Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Doing the Math" by Paul Krugman at the NY Times
Doing the Mathby Paul Krugman at the NY Times
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/doing-the-math/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto
"SNIP..............................................
Wonkblog links to a lovely piece by E.O. Wilson on how much math you need to do research. Wilsons answer is, not much; and I agree with a caveat. The caveat is this: at least in the areas I work in, you do need some mathematical intuition, even if you dont necessarily need to know a lot of formal theorems.
Now, both Wilsons statements and mine should be taken with a grain of salt. A colleague once explained to me that the optimal amount of math for an economist to know is always, of course, exactly the amount of math you personally happen to know anyone who knows less just doesnt have the tools, anyone who knows more is excessively teched up. Hey, I think the kids these days are taught way too much math. Also, they should get off my lawn.
That said, Ive done pretty well with basic calculus plus intuition, mainly geometrical. My most techy paper (and also one of the most successful), on target zones (pdf and very, very wonkish) began with pictures; I didnt know any stochastic calculus, and picked up the little I needed after I had already figured out the papers main results.
But the intuition is crucial, and not just for writing academic papers. If youre going to talk about economics at all, you need some sense of how magnitudes play off against each other, which is the only way to have a chance of seeing how the pieces fit together. The vast amount of junk economics out there is dominated by people who dont think that way, who think in terms of slogans free markets good! printing money bad! rather than analysis. Or maybe the thing to say is that higher math isnt usually essential; arithmetic is.
..............................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 774 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Doing the Math" by Paul Krugman at the NY Times (Original Post)
applegrove
Apr 2013
OP
I too was good at geometry. But not calculus. Algebra I did fine. My intuition was good also.
applegrove
Apr 2013
#1
Nope. I got 100% in geometry in grade 11. I could work the proofs backwards in one
applegrove
Apr 2013
#4
applegrove
(118,462 posts)1. I too was good at geometry. But not calculus. Algebra I did fine. My intuition was good also.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)2. I bet your geometry teacher was better than your calculus teacher.
And if it had been the other way around you would have been better at calculus than geometry.
applegrove
(118,462 posts)4. Nope. I got 100% in geometry in grade 11. I could work the proofs backwards in one
go. I was a natural. Don't recall any of the proofs as we talk. Calculus needs a big memory for various functions. I was not good at remembering all those.
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)3. They need to emphasize intuition more.
The reason people have a hard time with calc is that in the beginning they have taking derivatives by hand, which puts you face to face with the biggest algebra equations you've ever seen in addition to the new material. Yet after that, normal people will compute them using a Mathematica. The key is understanding the intuition of what derivative and integral are.