General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRoger Ebert's cancer has returned. From his article about changes:
Typically, I write over 200 reviews a year for the Sun-Times that are carried by Universal Press Syndicate in some 200 newspapers. Last year, I wrote the most of my career, including 306 movie reviews, a blog post or two a week, and assorted other articles. I must slow down now, which is why I'm taking what I like to call "a leave of presence."
So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I'll see you at the movies.
More at
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2013/04/a_leave_of_presense.html
Makes me sad.
hlthe2b
(102,119 posts)to amaze me.
I wish only the best for this man, including as painless an end as possible when that time comes that recovery/survival becomes impossible.
Warpy
(111,141 posts)so I'm saddened but not surprised by this announcement.
I've never lived in Chicago, so my first exposure to Ebert was on Siskel & Ebert, probably the best reviewing team ever. If Siskel didn't like a movie, it had no brain. If Ebert didn't like one, it had no heart. If they both liked one, it was very likely a real winner of a film. "Two Thumbs Up!" really meant something.
He will be sorely missed as his presence slowly diminishes. I hope he has an easy passing with little pain, impossible but still to be hoped for.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)question everything
(47,434 posts)and his cancer was of the salivary gland.
Wishing you long and healthy life.
question everything
(47,434 posts)A courage to be admired.
SharonAnn
(13,771 posts)On MSNBC just now.