Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 08:40 AM Apr 2013

Economy Added 88,000 Jobs In March, Unemployment Rate Drops To 7.6 Percent (updated)

Last edited Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:10 AM - Edit history (1)

Economy Added 88,000 Jobs In March, Unemployment Rate Drops To 7.6 Percent

By Travis Waldron

According to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 88,000 jobs were created last month, and the unemployment rate ticked down to 7.6 percent largely because the participation rate dropped. Analysts had expected 190,000 jobs.

The private sector added 95,000 jobs, while the public sector contracted again, losing another 7,000 jobs.

The February job numbers were revised from 236,000 to 268,000, while January’s numbers were revised from 119,000 to 148,000.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/05/1826321/economy-added-88000-jobs-in-march-unemployment-rate-drops-to-76-percent/


Updated to add:

Job totals stumble to 10-month low

By Steve Benen



Expectations going into this morning pointed to job growth of about 190,000 jobs. The actual total wasn't close.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this morning that the U.S. economy created just 88,000 jobs in March, the worst in the last 10 months. As is usually the case, there was a gap between the two major sectors -- America's private sector added 95,000 jobs last month, the public sector lost 7,000 jobs, though most of those totals were driven by Post Office layoffs.

The news is awful, but there was a silver lining: totals from January were revised up to 148,000 jobs (from 119,000), while February was revised up to 268,000 (from +236,000). The additional 61,000 jobs helped push the unemployment rate to 7.6%, its lowest point since December 2008.

But these encouraging tidbits are cold comfort, and can't sugarcoat a deeply disappointing jobs report. The obvious question, of course, is whether (and to what extent) deep and arbitrary sequestration spending cuts caused this reversal of fortunes. At first blush, the circumstantial evidence certainly makes congressional Republicans look ridiculous -- the job market was improving, then the GOP refused to compromise and imposed massive reductions in public investment despite Congressional Budget Office warnings that it would hurt hiring, then the GOP celebrated, then the steady progress in the job market stopped.

That said, it's hard to say with certainty that the sequester caused job trouble in March. We can say with certainty, however, that with the job market running into trouble, the very last thing Americans need right now are more deep spending cuts.

- more -

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/04/05/17615523-job-totals-stumble-to-10-month-low

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Economy Added 88,000 Jobs In March, Unemployment Rate Drops To 7.6 Percent (updated) (Original Post) ProSense Apr 2013 OP
Damn you Obama. nt tridim Apr 2013 #1
ooh, a whole 88K? my my at that rate we should be back to full employment by 2020. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #2
It means that fewer people want a job pinqy Apr 2013 #3
... HiPointDem Apr 2013 #4
Yes, but down from Feb 2013 pinqy Apr 2013 #5
marginally attached women down, men up, and all those are subsets of 'want a job'. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #8
sequester....lucky it's not 5 jobs added spanone Apr 2013 #6
sequester accounts more for those not in the labor force who *don't* want a job, because HiPointDem Apr 2013 #9
and oh yah, the DOW is tanking on this wonderful news. a kennedy Apr 2013 #7
But... egduj Apr 2013 #10
Oh. Here you are. I expected to see you in a different thread. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #11
You were ProSense Apr 2013 #12
Chained CPI? SS cuts? Grand Bargain? cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #13
What ProSense Apr 2013 #14
Sorry I can't make links on this cell phone. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #15
Wait ProSense Apr 2013 #16
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
2. ooh, a whole 88K? my my at that rate we should be back to full employment by 2020.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 08:59 AM
Apr 2013

"the unemployment rate ticked down to 7.6 percentlargely because the participation rate dropped."

maybe you don't know what that means, but i do.

pinqy

(596 posts)
3. It means that fewer people want a job
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:09 AM
Apr 2013

Population increased 167,000
Employment dropped 206,000
Unemployment dropped 290,000
Not in the Labor Force does not want a job increased 762,000
Not in the Labor Force wants a job now decreased 99,000

pinqy

(596 posts)
5. Yes, but down from Feb 2013
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:36 AM
Apr 2013

And does not want a job now is also up from last year.
But more importantly, the Marginally Attached and Discouraged are down from last year and last month. (non-discouraged marginally attached went up)

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
9. sequester accounts more for those not in the labor force who *don't* want a job, because
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:40 AM
Apr 2013

you're not going to run out & get a second job if you think you're going to be rehired in a couple of months.

a kennedy

(29,618 posts)
7. and oh yah, the DOW is tanking on this wonderful news.
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:38 AM
Apr 2013

Friday’s Trading:

Dow-149.29

14,456.82 -1.02%

Nasdaq-51.87

3,173.11 -1.61%

S&P-19.86

1,540.12 -1.27%

egduj

(805 posts)
10. But...
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:41 AM
Apr 2013

"The percentage of Americans working or looking for jobs fell to 63.3 percent in March, the lowest such figure in nearly 34 years.

Stock futures sank after the jobs report was released at 8:30 a.m. Eastern timeThe percentage of Americans working or looking for jobs fell to 63.3 percent in March, the lowest such figure in nearly 34 years..."

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. You were
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 09:56 AM
Apr 2013

"Oh. Here you are. I expected to see you in a different thread."

...looking for me? Why? Which thread?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
14. What
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:14 AM
Apr 2013

"Chained CPI? SS cuts? Grand Bargain?"

...does that mean? I asked why you were looking for me and for a link to a thread.

Two questions, neither one answered.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
16. Wait
Fri Apr 5, 2013, 10:43 AM
Apr 2013

"Sorry I can't make links on this cell phone...But don't be obtuse."

...you were on your cell phone when you were "looking" for me? You have answered why you were looking for me, and now you're jumping to name calling?

Here, I'll help you out with some links:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022618445
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022618395
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2618177

Still, I'd like to know why you were "looking" for me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Economy Added 88,000 Jobs...