General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDOJ may release Enron's Skilling 18 years early
Jeffrey K. Skilling, the former Enron chief executive serving a 24-year sentence for his role in the energy companys collapse, could be released from prison early under a possible agreement with the government, according to a notice on the Justice Departments Web site.
Since his 2006 conviction on charges of securities fraud, conspiracy and insider trading, Mr. Skilling has served jail time in federal prisons in Minnesota and now Colorado. He and his legal team have waged an aggressive appeal, repeatedly seeking to overturn his conviction on various grounds.
The notice, posted early Thursday, was made to notify victims of Mr. Skillings crimes thousands of former Enron employees and shareholders of any changes related to a defendants sentence.
The Department of Justice is considering entering into a sentencing agreement with the defendant in this matter, reads the notice, which was earlier reported on by CNBC. Such a sentencing agreement could restrict the parties and the Court from recommending, arguing for, or imposing certain sentences or conditions of confinement.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/04/04/enrons-skilling-could-get-early-prison-release/
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)and the fabulous boys of Enron
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)I don't mean nearious conspiracy-wise but a plea or something of value to the government. I want to give the benefit of the doubt to the DOJ, I really do.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Tender to the Bone
(93 posts)He has damaged California for years.
And then when he's out, then throw him to the Q hole for the rest of his life for California crimes committed.
Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)sadbear
(4,340 posts)they tattoo a big tilted "E" on his forehead.
tridim
(45,358 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)this is the worst DOJ ever.
niyad
(113,278 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 4, 2013, 06:18 PM - Edit history (1)
Such a sentencing agreement could restrict the parties and the Court from recommending, arguing for, or imposing certain sentences or conditions of confinement.
sounds like doj would not be able to impose any sorts of conditions on his release? am I understanding this correctly? must be nice to have that kind of money and influence, as a major felon whose acts damaged and destroyed countless lives (not to mention the economies of several states)
looking at that picture of him again, reminded me that it was the kind of smug, arrogant face one just wants to. . . .
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)They are not even bothering to hide it anymore.
TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I wonder if this is a way to make sure that he does serve longer than just getting out tomorrow. I'm interested to see more information about such a deal.
Skilling's restitution of $54M has been held up during his appeals, so I also wonder if making such a deal will let that get on with.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)This is a DOJ negotiation
he Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the appeal of the case March 1, 2010.[3][4] On June 24, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated part of Skilling's conviction and transferred the case back to the lower court for further proceedings. During April, 2011 a three judge 5th Circuit Court panel ruled that the verdict would have been the same despite the legal issues being discussed, and Skilling's conviction was confirmed.[5] Skilling appealed this new decision to the Supreme Court,[6] but was denied
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I couldn't remember the details of his post-conviction appeals. I know Fastow has been released from prison, but he had a lighter sentence since he cut a deal to testify against Skilling & Lay.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and said the judge misapplied the sentencing standards in making the sentence too harsh.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I couldn't remember the exact details.
PolitFreak
(236 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)We need an "I'm so mad I'm spitting nails" smiley.
Another dose of justice for the rich.
Eric Holder sickens me.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)All he did was be a Southern Democrat who could beat the BFEE and its Rove Machine.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)but he's not a millionaire fraudster and member of the 1%
Octafish
(55,745 posts)FWIK, he certainly would stand up to the Big Money boys.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)And that is unacceptable.
President Obama's Supreme Court pick, Elena Kagan, during her stint as Solicitor General, wrote a brief to the SCOTUS urging them to deny a hearing to Don Siegelman, while the DoJ suggested that Siegelman be given an additional 20 year sentence.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-kreig/siegelman-judge-asked-to_b_534628.html
Both Leura and Bill Canary have issued statements denying wrongdoing. To defer to Alabama's two powerful Republican senators, the Obama administration has so far continued Canary in office after she served during the two Bush administrations as the president's top prosecutor in Alabama's middle district, covering the state capital region.
~snip~
A bipartisan group of 91 former state attorneys general from more than 40 states formed an unprecedented coalition to file a friend-of-the-court brief to the Supreme Court arguing it should hear Siegelman's case because his actions did not constitute a crime.
But Kagan, now widely reported as a leading candidate to ascend from her post as Justice Department solicitor general to become her friend Obama's nominee for a Supreme Court vacancy, urged the high court in November to deny Siegelman a hearing. Kagan used technical legal arguments devised with the assistance of DOJ's trial prosecutors.
~snip~
Kagan's stance already has created strong skeptics in progressive circles in Alabama, and is certain to irritate Siegelman supporters around the country if she is nominated to the Supreme Court. DOJ has requested that Fuller resentence Siegelman, now 64, to an additional 20 years in prison.
I guess that's why Don Siegelman didn't get a pardon.
(For those needing a refresher, Don Siegleman was a thorn in the side of Big Oil.)
http://harpers.org/blog/2007/11/exxonmobils-alabama-paydirt/
The State of Alabama believes that it was victimized by ExxonMobil. According to the states complaint launched by the Administration of Governor Don Siegelman, ExxonMobil committed fraud and underpaid the state in a contract dispute over natural gas pumped from Mobile Bay. Alabama won that litigation, and a jury awarded the state a judgment against ExxonMobil of roughly $3.6 billion. Not chump change, even for ExxonMobil. And for Alabama, an immense sum of money (roughly a third of the states annual budget).
But ExxonMobil appealed, secured a stay, and ultimately took the matter to the Alabama Supreme Court. Thursday, the states High Court handed down its decision, by a vote of 8-1. The Court sided with ExxonMobil and against Alabama. The punitive damage award was rejected, and Alabama was left with a compensatory award of $51.9 million, a pittance.
~snip~
Nevertheless, there is something very foul and unseemly in the air surrounding this decision. It expunged the punitive award altogether. And the decision was 8-1. Every Republican justice sided with ExxonMobil and the courts sole Democrat sided with the state. This serves to underscore and highlight what really looks like a partisan and political divide. That also is extremely telling.
Leura Canary, the US Attorney (and Good Bushie) that Obama kept on is the wife of Bill Canary:
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)dragonlady
(3,577 posts)Skilling had appealed his conviction on a point of law and ultimately the federal court decided against him on that because there was still overwhelming evidence of his part in the fraud. However, his legal team has more challenges in the works. From the NYT article:
So the DOJ will have to respond by making another sentencing recommendation in this case. The final decision on the new sentence will be up to the trial judge.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Melinda
(5,465 posts)Now if the DOJ actually DOES do what Skilling is asking, then that's a horse of another color.
Time will tell. Let's all hope that their will be enough public outcry that the SOB serves out his entire sentence. Oh, and the People of CA also want their money back.
pansypoo53219
(20,974 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)If not, there should be no deal.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)A cancer granny who has been given a 20 year mandatory minimum sentence for having a plant in her back yard.
CRIMINULZ!
Rex
(65,616 posts)cares about the rule of law. They protect the plutocracy and their assets. Nothing more.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Silly me.
spanone
(135,829 posts)he stole MY money.