Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

srican69

(1,426 posts)
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:13 PM Apr 2013

5 years into the Obama presidency ...

No one even raises the tax rates for Hedge Fund managers ... ( they pay 15% on their deferred salary - for no good reason) ...while the rest of us 'those people' get buggered - I pay 15% in FICA alone on my 1099 income ( I am a contractor) plus Federal and State Income taxes get piled on top ...

But HedgeFundies .. Oh No .. you cant tax their income as you do for the regular folks .... you are damaging capitalism !!

Its not even an issue - wonder why is that? Despite all the talk of deficits ... not a peep on tax fairness.




4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5 years into the Obama presidency ... (Original Post) srican69 Apr 2013 OP
Because the President can set taxes? frazzled Apr 2013 #1
This is a reprise of the first year of his term Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #3
Four years and three months, actually. randome Apr 2013 #2
Corporate media have brainwashed the population cprise Apr 2013 #4

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. Because the President can set taxes?
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:25 PM
Apr 2013

Because I'm sure you know he (or she) cannot. Yet Obama has proposed killing the tax loophole for hedge fund managers; it was proposed in a budget he submitted early on:

If there is one tax loophole that looks dead in the water, it's the law that lets hedge fund and private equity managers pay a 15-percent capital-gains rate on the multimillion-dollar fees they collect -- substantially less than the top income tax rates paid by their secretaries, chauffeurs, and the pilots of their private jets.

On the surface, the stars are aligned. There is a newly elected Democrat in the White House who is desperate to raise revenues. His budget calls for killing this tax break to raise $14.75 billion over five years and $23.89 billion over ten years. In addition, there are Democratic House and Senate majorities - representing the party of working people - and what could more unfair than letting billionaires pay taxes at a fraction of the rate of the guy with the lunch pail?


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/26/will-the-taxman-cometh_n_170082.html


Ask why it is that Congress has not permitted this to happen since going back to the Bush and Clinton administrations? Ask one of your senators, who gets money from hedge-fund managers.
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
3. This is a reprise of the first year of his term
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 01:39 PM
Apr 2013

Screaming, howling, gnashing of teeth, wringing of hands because he didn't deliver on his promises. We pleaded for patience, but the usual suspects would get red-faced and declare their regret for voting for him.

DOMA
Iraq
Don't Ask Don't Tell
etc, etc, etc.

And when he delivered? Retractions? Of course not. DU simply moves on to the next thing that sets their hair on fire.



cprise

(8,445 posts)
4. Corporate media have brainwashed the population
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 03:13 PM
Apr 2013

...to at least doubt their own interests are legitimate. It employs a constant cycle of distraction from what is really going on until it is too late. It negatively portrays average wage earners and unemployed, while idolizing the rich and their schemes. It tries to get people to spend and consume as much as possible.

That's why.



Watch this BBC mini series from the 90s and you'll understand why most people won't engage with the issues.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 years into the Obama pr...