General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNorth Korea is more despicable and dangerous than you imagine.
Prior to listening to an intereview on CBC radio with NK expert B.R. Myers author of The Cleanest Race: How North Koreans See Themselves and Why It Matters, I never knew about NK's rabid race based death cult ideology. NK is fixated with racial purity, for instance NK women who return pregnant from China are forced to submit to abortions and itsextreme militiary first ideology is basically a death cult - every child is told every day of the wonderful possibility of death by immolation in the service of the motherland and taught not to fear the idea of war, not even a nuclear one.
Here's some snippets of a 2010 review written by Christopher Hitchens
snip
Myers makes a persuasive case that we should instead regard the Kim Jong-il system as a phenomenon of the very extreme and pathological right. It is based on totalitarian "military first" mobilization, is maintained by slave labor, and instills an ideology of the most unapologetic racism and xenophobia.
These conclusions of his, in a finely argued and brilliantly written book, carry the worrisome implication that the propaganda of the regime may actually mean exactly what it says, which in turn would mean that peace and disarmament negotiations with it are a waste of timeand perhaps a dangerous waste at that.
snip
Unlike previous racist dictatorships, the North Korean one has actually succeeded in producing a sort of new species. Starving and stunted dwarves, living in the dark, kept in perpetual ignorance and fear, brainwashed into the hatred of others, regimented and coerced and inculcated with a death cult: This horror show is in our future, and is so ghastly that our own darling leaders dare not face it and can only peep through their fingers at what is coming.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2010/02/a_nation_of_racist_dwarfs.2.html
Mika
(17,751 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Just pointing out that some say that Castro eats babies as part Santería rituals. And many more gruesome and horrible stories.
Now, I've been to Cuba many times, seen the admiration and respect Cubans have for Castro, have never seen nor heard of baby eating as part of any rituals there, nor any of the gruesome stories peddled to us about Cuba's harsh dictatorship - so, I'm somewhat apprehensive when I read hyperbole such as above about "axis of evil" countries.
Doesn't mean that I defend inhumane militarized gov't.
From the last para of the Hitchens review in OP ...
"..living in the dark, kept in perpetual ignorance and fear, brainwashed into the hatred of others, regimented and coerced and inculcated with a death cult: This horror show is in our future .. "
Sounds familiar.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Really????
Kinda pathetic.
Mika
(17,751 posts)cliffordu
(30,994 posts)From the last para of the Hitchens review in OP ...
"..living in the dark, kept in perpetual ignorance and fear, brainwashed into the hatred of others, regimented and coerced and inculcated with a death cult: This horror show is in our future .. "
Sounds familiar.
Mika
(17,751 posts)Used all over the planet.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)As accurate.
Mika
(17,751 posts)lol.
TimberValley
(318 posts)Mika
(17,751 posts)Looks like a good read.
Still, some people say that Castro eats babies.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Mika
(17,751 posts)OK. Ignore away.
LooseWilly
(4,477 posts)I hate ignorance, so, I choose to remain ignorant (by using the ignore function when encountering differing opinions).
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)quit trying so hard.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)North Korea is a a very bad place to be a human being.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)But it rings true.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)path here of a pretty brainwashed compliant populace.
Iggo
(47,534 posts)Then again, I don't live in Seoul.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)One of my college buddies is married to a Chinese woman and lives in China.
spanone
(135,792 posts)Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Criticism of other countries is "beating the war drums" and we should keep our imperialist mouths shut so as not to aid the MIC in their goals.
Rex
(65,616 posts)And already know that NK is fucked and the citizens are starving to death. Been that way for decades, always wondered why we didn't just put the hammer down and finish the war.
TimberValley
(318 posts)I seem to recall that some people were advocating for the invasion of Iraq in 2003 because America "didn't finish the job in Iraq the first time." (meaning the 1991 Gulf War)
Rex
(65,616 posts)Never could understand why we couldn't work something out with China.
dsc
(52,152 posts)Basically we fought China to a tie in Korea and we had no desire to put in the troops to break the tie. The Korean War is why Truman left office with the lowest poll numbers in recorded history until Bush 2 came on the scene. Ike promised to end the war and end the war he did.
Rex
(65,616 posts)We did sign an armistice treaty, but that is it. Dunno, just seems like something could have been worked out by now. Something needs to be done, an entire country starving to death can be avoided.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)MacArthur wanted to kick NK & Chinese ass all the way to the Yalu a second time. Truman was afraid that such an action would lead to a wider war in Asia with the Russians supporting China by opening the European front. So he sacked MacArthur and replaced him with Ridgeway who had orders to fight to a tie, not a win. So we spent two years holding a line at about the 38th. Eisenhower started dropping hints that he was going to go to the Yalu and use nukes to get there. The truce was signed a few months after he was inaugurated.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Get a job, you damn hippies. Join the army! Get a hair cut! The KKK is looking for you, boy. 7 million in prison and counting. We are a Christian nation. Gawd, guns and gays win elections, and Diebold.
This all started when N Korea invaded Vietnam, right? Or was that Iraq?
Rah, rah, rah! $1 trillion defense budget. USA!
I love my country, but not the killer right part. Bush was their hero, now not so much, but he was!
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Obama is not chickenhawk Bush. Aggression will not be tolerated and forgotten. Ask Bin Laden. Oh wait, you can't...
rmax
(93 posts)We've got multiple (conventional) weapons locked on every military installation they have. It's easy to spot them - they're the ones with lights on at night. The entire rest of the country is dark. One shot. One shot. That's all it will take and there will be no N. Korean military. This isn't 1953 anymore, but they're still stuck there.
Kim Jong Un is a moron. The country is being run by generals who weren't even born by 1953. He's nothing more than a puppet, a prop if you will. If they are so deluded to think they can take on the rest of the world, so be it. Nothing good will come of it.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Volaris
(10,266 posts)a lot of those Death Cultists are going to get their wish. Here's the thing though:
The complete destruction of that Government will take (at a rough guess) 60-90 days. The "re-unification" of the peninsula under a not insane government will take 60-90 YEARS. Maintaining order and rebuilding the North after the destruction of the aforementioned Government will make the 8-year occupation of Baghdad look like child's play. It will take GENERATIONS to unbrainwash the General Population up there, because mostly, you will have to simply wait for a lot of them to die of old age, and plan for the provision of their almost every human need until then.
Destroying the government up there is the EASY part. We can start that project on Tuesday if we want to. We are NOT prepared for what will come AFTER that, and neither is the Government in Seoul.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Before this was relatively safe to do. I believe the hope was that the new leader would be rational. Unfortunately he doesn't appear to be, and I believe they are rapidly running out of time. Nuclear weapons without delivery systems are bad, but manageable. Nuclear weapons coupled with functional long range missiles is another matter. The Japanese wouldn't tolerate it, and I doubt the Chinese are keen on the idea either.
I wonder if North Korea sees it. Not the people, who worship the Dear Leader as a god, but their leadership. I wonder if they understand that they are almost out of time.
Volaris
(10,266 posts)to actually believe they can win by themslves (as in China won't play ball, and Russia's attitude will quickly devolve to "Yeah... that was a pretty dumb thing of you to do" .
If they do believe that, it shouldn't take but a week of bombing thier military infrastructure with ABSOLUTE impunity on our part for them to change their minds. Like we should bomb them for a week, and then a week of NOT, where we say, "look, NOW you know what you're up against, let it go."
If it comes to shots fired, I think the best footing is to give them an incentivized "out" that allows them to re-establish the cease-fire, and go back to telling the slaves how great they are, now that they got the Enemy to "agree to the Great Leaders terms, rather than face emminent destruction at the hands of the NKorean Army." or whatever such propogandistic nonesense they need to come up with.
And you're right. Japan won't tolerate it, even though I'm not sure how much they can do about it. Their Navy is OUR Navy, for all practical purposes at this point in their history, and while I don't know what the limits are on their Air Force after the Imperial surrender (if any), as a first-world modern economic power I can't imagine the Japenese would consign themselves to flying second-rate planes with third-rate pilots, so it seems likely that if they are legally allowed to do so, they could wreak some pretty decent havoc on the NK leadership, and could do it from the relative saftey of their own land-based runways...
So, good luck with all that Lil Kim.
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)I don't believe that their military commanders believe they can win (or I hope not) my concern is that they do not understand that the violent rhetoric and threats and aggression will no longer be tolerated when they gain the ability to strike Japan or the United States.
As for what Japan can do, one concern is that they will choose to become a nuclear power themselves. They certainly have the material and knowlege and could probably begin assembling weapons immediately if they chose to do so. This would, for obvious reasons, help destabilize the region. The Chinese damn sure wouldn't be happy. So you know, the Japanese Air Force is about as state of the art as it is possible to get. They use a lot of heavily modified US equipment -- so modified that it is essentially their own designs. Basically they are US aircraft but better.
But no one wants war with Korea. The human cost would be unimaginable.
Volaris
(10,266 posts)and yes you are correct. No one WANTS a war with Korea. But yeah, if they push, there are enough 'vital interests" in the region that too many States WON'T fuck around with putting them down.
Thanks also for clarification on Japanese capability=)
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)drum roll, please...
the Unification Church.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)I am not happy with any of this. All I know is that my Spidey sense is zinging all mover the place about Un. He is an true believer. They are dangerous.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)and how long we're willing to wait to act. Until they finally have successful long-range missiles to hit us with? Scary shit.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)The other factor I was thinking of as I was reading this thread ... this is a delusional government/populace. Many have been fed this BS for a long time. We see the consequences ... they might intellectually, perhaps, but not at a gut level IMO. Most there IMO are a bunch of robots waiting for someone to pull their string! As you say, "Scary shit." The messages they are spewing are unbelievable ... giving more and more indication of why they need to be, somehow, reined in.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)a minimum of several hundred thousand dead South Koreans - probably much, much more - and the destruction of much of South Korea's transport, energy and industrial infrastructure. - With close to two millions North Korean troops just north of Seoul's northern suburbs armed with one of the world's largest supplies of artillery and short range missiles - this would be accomplished within minutes - Preemptive strike or not there would be little defense against such an attack.
North Korea's fate would undoubtedly be much worse - much worse, of course. But even assuming total military victory over North Korea came very quickly - millions of half-starved and desperate North Koreans refugees will be doing everything they can to escape to an already battered and devastated South Korea.
It must not be forgotten that the Clinton Administration were in fact negotiating a viable agreement with North Korea that would have brought an end to their nuclear weapons program, defused the tensions and normalized relationships. The Bush Administration dramatically changed course as we all know and placed North Korea in the "Axis of Evil" - thus in North Korea's mind they were affectively being told that they can expect a future attack. As wretched as this regime is - I think it is fair to say that we should have stayed on course with the Clinton Administration's policy.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Don't you remember how we were told how lovely it is?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1193414
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)That place gives me the SERIOUS willies.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)No traffic in any of the streets.
The construction shovel has no signs of use, no dirt, paint is spotless.
Pictures of the people don't have anybody at all in the background. No people just wandering past.
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)dtom67
(634 posts)I own stock in DTom Industries. Step right up and get your DTom missile defense units! Don't forget your complimentary "smoking gun/mushroom cloud" T -shirts!
Just remember your position 10 or 15 years from now, when Hubris II comes out.
Maybe we can help them like we "helped" the People of Iraq.
I don't support any foreign government, but that does'nt mean I have to support a pre -emptive strike on them......
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)And, of course, give mountains of money to the MIC.
B2G
(9,766 posts)I suggest you watch the documentary. Maybe you'd be less glib.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Try actually thinking, rather than just lazily assuming that anyone who opposes the US can't be all that bad.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I thin Kim is a bad character. Saddam was a bloody dictator. Even Uncle Ho was no angel.
But, we've gotten ourselves into bloody, unnecessary wars and done equally awful things "defending" ourselves against bad guys to the point we've become bad guys.
"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)origins of NK ideology....Imperial Japan, not Communism.
There's really little point in negotiating with NK.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)They don't like it there either.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)When Un told Rodman to tell the President to call him, it reminded me of young boy whose parents do not allow him to use the phone, but did not stop calls from coming in to avoid criticism of their control of the man.
I think he's being watched by the old crazies.....he grew up in Sweden, didn't he (I think), and likes a lot of American stuff...
I wish the President would call him, but he's under the same restraint from the crazies in our own government...
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Just read something about Sweden in Discussions, oh well.
I still make the point that "call me" is the same as "they're watching every move I make..." and they're telling him "the Americans, including Rodman, don't give a dam about you."
Oh, I know what it was, without looking it up, it was llamas. They're going to try them out to save their sheep from wolves.
I remember everything eventually.
Thank you for reading my post.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Why, they're barely even human anymore! They're a new sub-species of human!
When I read that last paragraph, I immediately picture something like Gollum from Lord of the Rings. I suppose if we make the North Koreans somehow less human, it will make it more acceptable when we inevitably bomb the living hell out of them.
Has Kim Jong-Un begun ripping babies out of incubators?
Clarification: I know perfectly well that Kim Jong-Un is a ruthless dictator. My post is not meant to defend North Korea in any way, shape, or form. Rather, it's a contemplation on our need to somehow demonize the other side, make them seem inferior, almost as if bombing and killing them would be doing them a service.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)They approved a NUCLEAR ATTACK ON US.
That isn't demonic enough for you?
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)North Korea threatening a nuclear attack on the US carries about as much weight as if I were to threaten to blow up the moon.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)"Tsk. We did that to justify war against N. Korea."
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)First of all, there is absolutely NO evidence that North Korea even has the ability to fit a nuclear warhead on a missile.
Secondly, there is absolutely no evidence that North Korea is mobilizing their troops for war.
Finally, North Korea knows that if they were foolish enough to use nuclear weapons, Pyongyang would be vaporized and it would mean the end of the Kim dynasty.
Everything indicates this is simply part of their usual game, making threats under the assumption that the US will eventually give them concessions. The only thing different this time is that it's a new leader in charge, one who isn't used to playing the game, so the intensity has been ratcheted up.
It's possible North Korea may conduct some sort of limited military action as they've done in the past - shelling an island, launching a torpedo at a SK ship, etc. If that were to happen, then it could escalate into serious combat. However, there is absolutely nothing to indicate that NK is serious about starting a war or using nuclear weapons.
former9thward
(31,940 posts)There have been two nuclear attacks in history and neither came by missile. In the modern era bombs can go by plane, ships and even suitcases.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)RKP5637
(67,086 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)There are many similiar institutions, some of them clustered in the northeast near the border with Russia, and one of them reportedly has a chamber that sounds a lot like the infamous Gas Bell from We where prisoners die slow, agonizing deaths in a cloud of the latest gas produced by North Korea's military labs. God only knows how many people were tortured to death in the DPRK Gas Bell.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)PolitFreak
(236 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)He is in the magical spirit world now where all spirits have free love and unicorn spirits provide free milk for all!
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)marcusc81
(15 posts)You're right on most accounts. However, NK basketball rules dictate that dunks are worth like 8 points, which must make the game more interesting IMO
JVS
(61,935 posts)them more dangerous.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)It will have to be a lot better than this to make me think any war action should be taken. There are brutal war lords committing unspeakable atrocities in Africa, and yet we do nothing about it. There is evil in many, many places around the world, in different regimes.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)and reduce sanctions.
This does make me ask, what if they really do intend to fight a war, a nuclear war, and go out in a blaze of glory, or think that they can win big by being the last survivors in a graveyard. as Their way of saying, "It is better to burn than to fade away."
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Just a coincidence.