Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:00 PM Apr 2013

Senior Citizens Voted for Romney in large number... Why not let them have GOP-lite?

Just a question. If the question is between dealing with student debt or building a modern infrastructure for the future, why sacrifice that for a group that said in the voting booth they want these policies?

Edit: Exit Poll to show the data of Senior Citizens voting for Obama. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president/exit-polls

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senior Citizens Voted for Romney in large number... Why not let them have GOP-lite? (Original Post) BrentWil Apr 2013 OP
i'm a senior citizen and i have never DesertFlower Apr 2013 #1
But a large majority did. NT BrentWil Apr 2013 #2
Me either newfie11 Apr 2013 #3
my senior republican friend voted DesertFlower Apr 2013 #11
What a load of garbage duffyduff Apr 2013 #4
That's the hard pill Newest Reality Apr 2013 #6
You are absolutely correct. darkangel218 Apr 2013 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Leslie Valley Apr 2013 #5
Yep. The President doesn't owe a majority of senior citizens a damn thing... nt Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #7
You also hope for nonvoters to be made homeless. Union Scribe Apr 2013 #10
silly me. Niceguy1 Apr 2013 #8
Yes, but it is about choices... BrentWil Apr 2013 #13
because we dont treat Niceguy1 Apr 2013 #15
I only suggest that life is about choices.... BrentWil Apr 2013 #16
well if you Niceguy1 Apr 2013 #17
Because in punishing them you will fuck over yourself and generations to come. Union Scribe Apr 2013 #9
change social security so it punishes younger recipients as a way to punish older voters? CreekDog Apr 2013 #12
Collective punishment? oldhippie Apr 2013 #14

DesertFlower

(11,649 posts)
11. my senior republican friend voted
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:34 PM
Apr 2013

repub but she really wants hillary to run in '16 so she can vote for her.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
4. What a load of garbage
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:14 PM
Apr 2013

BOTH parties are in bed with the same interests out to ruin the country.

They AREN'T working for us.

THAT is the problem.

With Romney there was a chance the Democrats would actually act like an opposition party; with Obama doing the SAME THING, they are neutralized.

You tell me which is worse.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
6. That's the hard pill
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:22 PM
Apr 2013

for everyone to swallow, my friend.

It sounds like indulging in an anti-establishment rant, but when you investigate the bigger picture and see beyond the Simulated hyper-real projection into the collective experience by media, politicians and corporations, it becomes more tangible and clear.

Maybe the alarm will go off and more people will wake-up one morning with a sense of courage that allows them to admit that they are projecting "hopes for change" while they are merely coping with a cognitive dissonance that leaves them coping with strange.

We are losing it all and, if major corporations and their control of and influence in politics, media, entertainment, food, education, and everything else, is not reigned in and curtailed, it is not hard to extrapolate the legacy our children and their children will be left with. In fact, we are already slipping down that slope faster every day.

Back to total tyranny? Living in manufactured consent and enveloped in propaganda backed by Draconian laws in a military industrial complex? Sounds like a dystopia that is not worth living in, especially if most of us are going to get a third-world environment eventually.

Response to BrentWil (Original post)

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
8. silly me.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:31 PM
Apr 2013

All of this time I thiught that politicians were supposed to do what b is best for the country. .not exact petty revenge and treat people different based on their political class.

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
13. Yes, but it is about choices...
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:35 PM
Apr 2013

What is the bigger priority, student loan debt, infrastructure, health care for the poor.....

In a World which the GOP controls the House and reasonable high debt, something will have to give. Why shouldn't this play some factor in deciding?

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
15. because we dont treat
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:44 PM
Apr 2013

People different based on how they are registered to vote and it isnt very progressive to suggest that we do so.

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
16. I only suggest that life is about choices....
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:55 PM
Apr 2013

And why protect a group that doesn't reward you for this benefit when it is a bigger deal for your supporters to deal with student loans or to build an infrastructure for the future.

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
17. well if you
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 07:03 PM
Apr 2013

A are into choices then student loans are a choice. ..no one is forced to borrow money.



Old age isnt a choice. Thus SS is more important.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
9. Because in punishing them you will fuck over yourself and generations to come.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:33 PM
Apr 2013

How about that? And how about because liberals don't try to punish demographics with horrible policies?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
12. change social security so it punishes younger recipients as a way to punish older voters?
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:34 PM
Apr 2013

even though younger voters supported Obama?

that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senior Citizens Voted for...