Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:30 PM Apr 2013

Is anyone else bothered by the military involvement in the manhunt?

I thought a lot about this today, and I'm still bothered by this.

Each community hosts within their law enforcement agencies a SWAT team that has since 9/11 seen their armaments become almost militaristic on their own. These special agencies train long and hard to deal with special emergencies such as these, to precision 'military-like' accuracy. There are enough communities in the suburb-rich area of Boston to pull together enough 'SWAT' expertise without having to rely on the military.

So I really do not see how having the military involved does anything to boost the readiness of the SWAT teams by having them participate in the manhunt.

It's a slippery slope that I get an uncomfortable feeling from; I have a feeling that I'm not alone in this feeling either.

Thoughts...?

85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is anyone else bothered by the military involvement in the manhunt? (Original Post) Earth_First Apr 2013 OP
no Skittles Apr 2013 #1
No. n/t zappaman Apr 2013 #2
No. n/t Still Sensible Apr 2013 #3
Maybe you'd prefer this? randome Apr 2013 #4
Right, because that is exactly what I am suggesting... Earth_First Apr 2013 #8
not enough SWAT to handle the manhunt. n/t actslikeacarrot Apr 2013 #40
they can guard intersections to free up actual police. Marrah_G Apr 2013 #73
We should be invading Czechoslovakia by now. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #5
No. nt Bobbie Jo Apr 2013 #6
no JI7 Apr 2013 #7
I bent my Wookie. WilliamPitt Apr 2013 #9
William, I know that you are a man of reason... Earth_First Apr 2013 #15
I just made a personal decision WilliamPitt Apr 2013 #23
No, not offended in the least Earth_First Apr 2013 #35
You choo choo choose me? WilliamPitt Apr 2013 #47
I'd like to ask a serious question about that Orrex Apr 2013 #52
Food. WilliamPitt Apr 2013 #56
Damn Orrex Apr 2013 #79
Will: I have friends and relatives in Boston Hekate Apr 2013 #54
My cat's name is Mittens. name not needed Apr 2013 #41
No n/t OhioChick Apr 2013 #10
National guard, called by the Governor nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #11
Yep! ^^^^^^^^ nt DonViejo Apr 2013 #30
I thought it was the Guard? This kind of thing is why they exist. gcomeau Apr 2013 #12
exactly ohnoyoudidnt Apr 2013 #53
No. Poll_Blind Apr 2013 #13
No ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2013 #14
Right... Earth_First Apr 2013 #18
Are you more bothered that he hasn't been caught yet? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2013 #37
I'm not going to get involved in your setup... n/t Earth_First Apr 2013 #46
No. (n/t) WorseBeforeBetter Apr 2013 #16
The National Guard was intended for this type of situation. Dawson Leery Apr 2013 #17
Not a bit. nt cry baby Apr 2013 #19
The military is not involved. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2013 #20
Okay, I'm looking for that information right now actually... Earth_First Apr 2013 #26
If the NG is involved it would have to be at the Governor's request. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2013 #31
Yes, as of last night nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #34
Yes. premium Apr 2013 #42
yes Kali Apr 2013 #21
No. Lots of area to check, lots of houses to search etc. The more boots the better. nt jmg257 Apr 2013 #22
This is a very safe area - we probably have relatively few cops, and MannyGoldstein Apr 2013 #24
Not at all. nt MOTRDemocrat Apr 2013 #25
National Guard is OK in this situation for crowd control; public order, etc Let LE handle the byeya Apr 2013 #27
No. Hekate Apr 2013 #28
Yes. earthside Apr 2013 #29
Probably. DU is not immune to idiocy. 11 Bravo Apr 2013 #32
Hey, thanks for the slam... Earth_First Apr 2013 #39
No jpak Apr 2013 #33
It's not the military, it's the NG. I'm sure the folks in Boston are glad they are there. n/t Tx4obama Apr 2013 #36
I thought they were soldiers too Generic Other Apr 2013 #38
I saw that photograph, and I'm fairly certain those were in fact State Police... Earth_First Apr 2013 #43
Militarized Police maybe, or National Guard, but not active duty US Military. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #44
I would ask the people in Massachusetts how they are feeling ... etherealtruth Apr 2013 #45
That's a valid point... Earth_First Apr 2013 #49
Its hard to know .... etherealtruth Apr 2013 #57
I have no concerns. nt bluestate10 Apr 2013 #75
Yes. Arctic Dave Apr 2013 #48
The piles of money available to police to become more militarized dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #60
In Boston the Army Nat guard was doing things like guarding intersections Marrah_G Apr 2013 #76
Were they armed? Arctic Dave Apr 2013 #81
The army guys doing the guarding were Marrah_G Apr 2013 #83
Nope. But I have a former military friend who doesn't like it. kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #50
National Guard troops. I don't suppose you'd complain if they were used SlimJimmy Apr 2013 #51
Well there could be more going on then we know. Rex Apr 2013 #55
No. I welcome their help. Same as in storms like Sandy.They are the mililtia refered in the 2nd. graham4anything Apr 2013 #58
In a situation such as a natural disaster, I welcome their help as well... Earth_First Apr 2013 #59
No, plus the military has the best EOD techs Crabby Appleton Apr 2013 #61
Better that the National Guard is available and mobilized HERE for such duty than mnhtnbb Apr 2013 #62
It's normal to have the Nat'l Guard out in emergencies Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #63
NO. nt Raine Apr 2013 #64
Were you bothered by the National Guard coming out ... Travelman Apr 2013 #65
From what I heard, Recovered Repug Apr 2013 #66
I haven't heard exactly sarisataka Apr 2013 #67
Things like blocking off streets Marrah_G Apr 2013 #71
That is reasonable sarisataka Apr 2013 #74
These guys live here :) Marrah_G Apr 2013 #78
My last duty assignment sarisataka Apr 2013 #82
I'm fortunate in that mine has never had to go over seas (knock on wood) Marrah_G Apr 2013 #84
They could call out the Minutemen FarCenter Apr 2013 #68
I wish I could post a picture Marrah_G Apr 2013 #80
No. nt frogmarch Apr 2013 #69
It was the National guard. That is why we have them.... Marrah_G Apr 2013 #70
The National Guard is under state control until federalized. Governor Patrick is controlling bluestate10 Apr 2013 #72
This was still a terrorist attack, yeah? justiceischeap Apr 2013 #77
No. n/t BeeBee Apr 2013 #85

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
8. Right, because that is exactly what I am suggesting...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:33 PM
Apr 2013

I suggest maybe re-reading my OP where it explains that SWAT is specially trained to deal with these situations.

So why involve the military?

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
15. William, I know that you are a man of reason...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:34 PM
Apr 2013

...and I also know that you are affected by this in a VERY personal way.

I'm shocked that you would respond this way.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
23. I just made a personal decision
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:37 PM
Apr 2013

to respond to all 45,332,987 "Martial Law Civil Liberties" questions with quotes by Ralph from the Simpsons from now on. It's the only way I can remain sane.

If you want more enlightened discussion, look fort all the other places I have discuss this on this board.

In the meantime, it's Ralph.

P.S. If my offering snarky replies on DU "shocks" you, I think you might need to get out more.

P.P.S. It's the National Guard, not federal troops.

P.P.P.S. My cat's breath smells like cat food.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
35. No, not offended in the least
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:40 PM
Apr 2013

...and I caught the reference

I appologize if this has been discussed ad naseum throughout the day, I myself have been away at work and through an atttempt to process the days' events, this is the first thought that I felt compelled to discuss with others...

I don't have a lot of individuals who care to discuss current events with, so DU becomes my outlet for such things.

Orrex

(63,172 posts)
52. I'd like to ask a serious question about that
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:49 PM
Apr 2013
P.P.P.S. My cat's breath smells like cat food.

I have a distinct, though not necessarily accurate, memory of Ralph originally delivering the line as "My cat's breath smells like cat litter."

Am I remembering it incorrectly? Or was it changed after the original airing?


This is important, dammit!

Hekate

(90,561 posts)
54. Will: I have friends and relatives in Boston
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:50 PM
Apr 2013
to you

My sister's grown kids emailed her to let her know they were okay right after the Marathon. As of now, I just assume they are all on lockdown with the rest of the city (or whatever is happening as of now).

My hairdresser of 25+ years, wife of my son's elementary school teacher, is there right now visiting their son, DIL, and baby. I stopped by the shop yesterday to ask after her and was informed that they were all back at the condo when the Marathon bombs went off. As of now, well, I am guessing same as my niece and nephew.

It has to be terrifying being in that region -- this whole week. Everyone's PTSD from the events of 9-11 is no doubt being triggered -- I know that everyone there (including my family members) knew someone who knew a passenger on those airplanes.

Peace and safety to you all. May this end soon.
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
11. National guard, called by the Governor
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:34 PM
Apr 2013

Like we have seen in multiple events before 911. These are not Federal troops.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
12. I thought it was the Guard? This kind of thing is why they exist.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:34 PM
Apr 2013

And there may be lots of SWAT guys but the concern here isn't that the SWAT teams couldn't handle them if they find him... it's finding him at all. And Boston is a big place. More bodies = good. So no, not concerned.

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
13. No.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:34 PM
Apr 2013

Dudeman's maybe got explosives and automatic weapons. I heard policeman on the scanner last night, scared and desperate, calling for long gun backup because these motherfuckers were throwing bombs at them and shooting machine guns.

PB

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
18. Right...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:35 PM
Apr 2013

I forgot that opinon is "concern" when it bucks mainstream thought on DemocraticUnderground.

How silly of me...

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
37. Are you more bothered that he hasn't been caught yet?
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:41 PM
Apr 2013

Are you more concerned for the safety of the people of Watertown?

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,606 posts)
20. The military is not involved.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:36 PM
Apr 2013

There is a law called the Posse Comitatus Act that expressly prohibits federal military forces from participating in domestic law enforcement. A state's National Guard can get involved but only if invited to do so by that state's governor. What we are seeing is military-style equipment that is owned and operated by state and local law enforcement. It is fair to have some concern over the militarization of domestic police in general, but the only military personnel that could be legally involved in this operation would be the Massachusetts National Guard at the request of the governor.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
26. Okay, I'm looking for that information right now actually...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:37 PM
Apr 2013

Was the NG mobilized at behest of the Governor, in my attempt to keep up with the events while away at work; I was unable to ascertain that information.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,606 posts)
31. If the NG is involved it would have to be at the Governor's request.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:39 PM
Apr 2013

Otherwise they wouldn't, and couldn't, participate.

Kali

(55,004 posts)
21. yes
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:36 PM
Apr 2013

but I live near the US-Mexican border, we have been pretty militarized around here for years. I am rather sick of it.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
24. This is a very safe area - we probably have relatively few cops, and
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:37 PM
Apr 2013

there's a large area that needs to be searched with painstaking care.

So I'm not sure there's much alternative.

 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
27. National Guard is OK in this situation for crowd control; public order, etc Let LE handle the
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:37 PM
Apr 2013

investigation and apprehension.
This seems to be what's happening.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
29. Yes.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:38 PM
Apr 2013

I am starting to believe that the various involved governments are on the verge of overplaying this situation.

At some point fear and terrorism become self-fulfilling.

Use the military more and more domestically, especially in situations not involving natural disaster, and it becomes too easy to expect military presence in everyday circumstances.

Of course, the news media is definitely overplaying this.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
38. I thought they were soldiers too
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:41 PM
Apr 2013

but the back of their camo said State Patrol. But they looked like infantry.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
43. I saw that photograph, and I'm fairly certain those were in fact State Police...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:43 PM
Apr 2013

The SWAT uniforms for many LEO organizations mimic the 'BDU'-style military uniform, so this in not what I was questioning.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
44. Militarized Police maybe, or National Guard, but not active duty US Military.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:44 PM
Apr 2013

I'd heard earlier that the Blackhawk helicopters belonged to the National Guard.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
45. I would ask the people in Massachusetts how they are feeling ...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:44 PM
Apr 2013

... the folk in the interviews appear pretty comforted that the NG is on the job ....?

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
49. That's a valid point...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:47 PM
Apr 2013

I'm sure that many if not most are extremely appriciative.

It definately brings to light the situation where it's easier to discuss the situation from a distance; I may even be crossing a insensitivity line that when I wrote the OP did not even consider...

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
57. Its hard to know ....
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:54 PM
Apr 2013

.... when we are hundreds or thousands of miles away from something like this.

I truly don't know if people are comforted or angry .... but, I am going to let them decide .... if they start "bitching" about it I am going to listen. I will also listen if they are comforted by the response.

Heck, I don't know .... we are sailing in uncharted waters.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
48. Yes.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:46 PM
Apr 2013

I think we are catching the glimpse of the full integration of law and military in action.



Will people be as happy about this of they kill innocent people, that is the next question. If they do will the families have a recourse against them or will they be chalked up as "collateral damage"?


Oh, and as for the people saying, it's the NG, not the "real" military, what the fuck do you think they were doing in Iraq and Afghanistan?

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
60. The piles of money available to police to become more militarized
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 05:03 PM
Apr 2013

makes me concerned.
OTOH, won't be much call for the military seeing as how the police have same weapons and outfits.

Obviously such heavy duty gear is necessary in this case
but as I watched the same parade of armored vehicles and shock troop outfits driving thru New Orleans after Katrina, I got a far different vibe.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
76. In Boston the Army Nat guard was doing things like guarding intersections
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:28 PM
Apr 2013

The AF guard was making sure all the different agencies could communicate with each other smoothly and helping with logistics.

They were not and are not kicking down doors.

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
81. Were they armed?
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:33 PM
Apr 2013

From pictures I've seen, I would say yes.

That, to me, is always a call for pause.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
83. The army guys doing the guarding were
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:36 PM
Apr 2013

Others, like my son carry a laptop and a cell phone

They are armed just in case.

I can understand why that can be un-nerving to some people, but I am betting you won't find any instances of them pointing those guns at folks.

I don't know what the guard is like in other places, but here they aren't a bunch of gun toting assholes.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
50. Nope. But I have a former military friend who doesn't like it.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:48 PM
Apr 2013

He also has a bunch of guns and thinks Republicans and Democrats (politicians) are all equally bad.

To his credit, he is socially very liberal. NOT a teabagger at all.

SlimJimmy

(3,180 posts)
51. National Guard troops. I don't suppose you'd complain if they were used
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:48 PM
Apr 2013

to help flood or other disaster victims?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
55. Well there could be more going on then we know.
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 04:52 PM
Apr 2013

I would suspect the military has a lot more real world/real time experience with these kinds of situations then the Boston PD. Call it a hunch.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
59. In a situation such as a natural disaster, I welcome their help as well...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 05:02 PM
Apr 2013

The OP and resulting responses is helping me come around to the idea of being of some assistance in this "unprecedented" situation...

mnhtnbb

(31,374 posts)
62. Better that the National Guard is available and mobilized HERE for such duty than
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 05:06 PM
Apr 2013

being sent overseas to fight some illegal and immoral war.

So, no, I am not disturbed by the presence of the National Guard in the search
for the wanted suspect.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
63. It's normal to have the Nat'l Guard out in emergencies
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 05:14 PM
Apr 2013

Police & fire are overwhelmed. Anyone who's been in major hurricane areas, for example, has seen the Nat'l Guard posts in the aftermath.
They do everything from clearing highways and manning relief stations to enforcing curfews.

Some states also have their own state units (I'm sure this is true for NY, VA & CA) who can't be nationalized and sent overseas, but otherwise operate just like the National Guard in these emergencies. For example, the NY State Guard was called up in the wake of Sandy and was providing emergency assistance for at least six weeks.

In a situation like this you want these people involved. Then there will also be units like the BATF and Homeland Security that I'm sure get mobilized and sent in.

Regular army units can only be mobilized under very special circs due to Posse Comitatus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

When you have something this big, even pulling in emergency assistance from the police units in surrounding areas can't cover all the ground.

Travelman

(708 posts)
65. Were you bothered by the National Guard coming out ...
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:10 PM
Apr 2013

... to help all of those people after Sandy struck? I certainly wasn't.

Recovered Repug

(1,518 posts)
66. From what I heard,
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:15 PM
Apr 2013

the NG was used to provide logistics, transportation and crowd control. They weren't involved in the door-to-door search.

sarisataka

(18,497 posts)
67. I haven't heard exactly
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:15 PM
Apr 2013

what the military are doing

From what I have seen, it looks like traffic control and standing around. I suspect there may be some EOD specialists who would consult with their civilian counterparts when a suspicious package is found.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
71. Things like blocking off streets
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:22 PM
Apr 2013

and the Air guard here has an excellent mobile communications unit that trains for exactly something like this.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
78. These guys live here :)
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:31 PM
Apr 2013

They are our siblings, our parents, our children ( my own in particular ) .

They do this for alot of reasons, one of which is love of their communities.

sarisataka

(18,497 posts)
82. My last duty assignment
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:36 PM
Apr 2013

was training NG troops before they headed overseas. A very likable bunch of guys and gals from NY, MN and WI. I really enjoyed working with them. I was pleased to hear they suffered minimal injuries and sadly 1 KIA.

Best wishes to your children for a safe service and Thanks

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
84. I'm fortunate in that mine has never had to go over seas (knock on wood)
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:40 PM
Apr 2013

He's just 20 and has just reached the point in his career where he is eligible to go over ( AF combat comm).

Thank you for training them

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
68. They could call out the Minutemen
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:19 PM
Apr 2013
By the rude bridge that arched the flood,
Their flag to April’s breeze unfurled,
Here once the embattled farmers stood,
And fired the shot heard round the world.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
72. The National Guard is under state control until federalized. Governor Patrick is controlling
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:22 PM
Apr 2013

the Massachusetts National Guard troops that are providing perimeter control on the area being searched. I have no concerns at all.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
77. This was still a terrorist attack, yeah?
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 06:30 PM
Apr 2013

When else would you call in the National Guard if not then? Were you bothered by the National Guard being deployed after 9/11? Just because "only" 3 people were killed in Boston doesn't make this situation any less dangerous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is anyone else bothered b...