Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Autumn

(44,973 posts)
3. In his infinite wisdom, Skinner set in place trash thread and ignore.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 09:39 PM
Apr 2013

You don't have to read posts you don't like.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
5. Why not? It's a discussion forum.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 08:39 AM
Apr 2013

People should share what they want to share. Nobody's forced to click on anything here.

 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
6. They are entitled to their opinions on how we deal with the problem...
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 08:46 AM
Apr 2013

Not whatever paranoid fiction they make up about the problem in their minds... with absolutely no facts to back up their claims.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
7. Actually, there's nothing about DU that prevents
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 08:48 AM
Apr 2013

such posts. People speculate all the time here about all sorts of things. Why would the Korean situation be any different. If you believe someone is wrong, you can simply post a reply.

 

Comrade_McKenzie

(2,526 posts)
8. From the TOS:
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 08:52 AM
Apr 2013

"Don't go overboard with the crazy talk.

Democratic Underground is not intended to be a platform for kooks and crackpots peddling paranoid fantasies with little or no basis in fact. To accommodate our more imaginative members we tolerate some limited discussion of so-called "conspiracy theories" under the following circumstances: First, those discussions are not permitted in our heavily-trafficked Main forums; and second, those discussions cannot stray too far into Crazyland (eg: chemtrails, black helicopters, 9/11 death rays or holograms, the "New World Order," the Bilderbergers, the Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons, alien abduction, Bigfoot, and the like). In addition, please be aware that many conspiracy theories have roots in racism and anti-semitism, and Democratic Underground has zero tolerance for bigoted hate speech. In short, you take your chances."

I'd like to see kooks and crackpots claiming the administration is just making up shit about NK to go to war shown the door.

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
9. Try alerting, then, if you think someone is doing crazy talk.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 08:53 AM
Apr 2013

I think you'll find that very specific criteria apply. Look at the list of examples.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
10. Of course they are.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 08:59 AM
Apr 2013

Even lies, war mongering, and the beating of the war drum.

At the same time, those that would rather many thousands, possibly millions of innocent, noncombatants lives not be put at risk because the egotistical heads of states and their war machines can't act like decent civilized adults and stop rattling their sabers and dial the rhetoric and threats back, can call the warmongers out for their insanity.

That's called debate and it beats just letting the evil shit happen silently.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
12. Which doesn't mean opinions can't be stratified by measures of quality
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 09:06 AM
Apr 2013

variously expert opinion...
legal opinion
medical opinion
political/journalistic opinion
the opinion in Molly's Bar

or

well informed opinion
well reasoned opinion
empirically based opinion
uninformed opinion
off-the-wall opinion
biased opinion
propagandized opinion

etc.









MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
13. Of course not. Anyone can reply to any post they can see.
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 09:08 AM
Apr 2013

If a DUer disagrees with another DUer's position, the reply button is just below every post.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
14. I stated that with respect to skills important to reading and comprehension
Thu Apr 4, 2013, 09:26 AM
Apr 2013

A person wouldn't have to make a reply to have made an assessment of the quality of opinion they've encountered.

Indeed, opining an assessment of quality is usually in direct opposition to the purpose of employing the argument mitigating intention of the phrase "everyone is entitled to their opinion". Such reply may not be in the interest of peace.

Without, or prior to, posting a reply a critical thinker/reader would consider the quality of opinion within the conversation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People have different ide...