Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:46 AM Apr 2013

When your opponent seeks to criminalize oral sex within marriage...

it is probably okay to run on that directly. No need for insinuations that he is 'too extreme'... you can actually say, "My opponent wants it to be a felony in Virginia for a married couple to engage in oral sex."

Because it happens to be true.

Ken Cucinelli is, in fact, seeking to restore the legality of Virginia's laws against "unnatural" sex acts that were struck down by the Supreme Court in 2003. (Lawrence v. Texas)

Terry McAuliffe, or whoever runs against Cucinelli, should be willing to spell that out.

There is a dynamic where your opponent is so offensively crazy that he gets a pass because his insanity is so offensive that it drags down anyone who even talks about it.

But I think we should own this issue... it is probably okay to take an affirmative stand for the right of married couples to have sex however they prefer.

Even in Virginia.


On the bright side, if somehow Cucinelli got his way the "Virginia is for Lovers" tourism slogan could be replaced with a billboard of a State trooper saying, "Get kinky in Virginia and we supply the handcuffs."
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When your opponent seeks to criminalize oral sex within marriage... (Original Post) cthulu2016 Apr 2013 OP
Good grief! HappyMe Apr 2013 #1
Isn't "Cucinelli" another word for cunnilingus? NightWatcher Apr 2013 #2
No need for specifics that might turn some people off. randome Apr 2013 #3
"No Country For Old Men". nt bemildred Apr 2013 #4
You gotta wonder about their own sex lives.... Bigmack Apr 2013 #5
Perhaps he heard that people wanted to ban Hummers KurtNYC Apr 2013 #6
If I were running against Ken, I'd ask him Raven Apr 2013 #7
Well, DUH, the state's name starts with a VIRGIN! ChairmanAgnostic Apr 2013 #8
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
3. No need for specifics that might turn some people off.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:52 AM
Apr 2013

Cucinelli's opponent just needs to say, "My opponent wants the government to intrude on a married couple's sex lives."

That's better.

Hit them over the head with their own 'Keep the government out of our lives' mantra.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
5. You gotta wonder about their own sex lives....
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:55 AM
Apr 2013

.... or maybe NOT wonder. Probably best to not even think about it.

Those people spend a lot of time talking about things like "man on dog" and some really deviant shit that has never crossed my mind... and I've been told my mind is relatively kinky.

Raven

(13,889 posts)
7. If I were running against Ken, I'd ask him
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:58 AM
Apr 2013

how this law would be enforced...Bedroom Police? I'd make fun of him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When your opponent seeks ...