General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust curious about First Amendment rights in Warertown...
They have been searching homes ll afternoon and I wonder if the Authorities respected 1st Amendment Rights of those people who are having their homes searched.
Or are they using this criminal act as an excuse to do what ever they have to do in order to capture the bombing suspect.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)and in a case of hot pursuit like this, I doubt this would be considered "illegal search and seizure". Especially since the cops are after White Hat, not the residents.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)protection of private property.
This is a murky situation since the homes of the people are not being searched to determine if the home owner is a suspect but rather they are searching private property to see if a person of interest is on that property.
I'm not a lawyer I was just wondering if the law enforcement officers had to respect the private property that were not considered a suspect.
Trekologer
(997 posts)Unless you're referring to telling the authorities to go Cheney themselves.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Obviously this was reasonable.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)"unreasonable search and seizure"
not 100% on supporting case law but in the case of a clear and present danger to public safety with an armed and dangerous terror suspect at large one would suspect that it would not be considered "unreasonable"
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)That being said, I do not expect a lot of people to say "no".
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)Anyone says no in these circumstances could have a terrorist with a gun pointed at their head behind the door, cops are coming in and clearing the house. Period.
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)...this falls rather clearly under the category of a hot pursuit/emergency situation. Law enforcement is completely permitted to engage in these searches under these conditions.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Fourth, not First.