Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:21 PM Apr 2013

A Miscarried Pregnancy Or Contraception Likely To Be A Criminal Offense In Kansas Now That

Kansas has a "life begins at conception" law. Women are no longer free to govern their own health care in Kansas. That law also opens up the possibility of criminal charges for women who get an abortion out of state lines. And doctors now can be charged with murder if they effect a pregnancy that goes bad.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Miscarried Pregnancy Or Contraception Likely To Be A Criminal Offense In Kansas Now That (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Apr 2013 OP
How is that Constitutional? yourout Apr 2013 #1
Apparently The "Personhood" Bill Was Passed And Signed. TheMastersNemesis Apr 2013 #2
That's right, they don't care. They also don't care that it Arkansas Granny Apr 2013 #7
Sadly, you don't seem to understand this cali Apr 2013 #12
It's not. Someone has to sue Warpy Apr 2013 #4
No. This was passed in the eventuality that cali Apr 2013 #13
This has been happening a while in this country. My wife brought this to my attention diabeticman Apr 2013 #3
I'm not crazy about Hillary Clinton, but at this juncture, we need another pro-woman POTUS in 2016. freshwest Apr 2013 #9
You and my wife share that belief about a POTUS in 2016 but she fears by then it might diabeticman Apr 2013 #11
If you see a woman you think may be pregnant in a bar, report her. After all, she could be endangeri uppityperson Apr 2013 #5
Apparently "personhood" does not apply to women... ljm2002 Apr 2013 #6
They want government small enough to fit in women's uteruses. Odin2005 Apr 2013 #8
sigh. no it's not. the purpose of that law is if Roe is reversed cali Apr 2013 #10
Women who've miscarried should all go to court and accuse God mainer Apr 2013 #14
one more time: this does not threaten abortion rights in Kansas. Other things in the legislation cali Apr 2013 #15
A message for all sane people living in Kansas: MrScorpio Apr 2013 #16
so if your car is pulled over for a road side search is birth control now grounds for them to arrest dembotoz Apr 2013 #17
No, no and no. cali Apr 2013 #19
Does this mean that mothers now have the right to defend themselves against the person attacking... cags Apr 2013 #18
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
2. Apparently The "Personhood" Bill Was Passed And Signed.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:26 PM
Apr 2013

It does not matter to the fundies that it is not constitutional. They are above the constitution because God is above human law. They are counting on 6 Catholic justices who must believe that life begins at conception if they are to remain Catholic in good standing with the Catholic church.

Welcome to the new normal when the Pope is our President.

Arkansas Granny

(31,514 posts)
7. That's right, they don't care. They also don't care that it
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:56 PM
Apr 2013

will cost the state taxpayer dollars when the lawsuits are filed. Arkansas is facing the same type of mentality now after the legislature overrode the veto on a bill that makes abortions after 12 weeks illegal.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
12. Sadly, you don't seem to understand this
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 05:22 AM
Apr 2013

situation. I've explained it to you several times. You prefer drama to comprehension.

Warpy

(111,243 posts)
4. It's not. Someone has to sue
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:32 PM
Apr 2013

and get it as far as the state supreme court.

They keep pulling this shit in the hope that it will get to the USSC and those 5 conservative goons will overturn Roe v Wade.

They know the states won't ratify a constitutional amendment. It's too unpopular. They have to lie to get elected and start this bullshit at the state level.

I hope Kansas wakes up soon. That goes for North Dakota, too.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
13. No. This was passed in the eventuality that
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 05:24 AM
Apr 2013

Roe is overturned. It's not designed to do the overturning.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
9. I'm not crazy about Hillary Clinton, but at this juncture, we need another pro-woman POTUS in 2016.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:43 PM
Apr 2013

Obama has done all he can to protect women's rights to health care and dignity; it will take someone with a proven track record to do keep that up. In the meantime, we need to turn all of these states blue. They are taking us bck to the Dark Ages. Thanks very much for the links to those devastating pieces.

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
11. You and my wife share that belief about a POTUS in 2016 but she fears by then it might
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 04:27 AM
Apr 2013

be too late. She is the one who gave me those links And she first learned about all this NOT from American sources BUT she actually read an Article from the UK Guardian.


My wife's Grandmother had 3 kids and 2 miscarriages. My Sister-in-law had one miscarriage recently and she does have kids. Don't these law makers understand how complex the human body is?

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
5. If you see a woman you think may be pregnant in a bar, report her. After all, she could be endangeri
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:33 PM
Apr 2013

endangering the preborn child egg.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
6. Apparently "personhood" does not apply to women...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 09:33 PM
Apr 2013

...particularly not to pregnant women, or women who may be pregnant, or who could become pregnant...

But you know what, it's no surprise. Just this month we read reports of State Rep. Peter Hansen of New Hampshire referring to women as "vaginas" in an email to his colleagues. THIS IS IN 2013, dammit!!!

If there was any question about the thought processes of the angry old men who want to control women, it has been answered.

Clearly, they only think of women as body parts. Vessels for their sperm to fertilize, nothing more.

Just so we're clear on what we are dealing with.

Thanks, Mr. Hansen. That was actually very helpful.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
10. sigh. no it's not. the purpose of that law is if Roe is reversed
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:52 PM
Apr 2013

and no, under the Constitution Kansas docs cannot be prosecuted for either abortion or a pregnancy "gone bad".

It's not this that threatens abortion in Kansas, it's the TARP laws. I don't even know if the Center for Reproductive Health or the ACLU will bother challenging the personhood piece.

In any case it's foolish as hell to focus on the personhood shit while ignoring the TRAP laws that really do restrict a woman's ability to get an abortion.

I don't know why you can't grasp this.

<snip>

“Instead of making the abortion illegal, they’re trying to destroy the institutions financially so it’s not even feasible to offer abortions,” Schulze said. “The bill also creates a ‘personhood’ trigger, so if Roe v. Wade is overturned, it would make all abortions in Kansas illegal.”

<snip>

http://kansan.com/news/2013/03/25/anti-abortion-bill-passes-kansas-house-moves-to-senate/

mainer

(12,022 posts)
14. Women who've miscarried should all go to court and accuse God
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 07:53 AM
Apr 2013

since 30% percent of pregnancies end up in miscarriages, and who else is there to blame?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
15. one more time: this does not threaten abortion rights in Kansas. Other things in the legislation
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 07:56 AM
Apr 2013

do.

<snip>

But abortion opponents call the fertilization language a statement of principle and not an outright ban on terminating pregnancies. The new law specifically notes that any rights suggested by the language are limited by decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court protecting access to abortion.

<snip>

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/20/kansas-governor-abortion-bill/2098801/

Allowing ourselves to be distracted by this is stupid. falling right into their TRAP.

dembotoz

(16,799 posts)
17. so if your car is pulled over for a road side search is birth control now grounds for them to arrest
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 08:44 AM
Apr 2013

you?????

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
19. No, no and no.
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 08:55 AM
Apr 2013

this part of the law does NOT effect abortion rights in Kansas- and I've explained why several times in this thread and in an op, but everyone is ignoring the facts I've put forth and allowing themselves to be distracted for the dubious pleasure of engaging in drama.

cags

(1,914 posts)
18. Does this mean that mothers now have the right to defend themselves against the person attacking...
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 08:51 AM
Apr 2013

her body?

If an adult tried to suck your blood and nutrients and cause you to vomit, and stretch your skin against your will you have the right to stop them correct?

Could they argue for self defense?


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Miscarried Pregnancy Or...