Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 07:19 PM Apr 2013

White House plays down threat of imminent North Korea attack

White House plays down threat of imminent North Korea attack

US seeks to lower temperature of Korea crisis by stressing 'we are not seeing large-scale military mobilisation' from Pyongyang

Ed Pilkington in New York and Justin McCurry in Seoul

The White House sought to lower the temperature of the North Korea crisis on Monday, pointing out that despite Pyongyang's verbal threats to retaliate with force against the imposition of UN sanctions there were no signs of any troop movements that would suggest imminent military action.

The Obama administration adopted a note of muted concern, in contrast to the increasingly shrill language emanating from both North and South Korea in recent days. At a White House press conference, President Obama's spokesman Jay Carney stressed that though the US was continuing to monitor the situation diligently, "we are not seeing large-scale military mobilisation and repositioning of [North Korean] forces".

Pyongyang's aggressive stance was nothing new, Carney said. "This pattern of bellicose rhetoric is not new. It is familiar, we take it very seriously and we take prudent measures in response to it, but it is consistent with past behaviour."

Carney made clear that the US posture was designed with both Koreas firmly in mind. While Obama wanted to show the North Korean regime that its provocative behaviour "only isolates them further", the administration was also applying pressure on Seoul to dissuade it from taking any unilateral action.

- more -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/01/white-house-plays-down-north-korea-attack

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House plays down threat of imminent North Korea attack (Original Post) ProSense Apr 2013 OP
But...but.... zappaman Apr 2013 #1
Of course you should trust a person posting on the Intertubes Rex Apr 2013 #2
You can't post anything on the internet LeftofObama Apr 2013 #5
HAHAHAHAHA! Rex Apr 2013 #6
That woman said it in that car insurance commercial. LeftofObama Apr 2013 #8
Hehehehe... Rex Apr 2013 #9
Well, in the case of Iraq - I think trusting people on the net was wiser The Straight Story Apr 2013 #12
Trusting your own eyes was much more informative. Rex Apr 2013 #16
It's an ProSense Apr 2013 #3
No one wants war zappaman Apr 2013 #4
Most people do not, but ProSense Apr 2013 #13
True. zappaman Apr 2013 #14
It's possible to worry about it happening and know it isn't happening right now at the same time. Posteritatis Apr 2013 #20
Talking trash tends to increase the odds of getting punched in the mouth. gordianot Apr 2013 #7
The usual red flag sarisataka Apr 2013 #10
I think NK basically RickRolled the media in the West. Starry Messenger Apr 2013 #11
That, or Kim Jong Un scored a bootleg copy of the film, The Mouse that Roared Brother Buzz Apr 2013 #15
Or watched those silly videos everyone was posting a couple of weeks ago Starry Messenger Apr 2013 #17
It's weird. n/t ProSense Apr 2013 #21
North Korea is full of it and just wants food and supplies. Dash87 Apr 2013 #18
Don't post stuff like this. It upsets the "Obama is a warmonger" crowd. nt Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #19

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
1. But...but....
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 07:22 PM
Apr 2013

I've read easily a dozen threads (admittedly most from one poster) about how war is imminent!

Who should I trust on this???

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
2. Of course you should trust a person posting on the Intertubes
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 07:28 PM
Apr 2013

before trusting the Feds! Did you know that some people that post on the Intertubes are NEVA wrong?!? NEVA, EVA!

LeftofObama

(4,243 posts)
8. That woman said it in that car insurance commercial.
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 08:01 PM
Apr 2013

Then she says that she met her date on the internet and he's a French model. The guy (French model) is just some guy that looks like he lives in his mom's basement and the only french he knows is "Bon Jour".

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. It's an
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 07:35 PM
Apr 2013

epidemic, starting with the media. There seems to be so many people fanning the flames of war it's like they either want war, want Obama to start a war or want people to believe Obama is looking for ways to start a war.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
4. No one wants war
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 07:37 PM
Apr 2013

but some people wish for bad things in life so others can feel as miserable as they are.

This NK bullshit is just that...bullshit.
They are just looking for attention as usual.

But that won't stop Chicken Littles for making OP after OP about this non-event.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
13. Most people do not, but
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 08:14 PM
Apr 2013

you have to admit that NK's rhetoric is exciting John Bolton and the neocons.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
20. It's possible to worry about it happening and know it isn't happening right now at the same time.
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 08:26 PM
Apr 2013

I'll start getting scared when I hear of North Korean troop movements or suicidally stupid things like actually trying to fuel or deploy missiles in this climate, but the fact that those haven't happened yet doesn't mean the brinksmanship isn't alarming.

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
7. Talking trash tends to increase the odds of getting punched in the mouth.
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 07:58 PM
Apr 2013

No one should doubt even the North Koreans would not announce the date of a sneak military attack. In this day it is really hard to hide intentions. Problem would be an escalating incident with escalating retaliation from both sides The much vaunted North Korean nuclear arsenal lacks a delivery system. North Korea as with American Republicans have an endless supply of stupid. Immanent probably not, possible yes.

sarisataka

(18,627 posts)
10. The usual red flag
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 08:09 PM
Apr 2013

newly announced 'training maneuvers' combined with 'routine re-positioning of units'. It allows a country to put a large portion of its military in motion and concentrate forces under plausible circumstances.
It can be difficult to tell if the cover story is true or a sham, if done correctly allowing strategic surprise and perhaps even tactical.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
17. Or watched those silly videos everyone was posting a couple of weeks ago
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 08:23 PM
Apr 2013

that gave fake voiceovers in English of supposed views of NK of Western society. Several people here thought they were real too. NK has internet now, they could be trolling! lol

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House plays down th...