Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:09 PM Apr 2013

Just curious about First Amendment rights in Warertown...

They have been searching homes ll afternoon and I wonder if the Authorities respected 1st Amendment Rights of those people who are having their homes searched.

Or are they using this criminal act as an excuse to do what ever they have to do in order to capture the bombing suspect.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just curious about First Amendment rights in Warertown... (Original Post) WCGreen Apr 2013 OP
I think you mean 4th Amendment rights KamaAina Apr 2013 #1
I was of the understanding that it was the First Amendment that had the WCGreen Apr 2013 #8
I think you mean the 4th amendment Trekologer Apr 2013 #2
4th amendment. And it's protection against unreasonable search and seizure. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #3
4th amendment Spider Jerusalem Apr 2013 #4
Fourth amendment means you can say "no". Not that you have to say "no". (nt) jeff47 Apr 2013 #5
I do not believe citizens have authority to deny a search of this nature. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #7
In the immediate area, probably not. But the entire dragnet isn't the immediate area jeff47 Apr 2013 #9
They don't. gcomeau Apr 2013 #10
As others said, 4th. And... gcomeau Apr 2013 #6
Exigent circumstances jberryhill Apr 2013 #11
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. I think you mean 4th Amendment rights
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:10 PM
Apr 2013

and in a case of hot pursuit like this, I doubt this would be considered "illegal search and seizure". Especially since the cops are after White Hat, not the residents.

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
8. I was of the understanding that it was the First Amendment that had the
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:17 PM
Apr 2013

protection of private property.

This is a murky situation since the homes of the people are not being searched to determine if the home owner is a suspect but rather they are searching private property to see if a person of interest is on that property.

I'm not a lawyer I was just wondering if the law enforcement officers had to respect the private property that were not considered a suspect.

Trekologer

(997 posts)
2. I think you mean the 4th amendment
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:12 PM
Apr 2013

Unless you're referring to telling the authorities to go Cheney themselves.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
3. 4th amendment. And it's protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:13 PM
Apr 2013

Obviously this was reasonable.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
4. 4th amendment
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:13 PM
Apr 2013

"unreasonable search and seizure"

not 100% on supporting case law but in the case of a clear and present danger to public safety with an armed and dangerous terror suspect at large one would suspect that it would not be considered "unreasonable"

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
9. In the immediate area, probably not. But the entire dragnet isn't the immediate area
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:19 PM
Apr 2013

That being said, I do not expect a lot of people to say "no".

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
10. They don't.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:21 PM
Apr 2013

Anyone says no in these circumstances could have a terrorist with a gun pointed at their head behind the door, cops are coming in and clearing the house. Period.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
6. As others said, 4th. And...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 07:15 PM
Apr 2013

...this falls rather clearly under the category of a hot pursuit/emergency situation. Law enforcement is completely permitted to engage in these searches under these conditions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just curious about First ...