Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 06:07 PM Apr 2013

Hagel: US will be moving missile defense batteries to US bases in Guam

(an American territory southeast of Korea).
a signal that the Pentagon doesn't believe the threat of a possible North Korean attack is likely to fade quickly.
A senior administration official said the U.S. will deploy the system, known as a Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense battery, or THAAD, to Guam to protect against short- and medium-range missiles from North Korea.



Hagel:North Korea "poses a 'real, clear danger' to US Allies."

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-03/hagel-deploys-missile-defense-system-amid-real-clear-danger-north-korea


33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hagel: US will be moving missile defense batteries to US bases in Guam (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 OP
I'm glad they're taking such steps, but it's a little unnerving. TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #1
Steps that N.Korea can label as "provocation", I fear. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #3
Well, missile defense in Guam isn't provocation. Neither is responding to threats TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #4
Scholars on NK do not believe that the threats are credible. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #8
No, they're after something--easing of sanctions at the very least. They timed their nuke test TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #13
South Korea is perfectly capable of fending off anything NK dishes out. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #16
To a point. But our troops will be alongside them, and we have more stuff. TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #19
No. Just, no. South Korea has extreme deterrence capacity. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #21
SK has nuclear weaponry? News to me. TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #24
You really honestly believe nuclear weapons are needed to wage effective combat? Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #26
Deterrence against a nuclear power. SK isn't a nuclear power, but NK is. TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #29
Having enough fissile/fission material to make a bomb does not mean NK is a nuclear power. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #33
"Well, missile defense in Guam isn't provocation.".....to you and me. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #9
I believe reports that suggest he'd trying to strengthen his position and get TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #12
North Korea labels other countries' existence as a provocation. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2013 #27
They don't even need provocation. They attack without it. TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #30
South Korea, China and Japan should be taking care of this. Not us. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #2
We are obligated to help defend SK, we have troops there and in Okinawa and Guam. TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #5
If they attack, we can help defend. We should not be deploying weaponry preemptively. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #6
This is the biggest fish to fry right now. Defense against attack of our land, troops, or allies is TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #14
This is only the biggest fish if you want to beat the war drum. Is that what you're doing? Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #17
Uh...yeah, that's what I'm doing. I really enjoy the thought of my husband being called back TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #18
I just want to let you know that your rhetoric is indicative of a call to arms. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #20
Well, no, I support a de-escalation of tensions. I support NK realizing their bullshit TwilightGardener Apr 2013 #22
Moving missile sites closer to North Korea is an escalation. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #23
I'd like to see them put some additional resources into checking cargo containers, etc Marrah_G Apr 2013 #7
Things are accelerating it seems nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #10
From CNN regarding Kaesong nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #11
Trying to work us into another war, MadHound Apr 2013 #15
It's been talk of 'pivoting' to SE Asia for most of a year... HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #25
Post removed Post removed Apr 2013 #28
Which corporation makes those missles? I'm looking to invest in some stocks. L0oniX Apr 2013 #31
I think this is all my fault.In 1986 I went to the Middle East - all hell broke lose. I left there Douglas Carpenter Apr 2013 #32

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
4. Well, missile defense in Guam isn't provocation. Neither is responding to threats
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 06:46 PM
Apr 2013

with increased military activity--any rational country would move to protect itself and allies. If we ignored NK, and they didn't think anyone was taking them seriously, they might do something...to FORCE us to take them seriously. They seem especially unhinged right now.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
8. Scholars on NK do not believe that the threats are credible.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 06:52 PM
Apr 2013

This is domestic policy by the NK government to shore up internal support.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
13. No, they're after something--easing of sanctions at the very least. They timed their nuke test
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:37 PM
Apr 2013

in February right before the annual exercises, and are using the exercises to throw a shit fit--they want their cake (nukes) and to eat it, too (no sanctions, deals, $$$). Only problem is, if we're wrong and they really do mean to reunify the Koreas and kill Americans. Can't take any chances. Imagine if Obama did nothing all this time and a missile starts flying to Seoul or elsewhere.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
19. To a point. But our troops will be alongside them, and we have more stuff.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:57 PM
Apr 2013

They don't have nuclear weapons for deterrence the way Israel does--WE are the deterrence for them.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
21. No. Just, no. South Korea has extreme deterrence capacity.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 08:00 PM
Apr 2013

You don't seem to understand the facts or history of this situation.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
29. Deterrence against a nuclear power. SK isn't a nuclear power, but NK is.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 09:03 PM
Apr 2013

Not talking about conventional warfare--though there's a fear that NK could start something conventionally and then deploy something nuclear when we/SK retaliate, "in self defense".

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
33. Having enough fissile/fission material to make a bomb does not mean NK is a nuclear power.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 09:58 PM
Apr 2013

Or that it could use nuclear weapons in combat.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
9. "Well, missile defense in Guam isn't provocation.".....to you and me.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 06:55 PM
Apr 2013

But to the round guy in N. Korea, doing nothing or doing something seems to have the same effect.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
12. I believe reports that suggest he'd trying to strengthen his position and get
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:32 PM
Apr 2013

the military on his side--he's also got relatives kind of running the show. I think they've decided that conventional warfare is a no-go, but nukes are their ticket to glory. Not necessarily striking us, hopefully, but a great thing for leverage. I don't believe THEY believe we're going to attack them--people who feed you and make aid deals with you aren't going to suddenly turn around and kill you.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. We are obligated to help defend SK, we have troops there and in Okinawa and Guam.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 06:48 PM
Apr 2013

There is no way to stay out of it.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
6. If they attack, we can help defend. We should not be deploying weaponry preemptively.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 06:51 PM
Apr 2013

We have bigger fish to fry. And, needless to say, our allies are plenty prepared to fight off an NK attack without our help.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
14. This is the biggest fish to fry right now. Defense against attack of our land, troops, or allies is
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:42 PM
Apr 2013

100% our business and deserves our attention and a military response. NK doesn't bluff sometimes--they have attacked several times. But SK has changed the rules of engagement, and so anything that starts will snowball. Plus, the US was a little freaked out by their long range missile launch. They can hit at least some of our land.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
18. Uh...yeah, that's what I'm doing. I really enjoy the thought of my husband being called back
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:55 PM
Apr 2013

to active duty to serve in whatever fiasco ensues if some shit happens. He made it through the other two wars without incident, so maybe a third one is what we need.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
20. I just want to let you know that your rhetoric is indicative of a call to arms.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:59 PM
Apr 2013

You are supporting active escalation of tensions.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
22. Well, no, I support a de-escalation of tensions. I support NK realizing their bullshit
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 08:01 PM
Apr 2013

isn't working this time, and they'll be flattened if they try anything.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
23. Moving missile sites closer to North Korea is an escalation.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 08:04 PM
Apr 2013

This very closely follows the theories put forth in the Correlates of War.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
7. I'd like to see them put some additional resources into checking cargo containers, etc
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 06:52 PM
Apr 2013

Frankly, if they have nukes....I would worry about other means of delivery other then missiles....which they haven't had a ton of success with.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
11. From CNN regarding Kaesong
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:29 PM
Apr 2013

@KyungLahCNN: South Korean workers are waiting at the transit gate awaiting permission from the #DPRK to enter #Kaesong. It hasn't come yet. #cnn

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
15. Trying to work us into another war,
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 07:43 PM
Apr 2013

This is a foolish response on our part. Instead of trying to intimidate, we should ignore the idiots. N. Korea rattling its saber, as regular as the spring robin.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
25. It's been talk of 'pivoting' to SE Asia for most of a year...
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 08:24 PM
Apr 2013

Is Kim doing us a favor giving us cover to move assets to the western pacific??

Response to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
32. I think this is all my fault.In 1986 I went to the Middle East - all hell broke lose. I left there
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 09:10 PM
Apr 2013

in 2011 - and relatively speaking things have calmed down. In 2011 I came here to the Northern Mariana Islands - just a hundred miles or so north of Guam. Things were perfectly peaceful and tranquil and there wasn't the slightest hint of conflict in the area. Now this is happening. I guess I must be upsetting people somehow.

Actually, North Korea's threat is a threat to commit suicide and cause a lot of damage in the process. Nuclear capabilities aside - with close to two million troops and enormous amounts of artillery and short range missiles just north of Seoul - they could within minutes kill at least hundreds of thousands of South Koreans and level much of South Korea's energy, transport and industrial infrastructure. The collapse of the regime in the North would almost certainly mean millions of starving NK refugees trying to get into the South. This alone would completely wreck the economy of the South for a long time to come.

Their real missile capabilities in regards to Guam, Japan or certainly the U.S. mainland are pretty limited and uncertain. It would seem that all of this recent talk is crazy bravado. But knowing just how crazy their domestic propaganda is in North Korea - one can wonder if it is possible if the North Korean leader might actually believe their own propaganda? Expert opinion for the most part thinks this is bravado cooked up primarily for domestic consumption. But the language has gotten so extreme - we cannot help but wonder if North Korea has become something akin to the David Koresh Waco, Texas or Jim Jones, Jonestown cult - only one with 22 million followers - the fourth largest army in the world - hundreds of thousands of artillery pieces and short range missiles armed and pointed at the nearest city and nuclear weapons on top of all of that. Well if that is where they are coming from we are in trouble. But expert opinion for the most part does not think so - at least so far.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hagel: US will be moving...