Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tab

(11,093 posts)
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 04:54 PM Apr 2013

It's stuff like this that bugs me about the explosion in Texas

Zak Covar, the executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, said during the governor’s news conference that the company has been in business since 1962 and is one of a number of small fertilizer companies across rural Texas. The company has “an average compliance history,” with one air quality complaint registered in 2006. In that episode, on June 9, 2006, according to state records, residents complained to the commission about the “ammonia smell” that was “very bad last night.”

That occurrence was investigated by the agency and resolved with the granting of two air permits to the company by the end of that year, Mr. Covar said.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/us/huge-blast-at-texas-fertilizer-plant.html?pagewanted=2

So, maybe it was nothing, but if I lived next to an ammonia facility, with ammonia being highly explosive, and had a strong smell of ammonia in the air, I'd be very concerned. I would hope that investigation would fix the problem originating the smell, not just granting them permits to have that leak.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's stuff like this that bugs me about the explosion in Texas (Original Post) Tab Apr 2013 OP
Anhydrous ammonia can be used in meth labs Warpy Apr 2013 #1
odd conspiracy. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #2
It works better than the Pox News "them Ay rabs is everywhere" Warpy Apr 2013 #5
They have added a pink dye Mnpaul Apr 2013 #20
As a Texan I have to explain to you that TCEQ is worthless sonias Apr 2013 #3
My understanding is that the mission of the TCEQ Ilsa Apr 2013 #8
Yes but neither of those bother the TCEQ Commissioners sonias Apr 2013 #10
+1000 susanr516 Apr 2013 #14
The Canadian equivalent of this plant... CanSocDem Apr 2013 #4
Yeah, but it isn't a manufacturing facility. It merely distributed. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #6
25 tons of fertilizer- elehhhhna Apr 2013 #15
That's likely the key. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #17
Gov. Perry likes his regulations fast and loose Blue Owl Apr 2013 #7
I guess the thing that bothers me.. sendero Apr 2013 #9
Totally understand and agree sonias Apr 2013 #11
I think they may have been more concerned of life safety than property safety. Sheepshank Apr 2013 #12
The video we saw. sendero Apr 2013 #13
Like the Texas City explosion in 1947. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2013 #21
Let's hope those company owners Zoeisright Apr 2013 #16
Hey we don't want to burden business KinMd Apr 2013 #18
The "Kenyan Marxist", eh? Tab Apr 2013 #19

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
1. Anhydrous ammonia can be used in meth labs
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:01 PM
Apr 2013

and since the fire started after the plant had closed for the day, the nasty, suspicious part of my brain wants to now if there was a bleed off scheme to generate a little black market profit by tapping off some of the ammonia for local cookers.

Those people are likely dead, most likely, so there's no way to know.

Chances are bigger that it was just a terrible accident.

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
5. It works better than the Pox News "them Ay rabs is everywhere"
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:33 PM
Apr 2013

Fertilizer companies tightened security a hell of a lot after the OKC bombing.

I honestly think this was just a terrible accident. However, the scenario I pointed out is the only likely criminal one I could come up with, and it's a long shot. That stuff is just too hard to deal with.

sonias

(18,063 posts)
3. As a Texan I have to explain to you that TCEQ is worthless
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:28 PM
Apr 2013

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality(TCEQ) is a sham. In fact we pronounce TCEQ as "toxic". TCEQ is a captured agency that works for big business - not for the protection of the citizens of Texas. They hardly ever fine any company, let alone really monitor the environmental quality of any business. Rick Perry appoints all the commissioners to this agency and the pretty much rubber stamp every business deal. Or side with the business against citizen complaints. Citizen complaints may get a cursory write up but I doubt that anything tangible came from the inspection back in 2006. No one in Texas should be naive enough to think that we have an environmental protection agency. We reply on the federal government (EPA) to do the real work. Sad but true.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
8. My understanding is that the mission of the TCEQ
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:45 PM
Apr 2013

to replace doing inspections normally done by the EPA, which won't let business get away with this crap.

This sounds criminal. It's certainly unethical and immoral.

sonias

(18,063 posts)
10. Yes but neither of those bother the TCEQ Commissioners
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:54 PM
Apr 2013

I mean the unethical or immoral part. Really all of them are corporate criminals.

And Texas Legislators are trying to make TCEQ even weaker and less receptive to citizen complaints (also known as contested cases).

Case in point:

State Impact 3/20/13
Coming Soon to the TCEQ: Greenhouse Gas Permits?

(snip)
Contested Cases

David Power, Deputy Director of Public Citizen, a watchdog group, said contested case hearings, which can be part of the EPA permitting process, should be included in the TCEQ’s process.

Contested case hearings allow citizens, such as a resident living near a soon-to-be-built fractionator ( or anything else that requires an environmental permit), to come forward, protest the permit and insert themselves into the bureaucratic process. Power told StateImpact that the bill would put an end to such hearings.

“If we ended up doing this with contested case hearings, we wouldn’t be achieving anything.”
-State Rep. Wayne Smith.

If they’d keep contested case hearings, “we think that it would be a good bill.” Power said.

Rep. Smith said those hearings are exactly the type of process he’s trying to get rid of. Contested case hearings can string the permit process out a year or more.


Republicans can't stand any thing getting in the way of big business. Not even safety concerns.

susanr516

(1,425 posts)
14. +1000
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 07:37 PM
Apr 2013

TCEQ exists to provide cover for the dirtiest, most toxic industries. Before it was "toxic" TCEQ, it was called "trainwreck" TNRCC.

 

CanSocDem

(3,286 posts)
4. The Canadian equivalent of this plant...
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:32 PM
Apr 2013


...is isolated in a type of 'rural industrial zone'. Complete access to all that mother nature has to offer, thanks to a legacy of free-market governments that long ago sold the public interest to the 'energy' industry. No towns within '30 miles' at least...

No pesky townsfolk complaining about foul petro-chemical smells.

.
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
6. Yeah, but it isn't a manufacturing facility. It merely distributed.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:36 PM
Apr 2013

What the heck were they storing that could have blown that hard?

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
15. 25 tons of fertilizer-
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 07:42 PM
Apr 2013

this time of year I suspect there's alot of fert being packaged and sold

sendero

(28,552 posts)
9. I guess the thing that bothers me..
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:50 PM
Apr 2013

... is WHY WERE THE FIREFIGHTERS THERE? Would you try to put out a fire in a gunpowder factory? Because it was practically GUARANTEED that this thing was going to blow and blow big.

They should have evacuated everyone alive and LET IT BURN.

sonias

(18,063 posts)
11. Totally understand and agree
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 05:58 PM
Apr 2013

If this company actually had a hazard management plan in place like the EPA fined them for not having. It probably would detail that no one should try to enter the building and it should be allowed to burn. Not salvageable. I doubt these poor firefighters even had a clue. Most were probably volunteer fire fighters.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
12. I think they may have been more concerned of life safety than property safety.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 06:06 PM
Apr 2013

with people having been killed and with other still MIA....walking away was likely not an option.

Had the plant been empty of personnel, I would agree with you 100% let it burn and let the insurance company work it out.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
13. The video we saw.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 06:14 PM
Apr 2013

... clearly shows a stream of water being dumped on the building.

I think this was more a case of people not understanding what they were dealing with.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
21. Like the Texas City explosion in 1947.
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 10:16 PM
Apr 2013

If they were dealing with ammonium nitrate (Texas City disaster) or anhydrous ammonia (West, TX case) they should know better than to spray water on it b/c it's explosive.

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
16. Let's hope those company owners
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 07:47 PM
Apr 2013

get their asses sued off and have to live in cardboard boxes. Along with the "regulators" and "planning commissioners". If there are any in Texas. What a hellhole.

KinMd

(966 posts)
18. Hey we don't want to burden business
Thu Apr 18, 2013, 08:26 PM
Apr 2013

with unnecessary regulation, plus if it all blows up, we'll ask the Kenyan Marxist for help

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's stuff like this that...