Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 11:15 AM Apr 2013

DOJ may release Enron's Skilling 18 years early

Jeffrey K. Skilling, the former Enron chief executive serving a 24-year sentence for his role in the energy company’s collapse, could be released from prison early under a possible agreement with the government, according to a notice on the Justice Department’s Web site.

Since his 2006 conviction on charges of securities fraud, conspiracy and insider trading, Mr. Skilling has served jail time in federal prisons in Minnesota and now Colorado. He and his legal team have waged an aggressive appeal, repeatedly seeking to overturn his conviction on various grounds.

The notice, posted early Thursday, was made to notify victims of Mr. Skilling’s crimes — thousands of former Enron employees and shareholders — of any changes related to a defendant’s sentence.

“The Department of Justice is considering entering into a sentencing agreement with the defendant in this matter,” reads the notice, which was earlier reported on by CNBC. “Such a sentencing agreement could restrict the parties and the Court from recommending, arguing for, or imposing certain sentences or conditions of confinement.”

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/04/04/enrons-skilling-could-get-early-prison-release/


34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ may release Enron's Skilling 18 years early (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 OP
Thank God he still has enough money to buy himself some justice! joeybee12 Apr 2013 #1
Yeah the DOJ is on the ball with fat cats Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 #4
I *have* to believe something bigger is at play. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #21
Fuck that. hobbit709 Apr 2013 #2
That is one criminal that needs to remain in prison, for the rest of his sentence. Tender to the Bone Apr 2013 #3
Meanwhile, Ken Lay, complete with his new face and identity, lounges on a Caribbean beach Champion Jack Apr 2013 #5
I'm cool with that if.... sadbear Apr 2013 #6
He's just jealous of Kennyboy Lay. nt tridim Apr 2013 #7
shit like this makes me long for the days of john ashcroft.. frylock Apr 2013 #8
could somebody tell me what the hell this means: niyad Apr 2013 #9
any doubt who is running things? dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #11
Probably A Bipartisan Jesture To Salve The GOP And Its Business Allies. TheMastersNemesis Apr 2013 #10
Wasn't his sentence overturned? tammywammy Apr 2013 #12
No ... he's been turned down 3 times by the courts Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 #16
Thanks for the info tammywammy Apr 2013 #19
The 5th circuit did overrule his sentence geek tragedy Apr 2013 #26
Thanks...that's what I thought. tammywammy Apr 2013 #30
I'm shocked! PolitFreak Apr 2013 #13
Unbelievable! City Lights Apr 2013 #14
Wonder how Don Siegelman is doing? Octafish Apr 2013 #15
Yeah it sucks Ichingcarpenter Apr 2013 #18
The guy would still make a great President. Octafish Apr 2013 #20
Don't forget that he dared stand up to Exxon Mobil. OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #29
Now all we need is a pardon for Ken Lay so he can come back to the USofMoney. nm rhett o rick Apr 2013 #17
The DOJ has to respond to a court order for resentencing dragonlady Apr 2013 #22
The rampant inequality of our US plutarchy is disgusting. Zorra Apr 2013 #23
This is a procedural issue; DOJ MUST respond and MUST publish this Notice:. Melinda Apr 2013 #24
how many publican moles are hidden in the DOJ. pansypoo53219 Apr 2013 #25
Does this mean he has to pay restitution to the victims of his fraud? yellowcanine Apr 2013 #27
Sure. There's probably a pot smoker who needs the cell space. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #28
At this point in time there is no reason to think the DOJ Rex Apr 2013 #31
I used to think only republican DOJs sucked ass whatchamacallit Apr 2013 #32
fuck him. spanone Apr 2013 #33
nothing the DOJ shocks me anymore. They love bankers. liberal_at_heart Apr 2013 #34

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
21. I *have* to believe something bigger is at play.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:26 PM
Apr 2013

I don't mean nearious conspiracy-wise but a plea or something of value to the government. I want to give the benefit of the doubt to the DOJ, I really do.

 
3. That is one criminal that needs to remain in prison, for the rest of his sentence.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 11:20 AM
Apr 2013

He has damaged California for years.

And then when he's out, then throw him to the Q hole for the rest of his life for California crimes committed.

niyad

(113,278 posts)
9. could somebody tell me what the hell this means:
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 11:55 AM
Apr 2013

Last edited Thu Apr 4, 2013, 06:18 PM - Edit history (1)

“Such a sentencing agreement could restrict the parties and the Court from recommending, arguing for, or imposing certain sentences or conditions of confinement.”

sounds like doj would not be able to impose any sorts of conditions on his release? am I understanding this correctly? must be nice to have that kind of money and influence, as a major felon whose acts damaged and destroyed countless lives (not to mention the economies of several states)

looking at that picture of him again, reminded me that it was the kind of smug, arrogant face one just wants to. . . .

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
12. Wasn't his sentence overturned?
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:14 PM
Apr 2013

I wonder if this is a way to make sure that he does serve longer than just getting out tomorrow. I'm interested to see more information about such a deal.

Skilling's restitution of $54M has been held up during his appeals, so I also wonder if making such a deal will let that get on with.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
16. No ... he's been turned down 3 times by the courts
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:21 PM
Apr 2013

This is a DOJ negotiation





he Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the appeal of the case March 1, 2010.[3][4] On June 24, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated part of Skilling's conviction and transferred the case back to the lower court for further proceedings. During April, 2011 a three judge 5th Circuit Court panel ruled that the verdict would have been the same despite the legal issues being discussed, and Skilling's conviction was confirmed.[5] Skilling appealed this new decision to the Supreme Court,[6] but was denied


tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
19. Thanks for the info
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:24 PM
Apr 2013

I couldn't remember the details of his post-conviction appeals. I know Fastow has been released from prison, but he had a lighter sentence since he cut a deal to testify against Skilling & Lay.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
26. The 5th circuit did overrule his sentence
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 01:14 PM
Apr 2013

and said the judge misapplied the sentencing standards in making the sentence too harsh.

City Lights

(25,171 posts)
14. Unbelievable!
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:17 PM
Apr 2013

We need an "I'm so mad I'm spitting nails" smiley.

Another dose of justice for the rich.

Eric Holder sickens me.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
15. Wonder how Don Siegelman is doing?
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:19 PM
Apr 2013

All he did was be a Southern Democrat who could beat the BFEE and its Rove Machine.

 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
29. Don't forget that he dared stand up to Exxon Mobil.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 02:18 PM
Apr 2013

And that is unacceptable.

President Obama's Supreme Court pick, Elena Kagan, during her stint as Solicitor General, wrote a brief to the SCOTUS urging them to deny a hearing to Don Siegelman, while the DoJ suggested that Siegelman be given an additional 20 year sentence.

Siegelman Judge Asked To Recuse As Kagan, Rove Oppose Reviews
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-kreig/siegelman-judge-asked-to_b_534628.html

Both Leura and Bill Canary have issued statements denying wrongdoing. To defer to Alabama's two powerful Republican senators, the Obama administration has so far continued Canary in office after she served during the two Bush administrations as the president's top prosecutor in Alabama's middle district, covering the state capital region.

~snip~

A bipartisan group of 91 former state attorneys general from more than 40 states formed an unprecedented coalition to file a friend-of-the-court brief to the Supreme Court arguing it should hear Siegelman's case because his actions did not constitute a crime.

But Kagan, now widely reported as a leading candidate to ascend from her post as Justice Department solicitor general to become her friend Obama's nominee for a Supreme Court vacancy, urged the high court in November to deny Siegelman a hearing. Kagan used technical legal arguments devised with the assistance of DOJ's trial prosecutors.

~snip~

Kagan's stance already has created strong skeptics in progressive circles in Alabama, and is certain to irritate Siegelman supporters around the country if she is nominated to the Supreme Court. DOJ has requested that Fuller resentence Siegelman, now 64, to an additional 20 years in prison.


I guess that's why Don Siegelman didn't get a pardon.

(For those needing a refresher, Don Siegleman was a thorn in the side of Big Oil.)

ExxonMobil’s Alabama Paydirt
http://harpers.org/blog/2007/11/exxonmobils-alabama-paydirt/

The State of Alabama believes that it was victimized by ExxonMobil. According to the state’s complaint launched by the Administration of Governor Don Siegelman, ExxonMobil committed fraud and underpaid the state in a contract dispute over natural gas pumped from Mobile Bay. Alabama won that litigation, and a jury awarded the state a judgment against ExxonMobil of roughly $3.6 billion. Not chump change, even for ExxonMobil. And for Alabama, an immense sum of money (roughly a third of the state’s annual budget).

But ExxonMobil appealed, secured a stay, and ultimately took the matter to the Alabama Supreme Court. Thursday, the state’s High Court handed down its decision, by a vote of 8-1. The Court sided with ExxonMobil and against Alabama. The punitive damage award was rejected, and Alabama was left with a compensatory award of $51.9 million, a pittance.

~snip~

Nevertheless, there is something very foul and unseemly in the air surrounding this decision. It expunged the punitive award altogether. And the decision was 8-1. Every Republican justice sided with ExxonMobil and the court’s sole Democrat sided with the state. This serves to underscore and highlight what really looks like a partisan and political divide. That also is extremely telling.


Leura Canary, the US Attorney (and Good Bushie) that Obama kept on is the wife of Bill Canary:

William Canary is a campaign partner of Karl Rove’s and worked with Rove in Alabama Court politics starting with 1992; Toby Roth, the former chief of staff to Governor Bill Riley was a third member of their team. The Rove-Canary-Roth team scored a series of quite astonishing successes, and in the end it totally transformed the Alabama court landscape, starting with the state’s Supreme Court. I have no reason to link Rove, Canary and Roth to the specific litigation between ExxonMobil and the State of Alabama in particular. But in broader terms, the ExxonMobil decision should be counted the ultimate triumph of the Rove-Canary-Roth game plan. It got the oil and gas community exactly what it was aiming for from the beginning: the elimination of punitive damage awards in commercial cases.

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
22. The DOJ has to respond to a court order for resentencing
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:36 PM
Apr 2013

Skilling had appealed his conviction on a point of law and ultimately the federal court decided against him on that because there was still overwhelming evidence of his part in the fraud. However, his legal team has more challenges in the works. From the NYT article:

But the federal appeals court also reiterated an earlier ruling that Mr. Skilling still needed to have his sentence re-calculated because Judge Lake had erred in his handling of another issue in the case. That re-sentencing was put on hold while the broader appeal wended its way through the courts.

So the DOJ will have to respond by making another sentencing recommendation in this case. The final decision on the new sentence will be up to the trial judge.

Melinda

(5,465 posts)
24. This is a procedural issue; DOJ MUST respond and MUST publish this Notice:.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:44 PM
Apr 2013
http://www.justice.gov/criminal/vns/docs/2013/04/skilling-publication-notice-in-two-newspapers.pdf

Now if the DOJ actually DOES do what Skilling is asking, then that's a horse of another color.

Time will tell. Let's all hope that their will be enough public outcry that the SOB serves out his entire sentence. Oh, and the People of CA also want their money back.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
28. Sure. There's probably a pot smoker who needs the cell space.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 01:35 PM
Apr 2013

A cancer granny who has been given a 20 year mandatory minimum sentence for having a plant in her back yard.

CRIMINULZ!

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
31. At this point in time there is no reason to think the DOJ
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 02:43 PM
Apr 2013

cares about the rule of law. They protect the plutocracy and their assets. Nothing more.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DOJ may release Enron's S...