Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSeven States Working Hard To Shut Down Abortion Clinics
Last edited Wed Apr 3, 2013, 01:14 PM - Edit history (1)
Details about the efforts underway in Alabama, Indiana, North Dakota, Texas, Virginia, Mississippi, and North Carolina are described at the link.
Abortion opponents are chipping away at reproductive rights from all angles and one particularly insidious attack on womens health is currently advancing in states across the country. Under the guise of protecting womens safety, Republican lawmakers are successfully pushing unnecessary, complicated restrictions on abortion clinics that will ultimately force them to close their doors.
The Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers, or TRAP laws, tend to capture fewer headlines than other types of abortion restrictions, largely because theyre complicated pieces of legislation that may not seem outrageous on the surface. But womens health advocates warn they actually represent one of the most serious threats to reproductive rights in the nation. This is an effective anti-choice tactic because its an indirect method of restricting abortion access rather than banning the procedure itself, TRAP laws impose so much red tape on abortion providers that clinics are unable to continue providing reproductive care to the women who need it. Here are seven states that are threatening to undermine womens right to legal abortion services by shutting down abortion clinics:
...
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04/03/1815111/states-advancing-trap-laws/
The Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers, or TRAP laws, tend to capture fewer headlines than other types of abortion restrictions, largely because theyre complicated pieces of legislation that may not seem outrageous on the surface. But womens health advocates warn they actually represent one of the most serious threats to reproductive rights in the nation. This is an effective anti-choice tactic because its an indirect method of restricting abortion access rather than banning the procedure itself, TRAP laws impose so much red tape on abortion providers that clinics are unable to continue providing reproductive care to the women who need it. Here are seven states that are threatening to undermine womens right to legal abortion services by shutting down abortion clinics:
...
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/04/03/1815111/states-advancing-trap-laws/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 789 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Seven States Working Hard To Shut Down Abortion Clinics (Original Post)
redqueen
Apr 2013
OP
lastlib
(23,152 posts)1. This shit has got to end!
There has to be a way to fight it.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
redqueen
(115,103 posts)4. Women have to reach out to other women.
We have to persuade them to stop voting for people who pass these laws.
niyad
(113,055 posts)2. k and r--this information needs to be spread everywhere
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)3. k&r
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)5. One brewing in Alaska:
http://www.adn.com/2013/03/29/2845077/senate-finance-committee-takes.html
JUNEAU, Alaska The Senate Finance Committee started hearing a bill Friday that seeks to clarify when an abortion is "medically necessary."
SB49, by Sen. John Coghill, sets out parameters defining which abortions Alaska must pay for under the state Medicaid program.
The Alaska Supreme Court held that the state must fund medically necessary abortions if it pays for other procedures deemed medically necessary for people in need.
Payment wouldn't be made for "elective" abortions unless the woman was a victim of rape or incest.
Sen. Anna Fairclough, a Republican from Eagle River, noted that many women don't report rape for personal reasons. She said she doesn't want to subject women to public scrutiny as an unintended consequence of seeking an abortion.
JUNEAU, Alaska The Senate Finance Committee started hearing a bill Friday that seeks to clarify when an abortion is "medically necessary."
SB49, by Sen. John Coghill, sets out parameters defining which abortions Alaska must pay for under the state Medicaid program.
The Alaska Supreme Court held that the state must fund medically necessary abortions if it pays for other procedures deemed medically necessary for people in need.
Payment wouldn't be made for "elective" abortions unless the woman was a victim of rape or incest.
Sen. Anna Fairclough, a Republican from Eagle River, noted that many women don't report rape for personal reasons. She said she doesn't want to subject women to public scrutiny as an unintended consequence of seeking an abortion.