General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEconomy Added 88,000 Jobs In March, Unemployment Rate Drops To 7.6 Percent (updated)
Last edited Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:10 AM - Edit history (1)
By Travis Waldron
According to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 88,000 jobs were created last month, and the unemployment rate ticked down to 7.6 percent largely because the participation rate dropped. Analysts had expected 190,000 jobs.
The private sector added 95,000 jobs, while the public sector contracted again, losing another 7,000 jobs.
The February job numbers were revised from 236,000 to 268,000, while Januarys numbers were revised from 119,000 to 148,000.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/05/1826321/economy-added-88000-jobs-in-march-unemployment-rate-drops-to-76-percent/
Updated to add:
By Steve Benen
Expectations going into this morning pointed to job growth of about 190,000 jobs. The actual total wasn't close.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this morning that the U.S. economy created just 88,000 jobs in March, the worst in the last 10 months. As is usually the case, there was a gap between the two major sectors -- America's private sector added 95,000 jobs last month, the public sector lost 7,000 jobs, though most of those totals were driven by Post Office layoffs.
The news is awful, but there was a silver lining: totals from January were revised up to 148,000 jobs (from 119,000), while February was revised up to 268,000 (from +236,000). The additional 61,000 jobs helped push the unemployment rate to 7.6%, its lowest point since December 2008.
But these encouraging tidbits are cold comfort, and can't sugarcoat a deeply disappointing jobs report. The obvious question, of course, is whether (and to what extent) deep and arbitrary sequestration spending cuts caused this reversal of fortunes. At first blush, the circumstantial evidence certainly makes congressional Republicans look ridiculous -- the job market was improving, then the GOP refused to compromise and imposed massive reductions in public investment despite Congressional Budget Office warnings that it would hurt hiring, then the GOP celebrated, then the steady progress in the job market stopped.
That said, it's hard to say with certainty that the sequester caused job trouble in March. We can say with certainty, however, that with the job market running into trouble, the very last thing Americans need right now are more deep spending cuts.
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/04/05/17615523-job-totals-stumble-to-10-month-low
tridim
(45,358 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)"the unemployment rate ticked down to 7.6 percentlargely because the participation rate dropped."
maybe you don't know what that means, but i do.
pinqy
(596 posts)Population increased 167,000
Employment dropped 206,000
Unemployment dropped 290,000
Not in the Labor Force does not want a job increased 762,000
Not in the Labor Force wants a job now decreased 99,000
pinqy
(596 posts)And does not want a job now is also up from last year.
But more importantly, the Marginally Attached and Discouraged are down from last year and last month. (non-discouraged marginally attached went up)
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)spanone
(135,795 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)you're not going to run out & get a second job if you think you're going to be rehired in a couple of months.
a kennedy
(29,618 posts)Fridays Trading:
Dow-149.29
14,456.82 -1.02%
Nasdaq-51.87
3,173.11 -1.61%
S&P-19.86
1,540.12 -1.27%
"The percentage of Americans working or looking for jobs fell to 63.3 percent in March, the lowest such figure in nearly 34 years.
Stock futures sank after the jobs report was released at 8:30 a.m. Eastern timeThe percentage of Americans working or looking for jobs fell to 63.3 percent in March, the lowest such figure in nearly 34 years..."
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Oh. Here you are. I expected to see you in a different thread."
...looking for me? Why? Which thread?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Chained CPI? SS cuts? Grand Bargain?"
...does that mean? I asked why you were looking for me and for a link to a thread.
Two questions, neither one answered.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)But don't be obtuse.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Sorry I can't make links on this cell phone...But don't be obtuse."
...you were on your cell phone when you were "looking" for me? You have answered why you were looking for me, and now you're jumping to name calling?
Here, I'll help you out with some links:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022618445
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022618395
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2618177
Still, I'd like to know why you were "looking" for me.