Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuotas get results
...
But earlier this month, after MSNBC announced it was giving Chris Hayes his own daily primetime news show, Media Matters published a chart that showed how his weekend show, Up with Chris Hayes, differed from its cable-news competitors: It wasnt all white dudes. Specifically, 57 percent of the shows guests were not white men. (Full disclosure: I have, in the past, been one of the non-dudes featured on said program.) To hear lots of journalists tell it, this is an impossible feat. So I called up Hayes to ask how he and his team created a shining oasis of diversity in a cable-news desert of sameness.
We just would look at the board and say, We already have too many white men. We cant have more. Really, that was it, Hayes says. Always, constantly just counting. Monitoring the diversity of the guests along gender lines, and along race and ethnicity lines. Out of four panelists on every show, he and his booking producers ensured that at least two were women. A general rule is if there are four people sitting at table, only two of them can be white men, he says. Often it would be less than that.
...
But sometimes national politics is the hottest topic, and some argue that media cant be held to a diversity standard when women and people of color are so drastically underrepresented in relevant spokesperson and leadership positions. Hayes acknowledges that, for shows like Meet the Press, theres probably something to that excuse. But most news outlets arent only talking to senators and CEOs. Theres a wide range of perspectives that can be brought to bear on any number of political issues. And, without a quota, its easy to default to the same handful of big names.
You have to say, We give ourselves this rule, and thats going to force us to just be more resourceful, Hayes says. Because I genuinely dont think theres another way to do it. If you dont do that then the inertia and the tide are so strong, unless you are committed as a priority to actively fight against it, youre going to end up reproducing what everyone else does.
...
http://www.cjr.org/realtalk/chris_hayes.php
But earlier this month, after MSNBC announced it was giving Chris Hayes his own daily primetime news show, Media Matters published a chart that showed how his weekend show, Up with Chris Hayes, differed from its cable-news competitors: It wasnt all white dudes. Specifically, 57 percent of the shows guests were not white men. (Full disclosure: I have, in the past, been one of the non-dudes featured on said program.) To hear lots of journalists tell it, this is an impossible feat. So I called up Hayes to ask how he and his team created a shining oasis of diversity in a cable-news desert of sameness.
We just would look at the board and say, We already have too many white men. We cant have more. Really, that was it, Hayes says. Always, constantly just counting. Monitoring the diversity of the guests along gender lines, and along race and ethnicity lines. Out of four panelists on every show, he and his booking producers ensured that at least two were women. A general rule is if there are four people sitting at table, only two of them can be white men, he says. Often it would be less than that.
...
But sometimes national politics is the hottest topic, and some argue that media cant be held to a diversity standard when women and people of color are so drastically underrepresented in relevant spokesperson and leadership positions. Hayes acknowledges that, for shows like Meet the Press, theres probably something to that excuse. But most news outlets arent only talking to senators and CEOs. Theres a wide range of perspectives that can be brought to bear on any number of political issues. And, without a quota, its easy to default to the same handful of big names.
You have to say, We give ourselves this rule, and thats going to force us to just be more resourceful, Hayes says. Because I genuinely dont think theres another way to do it. If you dont do that then the inertia and the tide are so strong, unless you are committed as a priority to actively fight against it, youre going to end up reproducing what everyone else does.
...
http://www.cjr.org/realtalk/chris_hayes.php
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 775 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quotas get results (Original Post)
redqueen
Apr 2013
OP
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)1. But think about all those poor white men who had to stand on the sidelines.
If only there were another news show where they could go and express their view points.
Or five other shows. Or ten other shows. Or all the other shows.
Bryant
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)2. I think they did the right thing -
"But sometimes national politics is the hottest topic, and some argue that media cant be held to a diversity standard when women and people of color are so drastically underrepresented in relevant spokesperson and leadership positions. Hayes acknowledges that, for shows like Meet the Press, theres probably something to that excuse. But most news outlets arent only talking to senators and CEOs. Theres a wide range of perspectives that can be brought to bear on any number of political issues. And, without a quota, its easy to default to the same handful of big names. "
I don't think avg Americans get their voices heard in the media enough. It all reminds me of the bubble the rw'ers lived in last election.
They have ceo's on - but the people most affected by them are not given any time.
From the poor, to the disabled, to pretty much everyone outside a small bubble. We keep telling them when they are about to do something totally stupid how dumb it is, but get ignored and no media --- from Iraq to financial reform, etc, it seemed like many saw the idiocy and called it out but no one wanted to talk to such people because - as they try to note above us folks aren't in congress/leadership positions and therefore thing we don't know jack.
I don't think avg Americans get their voices heard in the media enough. It all reminds me of the bubble the rw'ers lived in last election.
They have ceo's on - but the people most affected by them are not given any time.
From the poor, to the disabled, to pretty much everyone outside a small bubble. We keep telling them when they are about to do something totally stupid how dumb it is, but get ignored and no media --- from Iraq to financial reform, etc, it seemed like many saw the idiocy and called it out but no one wanted to talk to such people because - as they try to note above us folks aren't in congress/leadership positions and therefore thing we don't know jack.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)3. kick (nt)