General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama: My budget is not "ideal," it's a "compromise"
ByJake Miller / CBS News/ April 6, 2013, 10:48 AM
Obama: My budget is not "ideal," it's a "compromise"
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57578261/obama-my-budget-is-not-ideal-its-a-compromise/
President Obama said in his weekly address Saturday that his 2014 budget, due to be released Wednesday, is "not my ideal plan" but "it's a compromise I'm willing to make in order to move beyond a cycle of short-term, crisis-driven decision making."
His plan, Mr. Obama said, would balance investments with spending cuts, allocating money for infrastructure, domestic energy, education and job training while simultaneously reducing the deficit by closing tax loopholes for the rich and implementing spending cuts, including adjustments to Social Security and Medicaid.
Though the budget is yet to be released, Republicans have preemptively slammed the president for the plan's new spending proposals. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, rejected the budget, said it was "no way to lead and move the country forward" and called on the president to reform entitlement programs without demanding additional revenue in return.
Even some liberals have raised objections about the plan's entitlement reforms, which include a reduction in Social Security beneficiaries' annual cost-of-living adjustments. "I am terribly disappointed and will do everything in my power to block President Obama's proposal to cut benefits for social security recipients," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with the Democrats, in a statement on Friday.
<<snip>>
nruthie
(466 posts)and the Republicans once again call the shots. What was that last election all about anyway?
JHB
(37,158 posts)"not my ideal plan" is a long way from "I was trolling them, and they took the bait. Can you believe how nutty they are?"
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)He should have started with "his ideal plan" and compromised from there.
OhioChick
(23,218 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)the social safety net either.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)It's like Babe Ruth might have gotten 1100 home runs, had the leader before him had 1099,
but the leader before him Roger Connor only had 138 and Babe passed him with the 139th.
Barry Bonds needed to get 756 before he passed the current leader
JHB
(37,158 posts)How does leading off with concessions to repeatedly-and-still intransigent radical Republicans on the "third rail" accomplish that? Or what is he trying to accomplish?
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)To paraphrase Rush Limbaugh of all people- YES, we do want the republican party annihiliated for all time FORWARD.
Complete.
100%
gone.
Instead of instant gratification, it takes time
Took 45 years of going backwards 29 of those 45(and the stop/start basically reset the clock each time and went even further backwards)
Look what happened in the USSR
Gorby tore down the walls
Putin put them back up
because people were in a rush after Gorby tore them down and Putin spoke better and convinced them the old way was better.
Instant gratification just leaves one hungry 10 minutes later.
Dotting all the I's and crossing all the T's makes it next to impossible to overturn.
KG
(28,751 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)They don't get it, do they? We have a Democratic President, why don't we just roll over and play dead? After all, it's good practice.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)economic document is also a moral one. Offering to give up your principles is not moral. Hurting seniors is not moral.
pansypoo53219
(20,968 posts)the credit card party has no say. NONE.