General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPresident Obama will formally propose cuts to Social Security and Medicare
Obama Budget to Include Cuts to Programs in Hopes of Deal
By JACKIE CALMES
Published: April 5, 2013 127 Comments
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/us/social-programs-face-cutback-in-obama-budget.html?pagewanted=all
<<snip>>
In a significant shift in fiscal strategy, Mr. Obama on Wednesday will send a budget plan to Capitol Hill that departs from the usual presidential wish list that Republicans typically declare dead on arrival. Instead it will embody the final compromise offer that he made to Speaker John A. Boehner late last year, before Mr. Boehner abandoned negotiations in opposition to the presidents demand for higher taxes from wealthy individuals and some corporations.
Congressional Republicans have dug in against any new tax revenues after higher taxes for the affluent were approved at the start of the year. The administrations hope is to create cracks in Republicans antitax resistance, especially in the Senate, as constituents complain about the across-the-board cuts in military and domestic programs that took effect March 1.
Mr. Obamas proposed deficit reduction would replace those cuts. And if Republicans continue to resist the president, the White House believes that most Americans will blame them for the fiscal paralysis.
Besides the tax increases that most Republicans continue to oppose, Mr. Obamas budget will propose a new inflation formula that would have the effect of reducing cost-of-living payments for Social Security benefits, though with financial protections for low-income and very old beneficiaries, administration officials said. The idea, known as chained C.P.I., has infuriated some Democrats and advocacy groups to Mr. Obamas left, and they have already mobilized in opposition.
As Mr. Obama has before, his budget documents will emphasize that he would support the cost-of-living change, as well as other reductions that Republicans have called for in the popular programs for older Americans, only if Republicans agree to additional taxes on the wealthy and infrastructure investments that the president called for in last years offer to Mr. Boehner.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)on the issue of raising taxes and combined with dems who oppose this, will defeat it.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)The f**king repubs have been trying to get rid of SS for decades and if they get the chance to start that process now, they will take it.
cali
(114,904 posts)meetings with the President this year because it included raising taxes. The pukes are caught between their desire to cut Social Security and their pledges to not raise taxes no matter what. So yes, our only hope is precisely what I laid out.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)that they were easily ready. The media seems to be hinting that his rejection was thoughtful.
Our side just looks sad.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)piece at a time. This is the old 'foot in the door' sales tactic. Get a foot in the door, and keep driving the issue 'till all succumb.
There are just too many seniors becoming millionaires 'cause of SS benefits. Mark my word, with these tactics SS will be gone within a decade. IMO this proposal by Obama is piss-poor, and republicans will rejoice over yet another cave-in. Push long enough and the door breaks in ...
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)What a double-cross!
For others in the economy, there is a chance that with wise management, the outlook will improve and their incomes along with it. That is utterly not true for seniors who rely primarily on Social Security for their income.
20 years ago, a couple who had saved some money might not be relying so much on Social Security for their income. They might be getting some income from return on their savings or investment in addition to Social Security.
Now, banks pay no interest -- or virtually no interest -- so seniors who are no longer working are more dependent than ever on their Social Security benefit and nothing else.
People who worked hard all their lives live on less than $1500 per month even if they did save.
That is shameful.
And the other terrible fact about our economy is that our young workers are struggling with the debts they took on when they went to college.
Meanwhile, I have yet to see the names of the 4000 individuals with offshore accounts on the list that was recently discussed in the Guardian.
They should be royally fined or asked to change their citizenship and declared persona non grata in the US. That may be legally impossible, but it would be appropriate.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)RKP5637
(67,089 posts)oligarchs have won. I heard someplace recently that about 28% of American have less than $1,000 in cash ... and something like 47% of Americans have less than $25,000 in set aside funds. Don't quote me on these figures, I'm just recalling what I heard recently ... I think few Americans today realize when they hit retirement most will have nothing or very little. Safety nets are fading, SS is being dismantled and who knows where Medicare is headed ... if the R's are back in seniors well might be walking around with $6,000 vouchers while the insurance companies laugh at them. This country is headed straight toward being a theocratic dystopia IMO.
I hope I'm wrong, but my guess is in about 10 years or less this will seem like the best of times for many Americans, young and old.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Not much we can do actually. Massive civ il Dis obedience, might help slow the death process.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)continue to strip the bones of the middle class, and upper-middle class, I think massive civ il Dis obedience will eventually occur, when backs are to the wall, death is around the corner, and there is nothing to lose, and really nothing else left to try.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Scared to speak, they are.
Skittles
(153,122 posts)your figures are correct
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Democrats.
Now, the door is being held open, and by a Democrat! What a sad day this is especially for the most vulnerable Americans, the disabled, the elderly, the poor and dependent children, sold out by those they trusted to protect them.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)I wonder a lot about what party I do belong too ... In my lifetime it's drastically changed. $$$$$ is a top priority, but "we the people," not so much ... unless you can belly up to the bar with lots of $$$$$. Frankly, IMO, we're living through the end of a democracy experiment.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)"It will not stop here, R's will dismantle SS a piece at a time."
It isn't the "R's" proposing this"chained CPI" for SS. It is "our" democratic, corporate owned (just like any person who is now allowed to run for president by TPTB) "D" president...
Of course Obama has said that if we don't like the way he does things, we need to "make him" change.
Unless we actually take to the streets by the millions, not a damned thing will change. Unfortunately, by the time the ignorant, lazy, self-satisfied, Amerikan people realize that their head is on the chopping block too, it will be way too late, if it is not already. Why don't we try and see?
This will give the masters a perfect reason to install an "R" as president next term.
It makes me glad that I am dying, I'm fed up with watching this country become the fascist regime that it has become. I hope that my children will heed my advice and raise their children in a society who is afraid of their citizenry. Hell, we out-number them by about 300 million to a few thousand, here. Yet we are too ignorant to act.
Did you see where a McDonald's employment ad required a bachelor's degree to apply for a cashier position? Soon that will be the rule, not an exception. We have nearly destroyed our Unions, who in the hell is going to stand-up for average Americans if we don't?
America has become the world's asshole. The rest of the world knows it.
BERNIE SANDERS FOR PRESIDENT. DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM, NOT UNFETTERED CAPITALISM.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)Bernie Sanders for president. On the current course we are headed straight for a theoretic dystopia for most of America. What I meant in my post was pretty much what you are saying ... these actions will enable the republicans to fully destroy SS. You said it far better than I. All that Obama is doing with this will be used against him. He will go down in history as the president that started the destruction of SS.
Earlier today I was telling someone at home I'm starting not to give a fuck anymore. The majority of Americans, at least a close 50/50, don't give a fuck about many things. Most people I talk to always have a 'deer in the headlight look.' I think the typical American doesn't have the foggiest idea what is going on in this country. They think 'cause they vote democratic that fixes everything, well, it doesn't!
whathehell
(29,037 posts)This version will be "It took Obama to cut Social Security and Medicare"
The Pukes have been waiting for this for a long time.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)part of the plan ...
whathehell
(29,037 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Honestly folks, how can you have missed the four years of Obama trying to do a deal with Republicans to cut the Safety Net? He has alluded to his attempts -plural attempts, not singular- to get a deal cutting Social benefits in exchange for tax increases on numerous occasions. He even pushed for this during the depths of the Great Financial Crisis.
People just didn't want to believe the news? Fingers stuck in ears? Heads up rears?
The Republicans haven't wanted an agreement with him on anything, not unless it comes in the form of them laying down an ultimatum and him conceding to it in a public show of humiliation and abasement. (The content of ANY legislation for Republicans is a distant second in importance to the capitulating FORM which the agreement takes - because their base is so ignorant and enraged.) Republican intransigence is the ONLY REASON why you haven't seen a deal cutting the safety net already. Don't count on your Democrats blocking anything. Only a minority of the PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS would sign a letter rejecting cuts to the safety net. Oh yeah, you're all fucked cross-eyed and speechless, if rescue depends on the Democrats.
Go ahead and call your Democratic Representatives and Senators. But don't forget to pray to God(s) the Republicans stay savage and intransigent. The latter course is your best hope.
airplaneman
(1,239 posts)Take everything they want.
Give nothing they don't.
-Airplane
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)Is it also time to redefine "compromise"?
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)on point
(2,506 posts)RKP5637
(67,089 posts)Response to dajoki (Original post)
Post removed
forestpath
(3,102 posts)It feels like the Democrats didn't win all over again.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)was the last time Obama kicked us in the teeth, and the time before that....
I'm done...
AzDar
(14,023 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)you need to give the one party two names and two articles of incorporation.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Beartracks
(12,801 posts)The Link
(757 posts)He thinks we should all give the President credit for proposing a real budget.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)if Morning Joe backs it.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)This isn't just a Democrate issue it's an AMERICAN !!!!! Issue WTF
zeemike
(18,998 posts)We have them on Saturday when all the PTB are in the Hampton's or out for the weekend and go home on Sunday...Monday it is Business ans usual in DC.
Nope, if you want it to work you have to go there to stay until there is change...and most people are afraid of loosing their jobs by doing something like that.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)Powers That Be.
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)did I miss something in last year's election results?
lets see . . . how much will I be contributing to D campaigns this year
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)House. If we can get these assjacks out of office and put it back into Democratic hands we wouldn't have any of these problems.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)spineless . . .
demwing
(16,916 posts)But if this article is true, the budget is coming directly from the White House. How the hell can that be blamed on the Republicans?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)can keep sticking up that fake rabbit, but people aren't going to keep chasing it.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)It was a lot and most of it would not pass today.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)here.
none of it was very important, is my memory. not in comparison with what could have been done given the political capital and solid majority obama had right after the election.
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)Washington Monthly of his accomplishments from that time. It is actually a list of his 50 greatest accomplishments but I went through and picked out the ones from 2009-2010 to show how he needed the Democratic House to achieve a lot of them.
Signed $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009 to spur economic growth amid greatest recession since the Great Depression.
Signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) to re-regulate the financial sector after its practices caused the Great Recession.
In 2009, injected $62 billion in federal money (on top of $13.4 billion in loans from the Bush administration) into ailing GM and Chrysler in return for equity stakes and agreements for massive restructuring.
Reversed Bush Torture Policies: Two days after taking office, nullified Bush-era rulings that had allowed detainees in U.S. custody to undergo certain enhanced interrogation techniques considered inhumane under the Geneva Conventions - (although that I do not think involved congress)
Boosted Fuel Efficiency Standards: Released new fuel efficiency standards in 2011 that will nearly double the fuel economy for cars and trucks by 2025.
Created Conditions to Begin Closing Dirtiest Power Plants: New EPA restrictions on mercury and toxic pollution, issued in December 2011, likely to lead to the closing of between sixty-eight and 231 of the nations oldest and dirtiest coal-fired power plants. Estimated cost to utilities: at least $11 billion by 2016. Estimated health benefits: $59 billion to $140 billion. Will also significantly reduce carbon emissions and, with other regulations, comprises whats been called Obamas stealth climate policy.----------------I know this is 2011 but it seems important.
Passed Credit Card Reforms: Signed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act (2009), which prohibits credit card companies from raising rates without advance notification, mandates a grace period on interest rate increases, and strictly limits overdraft and other fees.
Signed Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in 2009, giving women who are paid less than men for the same work the right to sue their employers after they find out about the discrimination, even if that discrimination happened years ago.-----------Look what it took just to get the violence against women act passed. It failed first because of the rethugs.
Expanded National Service: Signed Serve America Act in 2009, which authorized a tripling of the size of AmeriCorps. Program grew 13 percent to 85,000 members across the country by 2012, when new House GOP majority refused to appropriate more funds for further expansion.
Expanded Wilderness and Watershed Protection: Signed Omnibus Public Lands Management Act (2009), which designated more than 2 million acres as wilderness, created thousands of miles of recreational and historic trails, and protected more than 1,000 miles of rivers.
Gave the FDA Power to Regulate Tobacco: Signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (2009). Nine years in the making and long resisted by the tobacco industry, the law mandates that tobacco manufacturers disclose all ingredients, obtain FDA approval for new tobacco products, and expand the size and prominence of cigarette warning labels, and bans the sale of misleadingly labeled light cigarette brands and tobacco sponsorship of entertainment events.
Pushed Federal Agencies to Be Green Leaders: Issued executive order in 2009 requiring all federal agencies to make plans to soften their environmental impacts by 2020. Goals include 30 percent reduction in fleet gasoline use, 26 percent boost in water efficiency, and sustainability requirements for 95 percent of all federal contracts. Because federal government is the countrys single biggest purchaser of goods and services, likely to have ripple effects throughout the economy for years to come.
Invested Heavily in Renewable Technology: As part of the 2009 stimulus, invested $90 billion, more than any previous administration, in research on smart grids, energy efficiency, electric cars, renewable electricity generation, cleaner coal, and biofuels.
Crafting Next-Generation School Tests: Devoted $330 million in stimulus money to pay two consortia of states and universities to create competing versions of new K-12 student performance tests based on latest psychometric research. New tests could transform the learning environment in vast majority of public school classrooms beginning in 2014.
Expanded Hate Crimes Protections: Signed Hate Crimes Prevention Act (2009), which expands existing hate crime protections to include crimes based on a victims sexual orientation, gender, or disability, in addition to race, color, religion, or national origin.
Expanded Health Coverage for Children: Signed 2009 Childrens Health Insurance Authorization Act, which allows the Childrens Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to cover health care for 4 million more children, paid for by a tax increase on tobacco products.-------------REMEMBER HOW BUSH VETOED THIS?
Recognized the Dangers of Carbon Dioxide: In 2009, EPA declared carbon dioxide a pollutant, allowing the agency to regulate its production.
Expanded Stem Cell Research: In 2009, eliminated the Bush-era restrictions on embryonic stem cell research, which shows promise in treating spinal injuries, among many other areas.-------Another thing Bush refused to allow!
Provided Payment to Wronged Minority Farmers: In 2009, signed Claims Resolution Act, which provided $4.6 billion in funding for a legal settlement with black and Native American farmers who the government cheated out of loans and natural resource royalties in years past.-------------I'd like to see this congress pass such a thing now.
Killed the F-22: In 2009, ended further purchases of Lockheed Martin single-seat, twin-engine, fighter aircraft, which cost $358 million apiece. Though the military had 187 built, the plane has never flown a single combat mission. Eliminating it saved $4 billion.
More: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/march_april_2012/features/obamas_top_50_accomplishments035755.php?page=1
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Do they do sleepovers and pajama parties with him too?
If they even propose cutting social security and Medicare we lose the Senate, simple as that. I got disappointed right off the bat when we elected OUR senators and then no filibuster reform. And soon as Mr Grande Bargain Legacy started talking cutting benefits, as well a Pelosi, Hoyer and others, I haven't sent a dime. I am saving it up to cover the cuts and political donations are the easiest thing to save.
I really don't know what he is thinking and he has lost my confidence. Even if taxes are raised, half the millionaires vote democrat. Koch is not going to suddenly back democrats. But if he even proposed the cuts, repugs will run saying I will protect you and there will be democratic voters that switch. It is not brave it is stupid to propose cutting something that polls show 80% of the people are opposed to.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)my point was that we won the election - yet we are giving in on key issues
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)samplegirl
(11,465 posts)I have just about had it being held hostage!
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)It will be a disaster and the Democrats will be blamed -- as they should be.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)He wants a "legacy" so bad, he's sacrificing the Democratic party to get one.
There's no reason to vote for Democrats when they vote like Republicans. Why bother?
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)go back to some major university and teach law once a week .. write some books, give some speeches at $100,000 or more a pop .. and he'll go down in history as a hero. They always do. Yet, the people who were depending on that ''hope and change'' were short changed. What a naive, narcissistic person. Thanks Obama for growing a pair ... NOT!
daa
(2,621 posts)Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)Just what we need - more pessimism.
Obama could be playing the same game he played before Jan 1 when the repubs denied everything and when it came down to the wire he said to Boner, "YOU GET NOTHING"
forestpath
(3,102 posts)And if Obama is playing a "game," it's a very cruel and risky one.
Maraya1969
(22,464 posts)And I was one of the ones writing to him telling him he was crazy and what was the thinking etc? But after I saw how it all played out I realized he knew exactly what he was doing.
One thing I have learned about our President. He is several steps ahead of the rethugs and even us most of the time.
Skittles
(153,122 posts)do you even SEE what is happening?
Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)He really still thinks the GOP wants to govern, and he's willing to sacrifice the programs those of us who supported him through thick and thin depend on.
This stinks.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)and down about how great Obama is ... IMO this is the end of SS.
The next move will be to privatize SS and give it to the hucksters on wall street. They will then flush it down the toilet as they screw everyone for more wealth.
We are most all truly fucked in this country that waves the flag all of the time about how great it is ... piece by piece the country for "we the people" is being destroyed and replace with " we the oligarchs."
It's the boiling frog syndrome over and over again. And the 'deer in the headlight' people will say WTF, how did this happen.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)everyone.
call your legislators and the white house.
daa
(2,621 posts)privatizing social security first thing in his second term, spending some political capital, and immediately became an irrelevant lame duck.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Response to HiPointDem (Reply #21)
LondonReign2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
progressoid
(49,952 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)and would have therefore done a lot more of what the Rs want done - everything would be farther to the right than it is now.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)The administration knows this.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)just chill the fuck out 'cause he's got this? I feel better already.
tridim
(45,358 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight..
whathehell
(29,037 posts)Does anyone still believe this man is a democrat?
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)We must ask, call and beg Republicans to look out for us instead?
We must HOPE the Republicans come through and protect us from his really bad CHANGES.
Does he just like to scare the shit out of seniors and giggle while the Republicans get to play the heroes that protect them from catfood cuts Obama?
That is a really shitty strategy as there is no positive result possible,
In one scenario Republicans save SS and we get destroyed in the mid terms for offering it up like cold sushi on a platter
In the other the Republicans take him up on it and we get destroyed in the midterms for asking for catfood cuts that everyone but the wealthy elite hate the very idea of.
Is he taking a dive here to improve the Republicans image? Or is he just trying to screw seniors, veterans, and the Democratic party for a cushy job at one of Pete Peterson's many front operations?
Horrible chess player, and a bit dim since he doesn't understand SS is not part of the budget they are cutting.
tridim
(45,358 posts)The majority of the people want compromise, and that's exactly what Obama is doing in this impossible situation.
The Republicans will not compromise, SS anMedicarere will not be cut, and they will pay for it dearly with massive losses in 2014. Obama knows this. You should to.
Chef Eric
(1,024 posts)We all know this.
You should too. That's too with two o's.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)to actually have a Democratic president offer up these cuts is unthinkable. But it appears that is exactly what is happening.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Now with more bull.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)If SS medicare are not cut as you say, people will blame him for trying as hard as he could to lobby for entitlement cuts and praise Republicans for stopping him.
When the majority of the people want compromise, it is not a compromise of principle they want nor a commitment to gamble with their trust fund.
He is also continuing the Republican lie that SS cuts will trim a budget it has nothing to do with.
If you support these offers , this gambling with grandma's retirement check then you have to honestly consider if you belong with the Republican party.
Dryvinwhileblind
(153 posts)...what other realistic choices did We have? We finally elect our Man in 2000?, rigged, and stolen. Then again in '04?, rigged, and stolen. Now We'll see who's who in congress, and perhaps We'll see a filibuster that actually matters, for once. One party, two divisions, playing Us for fools, and tools. Again. FKM.
Just Us.
whathehell
(29,037 posts)like Hillary, for instance.
What can we do?....The only thing I can think of is to try like hell to get
a progressive, like Elizabeth Warren and/or Sherrod Brown, 'cause this DINO shit
is really starting to smell.
totodeinhere
(13,057 posts)when I voted for him in 2008. What is going to stop someone else from fooling us again?
whathehell
(29,037 posts)He has a "D" after his name, but I never thought of him as anything beyond a conservative
to moderate democrat.
What gave you the idea that he was "progresive"?
Snarkoleptic
(5,997 posts)Grover Norquist succeeds in bid to get a Democratic President to shoot Santa Claus.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)With malice and forethought. Just need a plausible cover.
liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)First they kick you out of your job when you reach middle age, all the while telling you that you will have to work longer because you can expect to live longer than your parents.
Then they raise the SS eligibility age so now you have to work longer at a lower wage job than you started your career at before you can draw social security.
NOW! - NOW, they want to just make that worthless.
Response to liberal N proud (Reply #30)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)The SS Trust Fund is the most fiscally responsible federal program in history,.. the ONLY program to not only totally fund itself, but to accumulate a $2.3 trillion surplus, loaned to the Treasury, secured by bonds, financing the deficit created by the passage of unprecedented low income tax rates for those at the very top, even during times of simultaneous wars.
This surplus is sufficient to finance the full payment of SS obligations through the mid 2030's with absolutely NO changes, by which time a significant proportion of the baby boom will no longer be drawing benefits.
Proposing the fraudulent "chained CPI" to further aggravate CPI calculations which were ALREADY RIGGED to underestimate true inflation is THEFT.
And the purpose of the theft is to turn payroll taxes into a permanent revenue stream for the general Treasury budget, so that income taxes can remain artificially at unsustainably low rates for the 1%.
byeya
(2,842 posts)to save Social Security "forever".
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)G_j
(40,366 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)flatly that there is no cuts to medicare in his budget. So which is it, is the President lying to me or is someone making up shit to throw at the President.
Tulsa World newspaper is my morning paper if you want to confirm what I'm saying.
WWW.tulsaworld.com
DrDan
(20,411 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)I could have missed it so the next trip to the library I'll check it out to see if I had.
I wonder if we just don't have a lot of O bashing going on here, actually
tridim
(45,358 posts)All for something that hasn't happenened and will not happen under this Democratic administration.
madokie
(51,076 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)I don't hear those words. I see him or read that he throws shit out to make the republicons look like fools who are bent on not allowing him to get anything passed that even looks like he might be for it so the american people can see the fools for who they are. In his proposals I keep looking for all the shit I read online about how the president is folding yet again. Theres only so much he can do due to what I just said so in a lot of ways his hands are tied. Its like the American people, republicon voters actually, put the pukes in charge of the house just so they could make sure no more like him make it to the white house, His presidency has shown we're still very much a racist country and a lot of other things. I can imagine what they'll do to Hillary if she decides to run. But back to what the topic is. I think we should cut the guy some slack and get our asses in the streets. Anyone here knows where the problems lie. Its called racism, bigotry and republican party, the GOP the grand old party, yup that is where our energies should be directed. IMHO
the pukes have president O so toxic that even if he breaths and it sounds like the name of a bill coming up it won't get off the table. He knows that, I know that. The villain in all this is not President Obama but rather the rich and their lackies, many who happen to be our congress critters, mostly republicons along with some democrats too.
Another issue is campaign finance reform but I'll shut up for now.
eilen
(4,950 posts)throughout Obama's tenure but they are not labeled as such. Instead they are trumpeted as "cost-saving measures" or "cuts to providers." What do you think a cut to provider is? It is a medicare cut. It means that a provider is going to look at their statement and their letter from Medicare demanding paybacks and determine they will no longer take Medicare patients. It is kind of like my job that offers great benefits like paid vacation time but doesn't allow you to actually take the vacation because they have critical staffing needs.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)"will not happen under this Democratic administration." Do you have any proof besides your awesome future knowledge that will guarantee this?
One more thing, YOUR INSISTENCE ON CALLING OPPOSITION TO ENTITLEMENT CUTS ON A DEM BOARD BASHING means that your roots are showing, only Republicans hate the act of defending SS so much they'll feel compelled to accuse SS advocates of bashing.
That behaviour should get you hidden just for the hatred and name calling if defenders of SS, I won't alert tho, I want all to see you for the SS hater you are.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)"In Medicare, the savings would mostly come from payments to health care providers, including hospitals and pharmaceutical companies, but Mr. Obama also proposes that higher-income beneficiaries pay more for coverage"
DrDan
(20,411 posts)"In Medicare, the savings would mostly come from payments to health care providers, including hospitals and pharmaceutical companies, but Mr. Obama also proposes that higher-income beneficiaries pay more for coverage"
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Doesn't he know he won the election? So fucking stupid.
littlemissmartypants
(22,600 posts)RKP5637
(67,089 posts)mind with very little voice. Only $$$$$ counts in USA, INC. Without lots of $$$$$, you really aren't a player in USA, INC. It's not the country I grew up with ...
Millions of Americans ... MILLIONS of Americans are destitute in this country ... hardly ever, if ever, does one hear MSM talking about the daily plights of millions of Americans in USA, INC.
This is truly la la land America. There is a serious cancer brewing in this country and it is bandaged over while the cancer of dystopia grows and the oligarchy becomes more wealthy.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Someone explain this to me. It makes no sense. He's falling in to the same trap over and over again, making concessions like this. Does he really think that chained CPI is a good idea? And does he really think that the GOP is going to agree to higher taxes on the rich and stimulus spending in return?
No. They are going to take the chained CPI, and the higher taxes and stimulus are going to be "bargained" away.
I'm an Obama supporter. But this is very disappointing.
Russd
(2 posts)Knive in the back by Dems again(Clinton NAFTA)really getting tired of this BS. Been Dem for 30+ yrs. I don't know if I can do this anymore.i guess he's just another corp. whore!
tridim
(45,358 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Distract from Obama's bullsh/t RW framing and perpetual cowering to the insane GOP.
Response to dajoki (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cali
(114,904 posts)Response to cali (Reply #52)
Name removed Message auto-removed
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Skittles
(153,122 posts)John2
(2,730 posts)third party to save your life because it is an easy way to give the presidency to them. A better way is for a more liberal candidate to challenge the Democratic Establishment just like the Tea Partiers do to their candidate in the primaries. Hillary Clinton didn't beat Obama because he beat her over the head for being a Washington Politician and voting for the Iraq War. One thing Obama also had going for him was his race and Celebrities like Oprah Winfrey campaigning for him. By the way, where has she been lately? The wealthy seems to be all the same.
There are plenty of Progressives in Congress and one of them needs to challenge the President's favorite next election. They think it is about their money and it can buy votes. I think it is about ideas. They also think it was about Obama's charisma. I didn't vote for Obama because of his charisma. Any Democrat that goes along with a sell out needs to be primaried period within the Democratic party. Two can play their games. The middle is nothing but a big myth perpetuated by the corporate media and wealthy people, whom they really represent. That includes these Wars too. The whole enchilada benefits the wealthy.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Is that you actual intentions Mr. Tennessee ploughboy? We saw what that did to the country when it allowed Bush to steal the election. That said, I would rather see the SS parole tax present cut off raised to a higher level.
Left Turn Only
(74 posts)Instead of considering voting 3rd party, which is simply throwing your vote away, we Democrats have to start trying to get progressives running for the next set of primaries. Republicans have already figured out that working on a state level is the key to success on the national level. Also, if there is anyone out there with the Green Party, then we have to combine forces and bring the Greens in with us, so that we can overpower the Democratic party in the same way that the Tea Partiers did. But, in any event, we can't allow the Republicans to win by default; they ARE worse, and they are counting on Democratic defections now that they are loosing ground with the falling popularity of the religious right, women, and young people. As they say: don't cut off your nose to spite your face.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Enough about Rahmney....Hillary - 2016!!!
H. Clinton is not a progressive! Elizabeth Warren 2016
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)anymore. I need to evaluate why I send so many donations to the democratic party. I feel less and less representation. As I've often said, there is very little difference between R's and D's when it comes to big $$$$$. Obama IMO is often no exception. Compromise = cave-in.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)They are becoming identical
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)whathehell
(29,037 posts)when the DSCC and the DCCC come calling, I tell them exactly that.
RKP5637
(67,089 posts)whathehell
(29,037 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... I've been told dozens, if not hundreds of times that President Barack H Obama would NEVER do such a thing by all-knowing, all-seeing political PROs that were ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN it was only 11th dimensional chess strategy, far beyond the ability of us dumbass Liberals to understand and at the proper instant, the prize the Republicans have sought for decades would be snatched away, leaving them writhing on the ground, defeated, once and for all.
You mean to say we were lied to?
I am stunned. STUNNED I SAY!
Response to 99Forever (Reply #55)
Post removed
99Forever
(14,524 posts).. up until he does it.
Who the fuck do you think you are fooling?
(See I can do emoticons too. Isn't that special?)
tridim
(45,358 posts)and there wont be under this administration unless the Republicans do it.
.. you guarantee that if there are cuts proposed, Obama will veto them?
Yes or no.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... gonna answer the question? If there is a bill passed that cuts Medicare and/or Social Security, do you absolutely guarantee that Obama will veto it?
Yes or no?
Speak up.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)dajoki
(10,678 posts)there are enough of Democrats in Congress to stop this crap. The Republicans can't do it without the help of the Democrats and President Obama.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)He knows it is the President that is making the proposal for these cuts.
He states that the cuts the President is asking for in writing won't happen.
Finally the mind bogglingly absurd statement is made
if these cuts offered in Obama's budget do happen
it will be Republicans that do it, apparently with Obama merely acting as their stenographer to get it in the budget, he works part time as a typist for them I guess.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Untold millions of lives are going to be adversely affected by this crap, and these tools are playing word games with it. As if we are so damn stupid we won't notice.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)They really do think we're THAT stupid.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Just another corporate fascist. I worked to elect this guy? You bet.. twice.
Phone calls, donations, signs, house parties.. shit man,....
Boy am I stupid.
And the argument that.. 'the other guy would have been worse,' is no argument at all.
Or the repubs block everything--steaming meadow muffins...
Hey...Obama, stop sending your girls on vacation(like all those ugly repubs say) and help us human beings....
And stop laughing so much. There is NOTHING to laugh about.
And stand up for something.
Oh, thanks for taking the 5% cut, I'm sure THAT really hurt. Big f*****g deal...
Were finished. it's over. I'm 69. can't stop working....which is fine.. but...
I thought I would feel better after that. I don't. I have no say in anything.
Criticisms and consoling words, welcome.
tridim
(45,358 posts)He has NOT cut SS and medicare, but that's just a minor detail I guess.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)That's not what we elected 2x for.
840high
(17,196 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Let's just keep paddling.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Seems like by 2015 he will be proposing the abolition of all social programs, at this rate.
One can only hope the repubs don't take the bait, yet again. But someday they will.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)Seems appropriate this morning. (Hint - go directly to the 1:50 mark to cut to the chase)
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)that my policies are so mainstream that if I had set the same policies that I had back in the 1980s, I would be considered a moderate Republican." - President Barack Obama
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Remember that "debate"?
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Pelosi said so.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)kdmorris
(5,649 posts)I am so disappointed right now.
Chef Eric
(1,024 posts)I would have called you a lunatic.
I think this is a disgrace.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)I am completely ashamed that I voted for this spineless wonder.
840high
(17,196 posts)a most comfortable future. The hell with us.
MissNostalgia
(159 posts)thanks!
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Nobody here stayed home.
Nobody stayed here stayed home. We are betrayed once again by the DLC Democratic in Name Only. In 2008, I thought Hillary would have been a disaster, little did I know Obama = Hillary.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It is like cutting off their nose to spite their face! Let's just make things even worse! That'll make us feel better.
gordianot
(15,234 posts)Republicans are the enemy.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Give away the farm on the New Deal programs, with no concessions on the Republican side.
Brilliant stuff.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Makes "bi-partisaning" SO MUCH EASIER when it's all (R).
Trojan horse
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)taking money from real people. Why? Cowardice. Avarice. Ignorance. Greed.
Shame on anyone who calls themselves a Democrat that votes for this - let alone proposes it.
This will be Obama's legacy. This will be what he is known for.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)and NOT helping main street, corporate appointments of men who should be indicted, and 100 men starving themselves as I write this because they are cleared to go home after 11 years and no trial but he wont let them return to their country of origin.
I'm ready for social security now...and after losing almost everything because of the financial crisis and ill health, I care and I need it..but I care more about the mayhem and death and destruction we cause..the never ending war and terror. Thats where our social security money is going..the trillions that should be helping us instead of lining the pockets of the weapons manufacturers and never ending war machine. Nothing that Obama does surprises me...nothing. I sat here watching the Afghanistan surge speech in 2009...right here on DU with my jaw dropped to the floor..and I knew then for certain what he is. I underestimated however, his fascination and diabolical use of drones. I also thought that he would follow thru with at least one campaign promise of significance. I was wrong but at this point, not surprised.
RILib
(862 posts)Can we please have a Democratic President next time? Uncle Joe Biden, please run in 2016
John2
(2,730 posts)progressives in Congress that should throw their hats in the ring to shake up the establishment. Debate them in the primaries and don't just coronate them as the leader. Obama had no opposition and he said what he wanted to, just because of it. A woman, hispanic or any white person with the right idea can shake up the Democratic Party because of the diversity within it. It is exactly what Lincoln did. He was recruited by an anti-slavery movement. The Democratic Party needs a movement within their ranks from the Left side of the Party because I believe they are the majority within their Party. Supporting a third Party candidate is suicidal when there is no need. I can think of a number of candidates, left leaning organizations can put money behind, if they only recruit them to run. Take the actress that couldn't run in Tennessee or Kentucky for example. She might not have the right ideas suited for those areas but she would have more popularity in a national campaign than a Republican rightwing candidate. People need to use their heads more than reacting emotionally. These left leaning organizations need to recruit and run their own candidates instead of marching in lock step with the Party favorite.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)the repubs get done screwing with the Electoral Collage it won't matter much.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)what is he thinking?
on point
(2,506 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Many of us knew it all along, but of course were marginalized on sites like this for even hinting at it. If he had been a true Democrat, TPTB would have never allowed him to make it beyond the primaries back in 08. It's an illusion that voters choose the president. Wall Street chooses the acceptable candidates, and then the voters are allowed to choose between the allowable choices. If that were not a fact, we would have had a President Bernie Sanders, or the like, well before now.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Smoke and mirrors. Total sham and fabrication.
Now we know why they want their 30,000 Armed Drones patrolling US skies. To protect THEM from US.
9/11
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)with gun toting protestors, while Homeland Security felt it necessary to keep tabs on peaceful genuinely grassroots occupy protests. Kind of underlines where we are at in this country.
valerief
(53,235 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Neither the president nor senior aides privately hold much hope that Republican leaders Mr. Boehner and Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate Republican leader will compromise. So Mr. Obamas strategy of reaching out to other Senate Republicans reflects a calculation that enough of them might cut a budget deal with the Democratic Senate majority. If that happens, the reasoning goes, a Senate-passed compromise would put pressure on the House to go along.
So I think it's another way to weaken the Republicans.
I'm not definitively saying that's the case because on its face, it doesn't look good. But I'll keep my powder dry for now.
loudsue
(14,087 posts)WTF is he thinking? Does he already have a bunch of democratic senators that will vote against this? Enough to make it not pass? Is that his strategy? So that he can say to the republicans "see? I went the whole way with you?" I hope like hell he has some sort of strategy that I don't see right now.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts)He will also close Gitmo and stop torture. He'll bring the troops home from Afghanistan.
Obama is just playing 3-dimension chess.. we have to give him time.. he has only had 5 years so far...
AllyCat
(16,152 posts)to protect our most vulnerable. Disappointment does not express my feelings right now.
John2
(2,730 posts)needs to be increased, not cut. That is my message to President Obama. I actually think the warmongering needs to be cut. I'm definitely out of step with him. There is no other solution but to challenge him. The Left needs to recruit their own leader and challenge the group he caters to within the Party. It is a power struggle that needs to take place. I do not agree with the Foreign or Domestic Policies he seems to be advocating. That Policy advocates more protracted Wars and targets the weak on domestic Policies within this country. It is wrong headed period. He has nobody within his cabinet advocating that or representing the more liberal wing of the Party. His cabinet represents a bunch of neocons and advocates of Wall Street. They got elected on more Liberal Policies, only to move towards the Right after the Election. It shows a lack of respect for the actual voters that put them in office. The safety net is not the wasteful spending and is not the real problems in the economy or with the Debt. The real problem is Greed at the Top and protacted Wars, this country cannot sustain. We are making promises to Foreign countries, that we cannot sustain. They need to provide for their own economies, human rights and national security problems like it should be. Regardless of what their past history was. This is 2013, not 1945. We need to move off the past for our own good.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)RIP Democratic Party.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)And so do I.
Response to dajoki (Original post)
Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
JEB
(4,748 posts)left me today.
still_one
(92,062 posts)Of trying to bend over for the repukes, and what has he learned?
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Why doesn't he just tell Agent Orange "We do not negotiate with terrorists"?
Initech
(100,043 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)empty spot in my soul. As I have said before the CPI has never helped me because it is so little and is eaten up almost immediately by decreases in other programs such as food stamps but I do know that it is important to many.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I am beginning to think it is because he's got no courage in him.
I am genuinely mystified.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Impeachable.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)what the plan is, what's the end game.
This is no technocratic tweaking, this is the biggest, signature, program that our party has put in place and fostered.
President Obama's plans for it are rightfully to be held accountable by the guardians of the Democratic Party.
He risks a future ostracism if he would tear at our foundation.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)and if that doesn't work then let's ramp up this NK thing.
JCMach1
(27,553 posts)spanone
(135,795 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)for a right-wing politician.
glinda
(14,807 posts)Every year things go up for us and cuts will make it impossible to survive. Guess I could unplug the TV and burn candles.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)All the signs were there.
All the balloons were floated.
All the roadwork was done.
When real progressives sounded the alarm, they were scoffed at and called "disloyal".
If I had been one of the asshats that screamed about "anticipatory outrage" while posting emoticons of people rolling their eyes or rolling on the floor laughing, I would be fucking humiliated and wouldn't post in any of these threads out of shame...
Oh wait, someone IS missing....
tout_le_monde
(23 posts)They knew they'd have an easier time (less public outcry) dismantling Social Security with a Democrat at the helm. Obama is like Oswald was...just a patsy in the process.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Arcanetrance
(2,670 posts)First off does that really change the fact that this was offered up to begin with. Furthermore what happens if they decide to call his bluff and say fine we will take this in return for tax hikes. Cause looking at it from their point of view there's an election in 2014 and 2016 they can always win the rest of the Congress and the white house in those elections and legislate new tax cuts.
Skittles
(153,122 posts)they've got nothing left