Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 09:58 AM Apr 2013

White House Approves Rollback of Cleanup Standards for Nuclear Incidents

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock
The White House has given final approval for dramatically raising permissible radioactive levels in drinking water and soil following “radiological incidents,” such as nuclear power-plant accidents and dirty bombs. The final version, slated for Federal Register publication, is a win for the nuclear industry which seeks what its proponents call a “new normal” for radiation exposure among the U.S population, according Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER


Issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the radiation guides (called Protective Action Guides or PAGs) allow cleanup many times more lax than anything EPA has ever before accepted. These guides govern evacuations, shelter-in-place orders, food restrictions and other actions following a wide range of “radiological emergencies.” The Obama administration blocked a version of these PAGs from going into effect during its first days in office. The version given approval late last Friday is substantially similar to those proposed under Bush but duck some of the most controversial aspects:


In soil, the PAGs allow long-term public exposure to radiation in amounts as high as 2,000 millirems. This would, in effect, increase a longstanding one in 10,000 person cancer rate to a rate of 1 in 23 persons exposed over a 30-year period;


In water, the PAGs punt on an exact new standard and EPA “continues to seek input on this.” But the thrust of the PAGs is to give on-site authorities much greater “flexibility” in setting aside established limits; and
Resolves an internal fight inside EPA between nuclear versus public health specialists in favor of the former. The PAGs are the product of Gina McCarthy, the assistant administrator for air and radiation whose nomination to serve as EPA Administrator is taken up this week by the Senate.


http://ecowatch.com/2013/white-house-approves-rollback-of-cleanup-standards-nuclear-incidents/




this is an old graph. on safety

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House Approves Rollback of Cleanup Standards for Nuclear Incidents (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 OP
Most of what I've read says that there's no safe dose of radiation and that background byeya Apr 2013 #1
I think these new bush standards Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 #2
kick woo me with science Apr 2013 #3
kick woo me with science Apr 2013 #4
 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
1. Most of what I've read says that there's no safe dose of radiation and that background
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 10:46 AM
Apr 2013

radiation, which varies from place to place over the earth, can and does cause mutations.
So instead of protecting the lives of the citizens - especially the children and fetuses - the administration says, Tough, we'll be out of office before you get your cancer.

Nice.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
2. I think these new bush standards
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 01:05 PM
Apr 2013

are because of

'what is coming'
to make it normal and not to be alarmed with new readings.

To desensitize you to the violence they are doing to you.

I guess it a chain that's on the table now.
That we need to put on ourselves.

The Nazis did that

But all we now are the banks that ........

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House Approves Roll...