Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 12:00 PM Apr 2013

Pentagon Spent $900 Million for Obsolete Fighter Vehicle Spare Parts


Pentagon Spent $900 Million for Obsolete Fighter Vehicle Spare Parts


The Stryker, an eight-wheeled, 20-ton armored fighting vehicle used by the U.S. military in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, has become an example of how much damage bad accounting and poor warehousing can cost U.S. taxpayers.

While military planners focused on the conflicts overseas, someone failed to notice that the Army wasted $900 million on Stryker replacement parts that became outdated and, thus, unusable.

The Pentagon’s inspector general discovered that at least $57 million in obsolete infrared equipment was bought by the Army, but never installed in Strykers. No one in the Army noticed this snafu until the IG’s office pointed it out during the audit.

Another blunder: The Army spent more than half a million dollars to buy 9,179 small replacement gears called pinions to temporarily rectify a Stryker suspension problem that surfaced between 2007 and 2009. The Army fixed the problem in 2010, but kept buying pinions. As a result, only 15 of the pinions were ever used.

http://www.allgov.com/news/where-is-the-money-going/pentagon-spent-900-million-dollars-for-obsolete-fighter-vehicle-spare-parts-130407?news=849664
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon Spent $900 Million for Obsolete Fighter Vehicle Spare Parts (Original Post) The Straight Story Apr 2013 OP
Damn, that would buy a lot of cat food and peas. Autumn Apr 2013 #1
Yeah, I'm sure that was all a "mistake" arcane1 Apr 2013 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon Spent $900 Milli...