General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWow, are you watching Chris Hayes?
He's talking about the attacks Melissa Harris Perry is receiving from Faux News. Melissa suggested that children were a community responsibility not just their parents. Oh, my Gawd, the communist, Maoist woman dared suggest this?
HAIR ON FIRE!
What horrible attacks on Melissa, an educator, to suggest that we all have a responsibility to make sure the children are educated to the best of their abilities and that parent get help from their community if they can't meet all the parenting responsibilities alone.
What circle of Hell do those people dwell in?
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)When I looked up his FB page to see if he is for real (he is), I also saw this graphic posted regarding Melissa's quote. I admit I was surprised that they were attacking that quote. Why am I ever surprised?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Melissa is suggesting what African American communities do all the time, look after each other's children. I think it's a great idea.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)in which people know their neighbors. It was certainly that way in farming and other rural communities a few decades ago in the US.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)whathehell
(29,065 posts)I think, though, that she might have worded it a bit better -- not that most non-wing nuts
wouldn't understand, but the Reich Wing is always looking for a Communist Plot somewhere.
On the other hand, it may not have mattered -- They went kind of nuts with Hillary's "It Takes A Village to Raise a Child", too.
tech3149
(4,452 posts)All the neighbors knew each other, we all played together and ran wild most of the time we weren't in school. When any of us did something that was out of line, there wasn't one who would let it go unnoticed. If they didn't handle it themselves, they would sure let our parents know.
What was that saying? "It takes a village to raise a child" Who said that anyway?
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)I'm sure she was quoting someone else when she said it back in the mid to late 90's, but I recall right-wingers going OFF about that comment. Any time "it takes a village" is mentioned since then, in any context, right-wingers deride the whole idea.
It's really so sad. For whatever reason, an entire segment of our population ridicules and demeans the whole idea of authentic community, compassion, and cooperation over competition.
Most of them also claim to be "good Christians," of course, though they also excuse their hatred with the umbrella statement that "we're all sinners."
They are terrified of everything. It sucks that they make life so much more difficult than it needs to be for the rest of us because of their fear and cowardice.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)ranting for months after it was published. All the while my sister & her 3 kids were living w/ my mom & dad. My parents took the kids to school, doctors, dentists, after school events, helped w/ homework. My dad even coached her son's little league team.
But don't get my mom started on Hillary Clinton and that book!
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)malaise
(268,885 posts)Ask Lyan Ryan and Rand Paul.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I'm wondering if we should report Fox News to the Southern Poverty Law Center. Maybe they will investigate and sue them. They are really effective at suing racist organizations and Fox is certainly that. But this is really a blatant attack on an idea that African Americans have practiced in the inner cities forever of looking after each other's children and raising them as a community. White people as a whole don't do that and wealthy white people like those Fox "news" personalities definitely don't because they all have nannies.
LeftInTX
(25,224 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Response to Cleita (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
patrice
(47,992 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)children should not be taught one religion but all religions including none.
When they are 18 they can choose if they wish to join.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It may seem crazy, but why shouldn't children understand that all religions, when it comes to the really, really important things, one, the same. If there is only one God, there can be only one religion. Right? So, if you teach children to appreciate all religions and to be intolerant of no religion, they will understand that.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)church with friends and even the Temple a couple of times for Friday night services with my Jewish friend. My mother told me to never tell anyone at school because she would be getting a call from the nuns, but she was very open to letting me explore other churches. I never joined another church and I'm not a Catholic today, but I was free to explore.
patrice
(47,992 posts)truth is true, it is also, by definition, inevitable. If one's truth can be falsified, why does one believe in it? If it can't be falsified, that will become apparent.
MattBaggins
(7,901 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)God or only one God. I suppose the exceptions are some aboriginal religions and maybe the Buddhists, perhaps Wikkans or people who take no stance. But they are not very numerous.
MattBaggins
(7,901 posts)If people think religion should be taught in schools then you must teach the idea of many gods as well
Cleita
(75,480 posts)widely practiced in the world today.
patrice
(47,992 posts)about ALL religions as part of their core curriculum, since religion is so omnipresent and so powerful and can have such huge everlasting effects upon their lives, whether they believe in one or not, they should know what religion is and how it works.
Another part of core curriculum should be about science, that is, how science works, not so much the content of sciences, as much as how it is possible to produce any kind of scientific knowledge, the rational basis of what makes knowledge knowledge.
Students should end up knowing what religion is and how it works and what science is and how it works and this should be accomplished as completely and as honestly and as objectively as possible.
niyad
(113,232 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)when I first saw the spot. My Gawd they went into full meltdown mode - Does Michele Malkin even have kids?
FreakLand vs NerdLand
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)As usual, the Right will contort anything to make a controversy.
Harris-Perry could have said the sky was blue and the Right would have found something to bitch about.
I don't know if it's willful ignorance, or if they are really that dense. I tend to believe the latter.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)Not really, I could care less about whatever BS Faux is spewing.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)"Community" is "COMMUNISM" Get it???
She wants to take away your kids and put them in Marxist Training Camps where they will learn about Unions. And as you all know, we fought in the Civil War because the Union Army tried to turn the Free People of the South into card carrying members of the ACLU!
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)"It Takes A Village" which didn't make sense then, and doesn't make sense with Melissa. Must have been a slow day when they chose to battle with her.
They should all be ashamed.
brewens
(13,566 posts)at least not completely. I would favor a system that does not encourage large family's. Maybe a larger tax break on the first kid, the same for a second, smaller for a third and then nothing beyond that. Reduce the incentive for having that third kid and then make them pay the full load for every additional kid. Of course that would be a little more practical had we not been looted so savagely the last thirty years. It's not so easy to get and keep a job that can support any size family these days. Slapping a bigger tax burden on some guy that lost his good job recently wouldn't fly.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)control their own fertility. That means access to contraceptives and abortion if necessary. Women will have only the children they want then. Many will choose to have none. It will balance out between the families with many children and the couples with no children.
If planned parenthood got the support they need to meet women's fertility needs instead of having to battle the religious right all the time, all would be well.
brewens
(13,566 posts)Those can be reliably reversed can't they? I have no clue.
I'm one that is very glad I was never part of an abortion but would not deny that to anyone that needs one. I'd hate it if one of my ex-girlfriends told me she had one 30 or so years ago, but I wouldn't blame her. I was a little unreliable at that age to say the least. I might feel that she should have given me a chance though. I did have a pattern of coming close to disaster and then pulling myself out in the nick of time. It could be that I would have gotten with the program and been a good father and husband. We'll never know. Since I was about 35, I wanted nothing to do with women that were interested in having children.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)They aren't free, but what if there were programs that would make them free for those who can't afford them?
love_katz
(2,578 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)and, outside the home, you can't heal the damage or replace the good that can be done by parents. But society has a role to play too. Although it is a lesser role, it is indispensable. Families have to have the support of the society around them.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)they need help. I read stuff like we have enough homeless children in my county to fill an elementary school. These parents need help, it's plain, and we as a community need to help them for the sake of their children. Living in shelters and getting a free lunch at school isn't enough although I think Melissa was speaking more about making sure they get a good education.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)discopants
(535 posts)Attacking "liberal" Harvard for some rapper performing there. Attacking "liberal" USC because of a cellphone video of a professor saying the GOP was mostly old white men. Now, attacking Perry as an educator.
O'Reilly does a segment on his show where he proves how wrong universities are, such as the other night there were several students who didn't know anything about Thatcher and his commentary that all universities are producing idiot students.
Seems their one thought is that colleges have only one purpose that is to promote anti-American values. They twist and contort Perry's comments to fit that faux outrage. And so it goes.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)Now I'm going to have to find it and watch it since it's getting more and more attention here. Apparently that professor is not tenured, so I guess that means his detractors will be trying to show him the door in a show of force.
What Melissa Perry was saying doesn't sound that much different then how a church is organized in any community. Isn't the saying I am my brother's keeper in the Bible? It's a pretty basic concept.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)It's their job to promote this kind of divisive unreality. They should be mocked continuously.
MattBaggins
(7,901 posts)"are a part of the community" rather than "belong to whole communities"
If she had done that and used "belong to" with parents and families the statement would have been more powerful.
randome
(34,845 posts)She is right, regardless, but the way she said it gives ammunition to the Conservatives, who don't appreciate having to use their brains for anything other than filler to keep their heads from imploding.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)His timeslot is tanking. America wants Ed.
Raine
(30,540 posts)but just can't get into Hayes. I don't feel like turning MSNBC on again after I switched to something else, by that time I'm get involved in other stuff.
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)malaise
(268,885 posts)right fugging now
Zorra
(27,670 posts)jambo101
(797 posts)They hate just about everything. Hate is their new knee jerk reaction to anything they dont agree with.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Those people are, like, on eleven or twelve decibels all the time.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Well we can be sure they all got the memo on what to go nuts about.
This is insanity but it's gone semi mainstream. The end game from where this country is is hard to figure out but unless enough people wake up soon I'm uneasy about where we're headed, especially if the Kochs or Murdoch get to buy up 90% of the media - too many low info lemmings in the US now.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)We're all such individual, unconnected people, that our children never get the value a community brings to life.
This may be a puny example, but I hang out in all kinds of forums, and one sticks out. It's a humor/art forum that is essentially self policed. The members value the forum so much that anyone who misbehaves gets an earful. I was shocked when I first noticed it ten years ago. I never expected the forum to last. But it has. There is no disruption. There are no ugly fights. It's beautiful and fun. I've never seen anything like it.
Melissa is so on to this. I'd love to hear more people get on board this idea.
My guess is the people who oppose it had horrible parents, and awful childhood experiences.
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)by Hillary Clinton about 20 years ago. New concept, that!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Republicans and conservatives (who are blindly full of illusions) claim no nation cares more for its kids. Then they crucify anyone who dares suggest that really, actually, wouldn't it be a good idea if the nation (community) cared for children.
Hypocrites.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)That was how traditional values worked. Conservatives used to believe in that, it "kept kids in line" knowing that just being out of eye sight of one's parents didn't give anyone a free ride. Conservatives are the ones who always claim kids need strong guidance or kids will grow up believing in "Lord of the Flies". The kids were always under a neighborhood watch. That was the old fashioned way.