General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWant to know how far back the Republicans want to take the country?
Paul Begala has the answer in this editorial:
Jurassic Republicans
Can the GOP escape from 1955?
Mitt Romney lost in part because his was a vision of Father Knows Best America in a time of Modern Family. Romney, by all accounts a devoted family man, could not seem to wrap his mind around the reality that families today come in a vast variety of configurations. His views on gay rights, womens rights, and immigration (on which even Newt Gingrich accused him of wanting to divide families by deporting grandmothers who have lived here for decades) seemed hopelessly out of touch rather than charmingly retro. Meanwhile, Barack Obama cruised to reelection on a one-word slogan: Forward.
The Republican National Committee has, commendably, performed an autopsy on the carcass of its 2012 campaign. To its credit, the GOP seems to recognize that it doesnt just need to moderate, it needs to modernize. You know a party is in trouble when its celebrities are has-beens like Hank Williams Jr., Charlie Daniels, and Ted Nugent (who, to be fair, had a big hitin 1977). As the authors of the GOP report put it: At our core, Republicans have comfortably remained the Party of Reagan without figuring out what comes next. Ronald Reagan is a Republican hero and role model who was first elected 33 years agomeaning no one under the age of 51 today was old enough to vote for Reagan when he first ran for President. Our Party knows how to appeal to older voters, but we have lost our way with younger ones. We sound increasingly out of touch.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/03/25/can-the-gop-escape-from-1955.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+newsweek%2FTopNews+%28Newsweek+-+Latest+Stories%29&utm_content=My+MSN
So now we know.
savebigbird
(417 posts)1955 would be terrifying!
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)the one who started the trickle down effect that has hurt people.
liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)or decision.
The powers in the right have chosen to make him their idol and the media has followed faithfully.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)true destruction of Reagan that liberalism is experiencing today because of him. He wasn't a mean man as a person. He was just a terrible president. Hell he couldn't even get elected today.
Freddie
(9,257 posts)Can be traced back to St. Ronnie; the decline of unions, "trickle down fairy dust" and the unholy alliance of the GOP and the Religious Right (and the unending assault on women's rights) to name a few.
A few years ago my town built a new street and the town council voted to name it Ronald Reagan Drive. Puke.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)constant reminder.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Shortly before the civil war that they'd like to repeat.