General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGreenwald really nails it today re “speaking ill of the dead.”
Margaret Thatcher and misapplied death etiquetteThe dictate that one 'not speak ill of the dead' is (at best) appropriate for private individuals, not influential public figures
by: Glenn Greenwald
......................
............................
..............there's something distinctively creepy - in a Roman sort of way - about this mandated ritual that our political leaders must be heralded and consecrated as saints upon death. This is accomplished by this baseless moral precept that it is gauche or worse to balance the gushing praise for them upon death with valid criticisms. There is absolutely nothing wrong with loathing Margaret Thatcher or any other person with political influence and power based upon perceived bad acts, and that doesn't change simply because they die. If anything, it becomes more compelling to commemorate those bad acts upon death as the only antidote against a society erecting a false and jingoistically self-serving history.
.....
so much more:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/08/margaret-thatcher-death-etiquette
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)I will be grave dancing nonstop until I can't stand up any more.
SamKnause
(13,101 posts)I agree with you Mr. Greenwald !
haikugal
(6,476 posts)I'll be unapologetically joining you on that grave...dancing! When will people wakeup?!
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)politician dies. They're no longer in government and everything Thatcher did was quite some time ago. She's dead. We all die.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)people and whole communities, including her country, that she destroyed. Had she been, IF she were to be buried quietly somewhere, rather than given the usual royal send off these leaders, both here and there, are given at which history is rewritten and the victims have no say, fine. But since these rituals as in her boyfriend, Reagan's case, are becoming even more useful for the criminal leaders who have destroyed so much of our planet, to write a history of lies, it has become imperative to put an end to that.
Reagan was help up as some kind of mythical 'leader' for over a week. While the people of the countries whose dictators he supported as they murdered innocent people, looked on and wondered 'how could this be'. How could Americans let that happen.
I used to ignore grave-dancing for the evil leaders of the world, it was enough that they were gone. But not anymore.
I hope Cheney is watching the celebrations of her death, and Bush and all the rest of them who worry so much about their legacies. They got away with their crimes so far, but they cannot control the legacies they care so much about. While they would love to see Thatcher revered and praised in death, they are not going to see that. Let it be a reminder to them that all their money and power will have no power over how the world writes their legacies.
Great article as usual by Greenwald, one of the most read and best Liberal bloggers around. Always tells the truth, which is why he has so much credibility with Democrats and respect even from Republicans who recognize the futility of trying to prove him wrong.
jollyreaper2112
(1,941 posts)He's saying what I'm thinking but far more eloquently.
kath
(10,565 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)I really dislike Greenwald.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)But hey you dislike Greenwald....guess that makes it okey dokey.
cali
(114,904 posts)I said not one negative thing about her. I speculated that she may have been involved, based upon a number of factors. I was wrong, but it's hardly "saying shit", genius.
Not to mention that it's an egregiously stupid comparison.
Yikes, honey, it burns.
Response to cali (Reply #12)
HangOnKids This message was self-deleted by its author.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Or told you are a "genius" it is all such good DU love.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)that's some egregious shit right there
Go for it girl!
grantcart
(53,061 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)They are imperfect humans as we all are imperfect. Just as all of us have done, those who die have done good things in their life and bad things in their life. They deserve neither sainthood nor hatred.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Gee I feel really bad that somebody called Pol Pot an asshole too.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)....Nah.
pink-o
(4,056 posts)because of Thatcher's heartless policies, then I don't think you'd be so sensitive to the grave-dancing!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)all is unicorns and fairydust when they die?
Now THAT is creepy. And vile and disgusting.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Because nothing says "I'm Grieving" like my little pony.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)even after they die.
hitler was imperfect too.
valerief
(53,235 posts)qazplm
(3,626 posts)basic respect to not speak ill of the dead.
I wouldn't have agreed with much of her positions, but I suspect she did the best she thought she could and knew. Being wrong, even a lot, is not a reason to speak ill of someone in and of itself.
I need a lot more than that. Bush for example I hold in a different category.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Why are you forgiving her?
zeemike
(18,998 posts)If you say nothing, and her supporters use the media to turn her into a saint and it goes down in history as her being a saint, you have cooperated with evil by your silence.
To someone else that does not have media to promote the lie that he or she was some kind of saint I would say nothing bad about their death....but not with people like this who kill many and punish even more...We must never speak good of it and never let the bad be forgotten.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I appreciate the distinction Greenwald makes between public, elected officials versus your average citizen...and I agree.
markpkessinger
(8,395 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)She hated the poor, she hated women, she left behind a legacy of harm for so many people and the results of her vile policies are still causing harm to so many people.
There are few times when I approve of grave-dancing, but when a cruel, compassionless, harmful person like Thatcher dies, that is one of them.
Great article by Greenwald.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)It's too bad I don't believe in Hell, because she certainly deserved to roast in it!
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)than paying fake homage to someone you despised when they were alive.
Martin Eden
(12,864 posts)We certainly have plenty of that right here in the states!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)acceptable to me to express your distaste for a human. To those that say we shouldnt "rush out" and disparage someone that dies is way off. That's the best time. How long do you wait? Why wait?
I try not to hate. But damn if I will accept the saint-ification of someone terrible just because they died.
Thacher did harm to a lot of people and deserves to be disparaged.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)"They say you shouldn't say nothin' about the dead unless it's good. She's dead. Good"!
olddots
(10,237 posts)They were both about 9 when she was is power .
Conservatism has become anti human progress .
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Best liberal blogger around.
MinM
(2,650 posts)whopis01
(3,510 posts)is that nothing really changes with her death.
If it is important to someone to get out there and celebrate then more power to them. I certainly have no problem with that. And maybe it is a good balance to the automatic worship that always pops up when a leader - good, bad, or otherwise - dies.
But nothing is different today because of her death. The world hasn't changed. So it feels like a hollow victory celebration to me.