Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 09:20 AM Apr 2013

What Thatcher Didn't Understand: Inequality Hurts the Rich and Poor Alike

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/04/what-thatcher-didnt-understand-inequality-hurts-the-rich-and-poor-alike/274940/


In the aftermath of Margaret Thatcher's death this week, the television-watching public was treated to an incessant loop of her quip that the political left "would rather the poor were poorer, provided the rich were less rich." This rebuke was not, in fact, originally Thatcher's: conservative economist Milton Friedman fired off different versions of the attack throughout his influential career. But it did tidily sum up the argument Thatcher sold to the British public on her way to Downing Street.

The obvious problem with the statement is that it simply assumes left-wing policies can't improve the incomes of the poor. The cross-country data that we have generally suggest that they can and do.

But there is an even deeper flaw with Thatcher's barb. It presumes that nobody could ever seriously support making the poor poorer in order to make the rich less rich. Admittedly, the idea seems ridiculous on first glance. But there's substantial evidence that suggests inequality, in and of itself, generates a whole slew of social problems that are harmful to individual and collective wellbeing. It is therefore conceivable that policies that reduce inequality could be worth pursuing even if they leave everyone, the poor included, with less income than they would otherwise have.

In The Spirit Level, Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett draw upon decades of research to show that, among rich countries, high levels of inequality correlate with lower levels of social cohesion and social mobility, worse mental and physical health, and higher levels of crime, violence, drug use, and imprisonment. These problems do not merely afflict the poor. Rather, they touch people across the social spectrum. The implication is that large income gaps, by themselves, are significant contributors to these particular sources of human misery.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Thatcher Didn't Understand: Inequality Hurts the Rich and Poor Alike (Original Post) xchrom Apr 2013 OP
Spot on. Laelth Apr 2013 #1

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
1. Spot on.
Sun Apr 14, 2013, 12:49 PM
Apr 2013

The rich do much better when poor people have plenty of money to spend. Regressive taxation and public policy that is punitive toward the poor drive us all toward poverty. Supply-side, trickle-down economic nonsense is a proven disaster. Liberal government policy, on the other hand, would make us all richer.

Now, getting our oligarchs to understand this is another matter, altogether. Creating that understanding, I think, should be the principal aim of those of us on the left.

-Laelth

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Thatcher Didn't Unde...