Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
Mon Apr 15, 2013, 04:35 AM Apr 2013

Truthout/Democrats Hide When Asked About Ending High-Income Loophole to Assure Social Security's Fut

Fucking cowards.

[font size=4]Democrats Hide When Asked About Ending High-Income Loophole to Assure Social Security's Future [/font]

< . . . >

Public support for elimination of the payroll tax cap is high. According to a National Academy of Social Insurance Survey conducted in 2012, 68 percent of Americans favor eliminating the cap.

< . . . >

Nevertheless, these routes to ensuring the promises made to workers that they could rely Social Security benefits are kept is little discussed on Capitol Hill. And even though the national Democratic Party has presented itself as the defender of Social Security, Remapping Debate discovered a profound unwillingness among most Democratic senators to identify their position on the issue.

< . . . >

For the majority of Senators, when we left a message for the appropriate press person, that representative never replied. For example, we reached out to Senator Patty Murray’s (D-Wash.) office six times, but no one got back to us. We left the press secretary for Senator Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) five voicemails with no response. We then tried Donnelly’s communications director through voicemail and email and did not receive a reply. We tried Senator Maria Cantwell’s (D-Wash.) press office a total of eight times, and left voicemails for her communications director and deputy communications director, but neither returned our calls or emails.

Remapping Debate also never heard back from the press offices of Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), William Cowan (D-Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Christopher Murphy (D-Conn), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), and Tom Udall (D-N.M.).

< . . . >
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Truthout/Democrats Hide When Asked About Ending High-Income Loophole to Assure Social Security's Fut (Original Post) markpkessinger Apr 2013 OP
I'll say it again, weak leadership 4dsc Apr 2013 #1
Blue Dogs Rule The Day cantbeserious Apr 2013 #2
The money's just not there customerserviceguy Apr 2013 #3
if you want to destroy social security, removing the cap is a great way to do it. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #4
What do you expect from DINOs? Demeter Apr 2013 #5
They don't want to fix it, they want to gut it. bemildred Apr 2013 #6
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
4. if you want to destroy social security, removing the cap is a great way to do it.
Mon Apr 15, 2013, 07:22 AM
Apr 2013

not to mention giving the government even *more* cash to borrow to finance their wars.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
5. What do you expect from DINOs?
Mon Apr 15, 2013, 07:26 AM
Apr 2013

Stabenow annoys me no end. She's barely tolerable when she's on the progressive side of an issue. Unfortunately, Michigan's political seedbeds are remarkably infertile. Unless you drink a lot of tea laced with Koolaide...

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
6. They don't want to fix it, they want to gut it.
Mon Apr 15, 2013, 07:33 AM
Apr 2013

But they are not honest enough to admit it, so we get all this dissembling and bullshit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Truthout/Democrats Hide W...