Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,051 posts)
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 06:32 PM Apr 2013

On the cusp of angry and "really pissed off"?

I do understand.

In the last election, people voted for Barack Obama over the Republicans because they did not agree with the Republican agenda. Barack Obama got over 5 million more votes than Mitt Romney.

They voted for the Republicans to compromise with Barack Obama and the Democrats. If they had wanted the Republican agenda, they would have voted for Mitt Romney.

Republicans believe "compromise" is a dirty word. In fact, John Boehner refused to even say the word in a interview with CBS. It is not in their vocabulary.

Voters do not go to the polls in order to vote someone in that can compromise with the losers, especially when the losers refuse to compromise on anything.

So it is understandable that people are angry and are on the verge of getting really pissed off...

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On the cusp of angry and "really pissed off"? (Original Post) kentuck Apr 2013 OP
Bingo. K&R MotherPetrie Apr 2013 #1
I Am A Vet And I Am Not Disabled And I Am Pissed Because I Know How Little Disabled Vets Get TheMastersNemesis Apr 2013 #2
Dems adopted principle-free pragmatism during Clinton's admin HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #3
They have to account for the Constitution though treestar Apr 2013 #4
this ignores that Republicans have gerrymandered voting districts RainDog Apr 2013 #13
There is that too treestar Apr 2013 #18
Except large areas elect few Republicans which means they want more change... Bluenorthwest Apr 2013 #14
Obama is becoming a huge, huge disappointment..I'm on SS and look forward to those little monmouth3 Apr 2013 #5
Kick! sarcasmo Apr 2013 #6
I've passed the "virge of pissed off" and am Progressive dog Apr 2013 #7
Not on the verge donnasgirl Apr 2013 #8
Pissed as hell. 840high Apr 2013 #9
More like bewildered damnedifIknow Apr 2013 #10
Corporate money and power, woo me with science Apr 2013 #15
They're angry because elections don't stop the greed. Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #11
Way past. I feel exactly the same way I felt when Bush was president. forestpath Apr 2013 #12
I feel worse. Flying Squirrel Apr 2013 #16
I feel worse too. forestpath Apr 2013 #17
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
2. I Am A Vet And I Am Not Disabled And I Am Pissed Because I Know How Little Disabled Vets Get
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 06:38 PM
Apr 2013

And I am troubled that Obama does not support teachers, public employees and unions. He seems to believe that we have to give up benefits we earned for the good of the nation when most of us have been giving up for over 30 years now. We are getting so far into the "reality twisted zone" right now I do not know what to think. All I hear is rhetoric but little else but crumbs come our way.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
3. Dems adopted principle-free pragmatism during Clinton's admin
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 06:39 PM
Apr 2013

I'm not saying Clinton did it, but it happened during his time in office.

If you go back and reread the papers, or if you go back and watch the videos of the talk shows you'll hear Newt and company talk about the Dems having no principles.

And it was true. Triangulation...which is merely moving toward your opponents position as in 'pre-emptive compromise'...was rampant. It was THE NEW GREAT SHINEY TOY OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICIANS.

When a person is willing to compromise their positions, you don't compromise, you let them do it. You let them pay the costs for it. You get what you want by just doing nothing....

hmmm sounds like the post-Clinton impeachment years doesn't it?


treestar

(82,383 posts)
4. They have to account for the Constitution though
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 06:40 PM
Apr 2013

They shouldn't have voted for the Republican in their district. They gave the House to the Republicans. This shows voters don't want any more change. While they are happy with the President (there may be some crossover voters).

Probably scared by Obamacare and don't want any other changes, as a result, Republican house and not-filibuster proof Senate. Once they realize it is not the great bogeyman, they may relax and finally keep the Republicans out of power.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
13. this ignores that Republicans have gerrymandered voting districts
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 09:24 PM
Apr 2013

and this makes it harder and harder to get them out of office, locally.

But if you look at various states, there are large pockets of liberals - mostly in urban areas, in every state.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
18. There is that too
Thu Apr 11, 2013, 12:04 PM
Apr 2013

But then that is happening because voters give the Republicans majorities in the state legislatures. Not very smart if they really want any social program at federal level.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
14. Except large areas elect few Republicans which means they want more change...
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 09:31 PM
Apr 2013

while all of the places that elect lots of Republicans also voted for Romney. The ones who gave the House to the GOP are not, were not happy with the President and they did not vote for him. How does that work. The districts that voted for Republicans did not vote for Obama...they voted for Romney. And you seem to think they won somehow.

monmouth3

(3,871 posts)
5. Obama is becoming a huge, huge disappointment..I'm on SS and look forward to those little
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 06:44 PM
Apr 2013

increases every few years. Goodbye to that too I'm sure.

Progressive dog

(6,898 posts)
7. I've passed the "virge of pissed off" and am
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 07:04 PM
Apr 2013

proceeding directly to rendered speechless.
So, while I still have a voice, compromise is a dirty word when it means that one side gives up food and healthcare in exchange for the a few of the unfair tax preferences that they gave nothing for.

donnasgirl

(656 posts)
8. Not on the verge
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 09:08 PM
Apr 2013

People are pissed off period, the man has just offered up exactly what the repigs wanted and what does he do HE GIVES IT TO THEM ON A PLATTER.

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)
10. More like bewildered
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 09:19 PM
Apr 2013

I can't wrap my brain around this at all. This is not good for anyone including the democratic party.

I can truly say Damned If I know.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
15. Corporate money and power,
Wed Apr 10, 2013, 09:39 PM
Apr 2013

corporate purchase of elections, both major parties, government, and the media.

It's really not mystifying at all. It's all about the money and the systemic changes they have purchased and continue to purchase with it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On the cusp of angry and ...