Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 12:39 PM Apr 2013

Thank You Mr. President – In Big Win for Privacy, Administration Issues CISPA Veto Threat!

Thank You Mr. President – In Big Win for Privacy, Administration Issues CISPA Veto Threat!

By Robyn Greene

Over the last few months, more than 50,000 ACLU supporters signed our petition to the president urging him to veto CISPA if it made it to his desk. Not only did the president hear your calls – yesterday, he answered them with a resounding win for your privacy and civil liberties and threatened to veto CISPA, the dangerous privacy-busting cybersecurity bill.

The president's veto threat echoed many of our concerns, and those that he raised last year when he threatened to veto CISPA 1.0. We have long warned that CISPA threatens Americans' privacy and civil liberties by allowing for companies to share our private information, like our internet records and the content of our emails, with the government. Yesterday's veto threat makes it clear that in spite of recent amendments, CISPA still fails to adequately protect our privacy. As the veto threat states:

…the bill does not require private entities to take reasonable steps to remove irrelevant personal information when sending cybersecurity data to the government or other private sector entities. Citizens have a right to know that corporations will be held accountable…for failing to safeguard personal information adequately.

President Obama also addressed our concerns that CISPA would allow for the militarization of the internet by allowing domestic cyber threat information to be shared with the NSA or other agencies in the Department of Defense. The veto threat was unequivocal that the internet is a civilian space, stating that:

The Administration supports the longstanding tradition to treat the Internet and cyberspace as civilian spheres…[and] newly authorized information sharing for cybersecurity purposes from the private sector to the government should enter the government through a civilian agency.

While we are thrilled that the president has threatened to veto CISPA if it reaches his desk, the fight isn't over yet. The House is expected to vote on CISPA as early as today. We wrote the House and joined a coalition of 34 groups urging a "No" vote on CISPA, but every member of Congress should also hear from their constituents that they should vote for privacy, and vote "NO" on H.R. 624.

http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-national-security/thank-you-mr-president-big-win-privacy-administration


22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank You Mr. President – In Big Win for Privacy, Administration Issues CISPA Veto Threat! (Original Post) ProSense Apr 2013 OP
K&R one_voice Apr 2013 #1
Eighteen views, but I'm the first to rec or comment. Hm. BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #2
you'll be waiting a long time I fear Champion Jack Apr 2013 #3
Considering that this president is the most progressive president of our time, BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #4
Carter, Clinton, and Roosevelt are all EX-Presidents and thus safe to praise Hekate Apr 2013 #7
Yep. Revisionism is strong here. eom BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #19
Oh Christ you're sounding that one-note again. Armstead Apr 2013 #16
No. BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #18
Good. I hope he stands firm on this n/t n2doc Apr 2013 #5
Me too... truebrit71 Apr 2013 #9
Kick! n/t ProSense Apr 2013 #6
KnR. I signed the petition from Electronic Frontier Foundation Hekate Apr 2013 #8
LOL, if you think he listens, ask him where we stand on SS. WCLinolVir Apr 2013 #10
A threat is as good as a promise. OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #11
A threat is also ProSense Apr 2013 #12
"Still, I understand the need to be negative." OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #13
"Propaganda"? Facts are propaganda to you? Cha Apr 2013 #22
His promises mean nothing. nt Demo_Chris Apr 2013 #14
He promised he would ProSense Apr 2013 #15
Your posts mean nothing. Cha Apr 2013 #20
Oh snap! You sure got me good there! Demo_Chris Apr 2013 #21
Good. Now let's hope he sticks with that....And Congress still needs to be worked on Armstead Apr 2013 #17

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
2. Eighteen views, but I'm the first to rec or comment. Hm.
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 12:49 PM
Apr 2013

Shouldn't all those Democrats on DU, who believe they have a sound right to criticize and attack the president for common sense things that he does, now at least have the integrity to give credit where it's due?

I recall how they frothed at the mouth when they believed he would not only uphold a Congress passed CISPA, but that he would sign it into law and send men in black helicopters to check out our hard drives. So now they'd been proven wrong, will they give him credit? Should I hold my breath and wait and see?

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
4. Considering that this president is the most progressive president of our time,
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 01:01 PM
Apr 2013

these so-called rose-colored glasses wearing FDR "Dems" should be praising him for all the hard work he's done. Instead, they revise history {specifically the history of Social Security} to suit their rose-colored view and continue to criticize this president for everything - even things he has no control over - using a microscope.

If they would give this president a TENTH of the benefit of the doubt that they so freely give President Carter, or President Clinton, or President Roosevelt, you'd see a huge drop in anti-Obama threads on this Democratic Party-supporting site. I guess I understand my black friends when they tell me that a black person has to work three times as hard as a white man in order to get any credit. It shows so clearly on this site alone.

Hekate

(90,508 posts)
7. Carter, Clinton, and Roosevelt are all EX-Presidents and thus safe to praise
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 02:38 PM
Apr 2013

If any of them were in office today, the usual suspects at DU would be frothing at the mouth condemning every action and every word.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
16. Oh Christ you're sounding that one-note again.
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 11:29 PM
Apr 2013

Yes everytime someone criticizes Presiodent Obama it's only because he's a black president.

Satisfied?

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
11. A threat is as good as a promise.
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 02:43 PM
Apr 2013

Obama's wiretapping flip-flop? Yes
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jul/14/obamas-wiretapping-flip-flop-yes/

In October 2007, Obama spokesman Bill Burton issued this unequivocal statement to the liberal blog TPM Election Central: "To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies."

~snip~

Obama supported an amendment that would have stripped telecom immunity from the measure. But after that amendment failed, Obama declined to filibuster the bill. In fact, he voted for it. It passed the Senate, 69-28, on July 9. The House passed the same bill last month, and Bush said he would sign it soon. (McCain missed the vote because he was campaigning in Ohio, but he has consistently supported the immunity plan.)

In a message to supporters, Obama defended his position, citing a phrase Democrats fought to include that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is the "exclusive" means of wiretapping for intelligence. The bill "is far better than the Protect America Act that I voted against last year... (because it) makes it clear to any president or telecommunications company that no law supersedes the authority of the FISA court."

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
13. "Still, I understand the need to be negative."
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 10:54 PM
Apr 2013

Somebody's got to counter your pro-administration propaganda.

People might get the wrong impression.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thank You Mr. President –...