Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChained CPI was just a bluff, right? A negotiating tactic, right? So was the Sequester.
Howzzat workin' for ya?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1288 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chained CPI was just a bluff, right? A negotiating tactic, right? So was the Sequester. (Original Post)
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2013
OP
Yes, they aren't tied to principles the base believes in, it's about political pragmatism
HereSince1628
Apr 2013
#7
many on here wanted the sequester. Not me. My kids' school district is losing $350,000 next year.
liberal_at_heart
Apr 2013
#2
I always thought Obama really wanted the sequester - just as I've always thought he
forestpath
Apr 2013
#4
What was the alternative to the sequester? Has the CCPI actually come to pass yet?
KittyWampus
Apr 2013
#11
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)1. It doesn't make sense as a bluff for 2 reasons...
1) Everyone already knows the republicans are the party of NO.
There was nothing to be gained by underlining that.
2) The cost of alienating the democratic voting base turns out to be huge.
At least several orders greater than the benefit of gettting the r's to say NO!, again
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)6. it's the third way
piss off the "irrelevant" base and co-opt draconian rethuglican policies.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)7. Yes, they aren't tied to principles the base believes in, it's about political pragmatism
Enrique
(27,461 posts)9. maybe he thinks the democratic base can't be alienated
that seems to be his working assumption
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)10. I think he believes what Rahm said...the base has no where else to go
And being taken for granted in that way certainly isn't endearing
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)2. many on here wanted the sequester. Not me. My kids' school district is losing $350,000 next year.
Economic justice is no longer a democratic value. Apparently we're only allowed to care about social justice.
MOMFUDSKI
(5,432 posts)3. !
You GO, Stinky. I'm right with ya.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)4. I always thought Obama really wanted the sequester - just as I've always thought he
really wanted to cut SS/Medicare.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)5. Not worth a damn.
The U.S C-CPI-U, or more commonly known, the Chained United States Consumer Price Index is a time series measure of price levels of consumer goods and services created by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as an alternative to the United States Consumer Price Index. This index is not currently employed by the United States in its programs, but is often discussed as a possible reform because many economists believe it better measures inflation and reduces the federal deficit through a combination of spending cuts and increased revenues. As such, because the Chained CPI is used to measure things such as Cost of Living Adjustments, overestimating inflation leads to a higher than actual living adjustment.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)8. K & R !!!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)11. What was the alternative to the sequester? Has the CCPI actually come to pass yet?