Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTruthout/Democrats Hide When Asked About Ending High-Income Loophole to Assure Social Security's Fut
Fucking cowards.
[font size=4]Democrats Hide When Asked About Ending High-Income Loophole to Assure Social Security's Future [/font]
< . . . >
Public support for elimination of the payroll tax cap is high. According to a National Academy of Social Insurance Survey conducted in 2012, 68 percent of Americans favor eliminating the cap.
< . . . >
Nevertheless, these routes to ensuring the promises made to workers that they could rely Social Security benefits are kept is little discussed on Capitol Hill. And even though the national Democratic Party has presented itself as the defender of Social Security, Remapping Debate discovered a profound unwillingness among most Democratic senators to identify their position on the issue.
< . . . >
For the majority of Senators, when we left a message for the appropriate press person, that representative never replied. For example, we reached out to Senator Patty Murrays (D-Wash.) office six times, but no one got back to us. We left the press secretary for Senator Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) five voicemails with no response. We then tried Donnellys communications director through voicemail and email and did not receive a reply. We tried Senator Maria Cantwells (D-Wash.) press office a total of eight times, and left voicemails for her communications director and deputy communications director, but neither returned our calls or emails.
Remapping Debate also never heard back from the press offices of Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), William Cowan (D-Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Christopher Murphy (D-Conn), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), and Tom Udall (D-N.M.).
< . . . >
< . . . >
Public support for elimination of the payroll tax cap is high. According to a National Academy of Social Insurance Survey conducted in 2012, 68 percent of Americans favor eliminating the cap.
< . . . >
Nevertheless, these routes to ensuring the promises made to workers that they could rely Social Security benefits are kept is little discussed on Capitol Hill. And even though the national Democratic Party has presented itself as the defender of Social Security, Remapping Debate discovered a profound unwillingness among most Democratic senators to identify their position on the issue.
< . . . >
For the majority of Senators, when we left a message for the appropriate press person, that representative never replied. For example, we reached out to Senator Patty Murrays (D-Wash.) office six times, but no one got back to us. We left the press secretary for Senator Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) five voicemails with no response. We then tried Donnellys communications director through voicemail and email and did not receive a reply. We tried Senator Maria Cantwells (D-Wash.) press office a total of eight times, and left voicemails for her communications director and deputy communications director, but neither returned our calls or emails.
Remapping Debate also never heard back from the press offices of Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), William Cowan (D-Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Christopher Murphy (D-Conn), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), and Tom Udall (D-N.M.).
< . . . >
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1496 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Truthout/Democrats Hide When Asked About Ending High-Income Loophole to Assure Social Security's Fut (Original Post)
markpkessinger
Apr 2013
OP
if you want to destroy social security, removing the cap is a great way to do it.
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#4
4dsc
(5,787 posts)1. I'll say it again, weak leadership
I need not say anything more.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)2. Blue Dogs Rule The Day
eom
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)3. The money's just not there
I posted on it yesterday.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2672981
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)4. if you want to destroy social security, removing the cap is a great way to do it.
not to mention giving the government even *more* cash to borrow to finance their wars.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)5. What do you expect from DINOs?
Stabenow annoys me no end. She's barely tolerable when she's on the progressive side of an issue. Unfortunately, Michigan's political seedbeds are remarkably infertile. Unless you drink a lot of tea laced with Koolaide...
bemildred
(90,061 posts)6. They don't want to fix it, they want to gut it.
But they are not honest enough to admit it, so we get all this dissembling and bullshit.