Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Goddamnit! Social Security contributes not one red cent to the deficit!!!! (Original Post) Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2013 OP
Shout this out to the rafters, into the streets and everywhere. Cleita Apr 2013 #1
Thank you. Yes we definitely need to keep repeating this to anybody and everybody that will listen. liberal_at_heart Apr 2013 #2
Maybe we should REFUSE to work for ANY DEMOCRATS until this is taken OFF THE TABLE! SugarShack Apr 2013 #3
With things like this, turnout is going to be very poor for the mid-terms. Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2013 #7
Yes. And they're going to eventually eliminate it anyway. MrSlayer Apr 2013 #4
“If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal.” ~ Emma Goldman Fantastic Anarchist Apr 2013 #5
It's the biggest lie since the wmd's of Iraq. n/t L0oniX Apr 2013 #6
“Social Security represents America at its best, and now it is up to you to defend it," midnight Apr 2013 #8
What is wrong with this president...? lib2DaBone Apr 2013 #14
Our President has described himself as Reagan Democrat and Reagan believed people needed midnight Apr 2013 #26
Because he's always wanted to alarimer Apr 2013 #9
Obama: "I agree with Romney. I agree with Romney. I agree with Romney. I agree with Romney." blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #10
It's a bargaining chip. Doesnt have to affect the deficit. He knows it appeals to the rEpubs. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #11
Because it's a nice big tempting pot of money that already rich people want to get their hands on. Matariki Apr 2013 #12
They already took between $1.7 and $2.7trillion. They do not want to pay it back. savannah43 Apr 2013 #15
Good Question... K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2013 #13
He's a Phlem Apr 2013 #16
it's our money he wants to give away PatrynXX Apr 2013 #17
There's no question in my mind that it IS a bluff, TBH. AverageJoe90 Apr 2013 #20
This is what I think too rainy Apr 2013 #21
Yeah, I agree. Let's hope it pays off.....n/t AverageJoe90 Apr 2013 #28
Reduce SS benefits, sulphurdunn Apr 2013 #18
We should mail this 840high Apr 2013 #19
I really don't know WHAT the President is doing... ReRe Apr 2013 #22
Of course it doesnt contribute to the deficit FA but cstanleytech Apr 2013 #23
Bernie Sanders is making outstanding zeeland Apr 2013 #24
Of course it does. The perceived deficit in the pockets of a privileged few. /nt TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #25
Hmm... Heywood J Apr 2013 #27

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
2. Thank you. Yes we definitely need to keep repeating this to anybody and everybody that will listen.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:03 PM
Apr 2013

Not that the politicians will listen, but we still need to keep repeating it.

 

SugarShack

(1,635 posts)
3. Maybe we should REFUSE to work for ANY DEMOCRATS until this is taken OFF THE TABLE!
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:07 PM
Apr 2013

No calls, no door knocking, no cash, no food, NOTHING! We can get this shit staying home.
Now I won't say I told you so, but if you want to do something about this...do NOTHING as the mid terms approach. And tell that Little Debbie Wasserman Shultz!

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
7. With things like this, turnout is going to be very poor for the mid-terms.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:18 PM
Apr 2013

Then they'll blame us leftists for not giving Obama what he needs to govern. I'm really starting to think that some right-wing man-behind-the-curtain is rubbing his palms together and laughing with his brilliant plan to foist a faux progressive on us.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
4. Yes. And they're going to eventually eliminate it anyway.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:08 PM
Apr 2013

They don't care what the facts are and they don't care what we think.

What's wrong with the President? He's compromised, he's owned. How do you think he got the job?

The owners will never allow someone that is against their interests into office. If one does somehow manage get in they'll kill him either literally or figuratively through character assassination.

Why anyone thinks that elections matter is beyond me. It's corporate candidate a or corporate candidate b, with very little exception.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
5. “If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal.” ~ Emma Goldman
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:14 PM
Apr 2013

Yeah, MrSlayer, this is a systemic problem.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
8. “Social Security represents America at its best, and now it is up to you to defend it,"
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:21 PM
Apr 2013

“Social Security is not driving the deficit; therefore it should not be part of reforms aimed at cutting the deficit. The chained CPI, deceptively portrayed as a reasonable cost of living adjustment, is a cut to Social Security that would hurt seniors,” Mr. Reich says.

“There are several sensible reforms to Social Security that should be considered to help make it sustainable, including lifting the ceiling on income subject to Social Security from $113,700 to $200,000 or more, as well as instituting a 1 percent raise in the payroll tax rate, a rate that hasn't changed in over 20 years,” Reich adds.

Jim Dean, chairman of Democracy for America – and brother of former Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean – called the news that Obama’s budget would include cuts to Social Security “a shot across the bow for the progressives who called their neighbors, spent weekends knocking doors, and donated millions to reelect him.”

An e-mail from Mr. Dean links to a petition aimed at Congress."


RECOMMENDED: How much do you know about US entitlement programs? Take our quiz.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2013/0405/Liberals-to-Obama-not-so-fast-on-Social-Security-cuts

 

lib2DaBone

(8,124 posts)
14. What is wrong with this president...?
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:18 PM
Apr 2013

.. The problem is......that he works for the very same Wall Street Banksters as the Repukes.

Both parties answer to the same master.

They want you to believe that there is a difference... because it buys the Banksters more time to cover their tracks.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
26. Our President has described himself as Reagan Democrat and Reagan believed people needed
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 08:47 AM
Apr 2013

to pull themselves up by their own boot stapes.. I don't know of a Republican that would align themselves with a Dem...

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
10. Obama: "I agree with Romney. I agree with Romney. I agree with Romney. I agree with Romney."
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:25 PM
Apr 2013

Remember that "debate"?

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
12. Because it's a nice big tempting pot of money that already rich people want to get their hands on.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:31 PM
Apr 2013

That's why.

savannah43

(575 posts)
15. They already took between $1.7 and $2.7trillion. They do not want to pay it back.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:19 PM
Apr 2013

And that's just the beginning of their plan to turn SS into a private profit making investment for themselves. They are counting on real people getting over anything given a bit of time.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
17. it's our money he wants to give away
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 11:04 PM
Apr 2013

If I had a savings account I wouldn't pull something like in Cyprus. But Obama wants to do it anyway.. X_X hopefully it's just a bluff. I don't believe North Korea is bluffing however.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
20. There's no question in my mind that it IS a bluff, TBH.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 11:29 PM
Apr 2013

The problem is, will it work? Or has the GOP managed to spring a trap for PBO to fall in?

rainy

(6,088 posts)
21. This is what I think too
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 11:52 PM
Apr 2013

Republicans have already said they will not ever raise one more penny in taxes. Obama has always asked foe concessions from both sides and his side has always been to include revenue . He knows they can't do that because their teabilly base will stay home if they give in to new taxes.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
18. Reduce SS benefits,
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 11:18 PM
Apr 2013

but not FICA taxes. Do it as the baby boomers retire. Follow the money if you can. Watch it change hands.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
22. I really don't know WHAT the President is doing...
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 11:55 PM
Apr 2013

...some say he's playing chess; some say he's a DINO, or worse he's a Republican; some say he's practicing bipartisanship ; some say he's kicking us in the gut like he did back in 2009. Maybe he was testing to see if anyone was listening, if anyone was awake.

He once said "TV loves a ruckus." But now it looks like he's the one that loves a ruckus.

cstanleytech

(26,224 posts)
23. Of course it doesnt contribute to the deficit FA but
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 11:55 PM
Apr 2013

by making the overture to the republicans it paints them into another corner because when they reject it (as I suspect they will) Obama can honestly say he tried to reach a compromise but the republicans were the ones unwilling to deal.

zeeland

(247 posts)
24. Bernie Sanders is making outstanding
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 11:56 PM
Apr 2013

points on Real Time with Bill Maher.Try and catch the video when it becomes available.

Heywood J

(2,515 posts)
27. Hmm...
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 02:10 PM
Apr 2013
[font size=+1]Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history.[/font]
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Goddamnit! Social Securi...