:28 PM
Apr 2013

should never be on the table. It just makes them a different type of martyr.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
4. We don't know if this guy has a conscience or not.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:28 PM
Apr 2013

Normal people assume that people who commit these heinous crimes feel guilty and suffer from remorse and sorrow. The guy might not have a conscience or feel any remorse for what he's done.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
5. The worst punishment is if he regains his conscience and realizes what he did.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:29 PM
Apr 2013

And he should hear from his uncle.

Bicoastal

(12,645 posts)
16. Google image search of a supermax prison cell...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:36 PM
Apr 2013

No idea where it's from, but I think you get my drift.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
10. For me, I think life w/out parole (at 19) would be a fate worse than death
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:31 PM
Apr 2013

I think it's also a good point that if their particular ideology rewards them for dying for their god then we're just giving them what they want.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
26. Execute and then gibbet, according to Boston's maritime tradition
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:06 PM
Apr 2013
Bird Island and Nix's Mate island in Boston Harbor were used for gibbeting pirates and sailors executed for crimes in Massachusetts during the colonial era. Their bodies were left hanging as a warning to sailors coming into the harbor and approaching Boston.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Death is a poor punishmen...