Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 08:46 PM Apr 2013

Gawker: Is the New York Post Edited by a Bigoted Drunk Who Fucks Pigs?



This morning, the New York Post published on its front page a photo of two spectators near the Boston Marathon finish line, one wearing a backpack and one with a duffel bag slung at his side, under the headline "BAG MEN." "Feds seek these two pictured at Boston Marathon," the giant subhead added.

The two had nothing to do with the bombing. One of them, whose face is clearly shown on the front page, is a 17-year-old high-school runner. They were among the many bag-toting people whose images were being studied by the internet hive-mind yesterday, and there was no good reason to think they were the bombers. Yet there they were, on every newsstand in New York: "Feds seek these two."

As it has been all week, the New York Post was wrong. And as it has all week, the Post denied being wrong. This afternoon—after the Post had run a story conceding that the two were not suspects—Col Allan, the paper's editor, issued a statement defending the front page: We stand by our story. The image was emailed to law enforcement agencies yesterday afternoon seeking information about these men, as our story reported. We did not identify them as suspects.

snip...

We would not say that, any more than we would say that Col Allan fucks pigs. He is from Australia; if he were to engage in bestiality, it's much more likely that it would be with sheep. But we are not saying Col Allan fucks sheep, either. It could be that Col Allan fucks pigs or sheep. We do not know. It would be irresponsible to speculate.

http://gawker.com/5994999/is-the-new-york-post-edited-by-a-bigoted-drunk-who-fucks-pigs
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gawker: Is the New York Post Edited by a Bigoted Drunk Who Fucks Pigs? (Original Post) onehandle Apr 2013 OP
oops... mike_c Apr 2013 #1
What do you have against pigs? BainsBane Apr 2013 #2
pigs protest MFM008 Apr 2013 #12
In this guy's case? Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #14
Has he denied engaging in sexual congress with the same goat who gave Andrew Breitbart syphilis? Brother Buzz Apr 2013 #3
That goat is in jail DJ13 Apr 2013 #6
Dunno, but it's possible that the owner of NY Post is. nt Zorra Apr 2013 #4
Well I hope those kids sue the pants off that nasty malaise Apr 2013 #5
+1. First of many racist attacks already have occured. Good work, NYPost. freshwest Apr 2013 #11
You know you fucked up when Gawker calls out your lack of journalistic integrity. name not needed Apr 2013 #7
LOL!!! Rex Apr 2013 #8
Yep. nt onehandle Apr 2013 #10
I have to admit to being a big Gawker fan... dorkzilla Apr 2013 #9
Zoinks! Blue Owl Apr 2013 #13

Brother Buzz

(36,378 posts)
3. Has he denied engaging in sexual congress with the same goat who gave Andrew Breitbart syphilis?
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 08:55 PM
Apr 2013

I haven't heard him deny it yet.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
9. I have to admit to being a big Gawker fan...
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 09:17 PM
Apr 2013

Yes, I hang my head in shame (not really) but they have some really funny writers. Caity Weaver leaves me in absolute stitches; her Thatz Not Okay column is hysterical.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gawker: Is the New York P...