Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two Questions (Original Post) H2O Man Mar 2013 OP
For all his faults, Chavez worked to improve the lot for the poorest among his people.... hlthe2b Mar 2013 #1
mr chavez cared for the poor, mr cheney nurtured the war spanone Mar 2013 #8
My dear H20 Man... CaliforniaPeggy Mar 2013 #2
Chaves without a doubt. And of course Cheney hated Chavez, which is not surprising! sabrina 1 Mar 2013 #3
No brainer, Hugo Chavez by a long shot. Cleita Mar 2013 #4
Hugo Chavez el_bryanto Mar 2013 #5
Are you kidding? Rex Mar 2013 #6
I was thinking of Christian saints the other day rurallib Mar 2013 #7
Cheney likes to kill animals, so I doubt he has a dog he liked. Cleita Mar 2013 #9
Hugo Chavez, of course. RebelOne Mar 2013 #10
Who gave free and comprehensive healthcare to everyone? jsr Mar 2013 #11
Interesting answers H2O Man Mar 2013 #12
Well all I know is that Cheney mmonk Mar 2013 #13
Harder to answer than one might think. malthaussen Mar 2013 #14
For the fun of it. H2O Man Mar 2013 #18
To quote Linus van Pelt: malthaussen Mar 2013 #19
Two Answers W_HAMILTON Mar 2013 #15
Chavez. davidthegnome Mar 2013 #16
Easy JonLP24 Mar 2013 #17

hlthe2b

(102,132 posts)
1. For all his faults, Chavez worked to improve the lot for the poorest among his people....
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 03:56 PM
Mar 2013

and he even acted to help out the impoverished needing heating oil in the US and fuel in the Caribbean.

Cheney worked to improve the lot of Dick Cheney and a very tiny group of his most evil "friends", American people be damned. His lies devastated the lives and resources of countless Americans sent to fight an unnecessary war in Iraq and has added greatly to our financial difficulties of today.

I'd find it hard to view Cheney as an "honorable" anything. Chavez is far more the complex individual in my mind.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,525 posts)
2. My dear H20 Man...
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 03:58 PM
Mar 2013

Hugo Chavez was the more honorable man.

Why?

Even though Chavez certainly did dishonorable things, there is no way I would say Cheney was more honorable than he.

NO WAY.



Cleita

(75,480 posts)
4. No brainer, Hugo Chavez by a long shot.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 04:08 PM
Mar 2013

Hugo tried to make his country prosperous and equal for all. Cheney destroyed what was good in this country to line his pockets and that of his cronies.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
5. Hugo Chavez
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 04:12 PM
Mar 2013

He had a mixed but largely positive record. Obviously he had some problems as well, including some things I really didn't like in the free speech area.

Then again, who doesn't look good compared to Dick Cheney? Comparing him to Obama might give a more interesting context for discussion.

Bryant

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
6. Are you kidding?
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 04:14 PM
Mar 2013

One tried to have the other 'ousted'. A few times.

Dick Cheney is the worst unofficial president we've ever had.

rurallib

(62,386 posts)
7. I was thinking of Christian saints the other day
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 04:16 PM
Mar 2013

and thought even the most holy had good points and bad points.
With Cheney there must be SOME good points. They are simply quite hard to find.
Maybe he had a dog he liked.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. Cheney likes to kill animals, so I doubt he has a dog he liked.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:05 PM
Mar 2013

The one good point I could think about him is that he accepted his gay daughter as she was. He did not try to change her nor did he disown her. That's the only good thing I can think of about him.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
10. Hugo Chavez, of course.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:08 PM
Mar 2013

Why? Even Hitler or Stalin would have been more honorable leaders than Dick Cheney.

jsr

(7,712 posts)
11. Who gave free and comprehensive healthcare to everyone?
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:09 PM
Mar 2013

And who is getting free and comprehensive healthcare while denying it to everyone?

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
13. Well all I know is that Cheney
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:25 PM
Mar 2013

was a lying sociopath in office. I do not know how much Chavez lied or was dishonest. I do know the US tried to whip up opposition to overthrow him for economic gain for multi-national corporations. But that is the history of our country and the nations to our south.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
14. Harder to answer than one might think.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 05:32 PM
Mar 2013

Since I know neither man personally, it is difficult to assess them in terms of personal honor. Obviously, as politicians they both would lie, cheat, and steal to advance their agendas, so the only question there would be to whom, and how often. Given the fallout of Mr Cheney's lying, cheating, and stealing as contrasted with the fallout of Mr Chavez's, if we wish to equate "honor" with some Millsean estimate of "the greatest good for the greatest number," then Mr Chavez wins that one hands down.

Ultimately, that is how I would have to call it, under a very specific notion of political "honor" which seeks to evaluate the question "who benefits?" Mr Chavez robbed from the rich to give to the poor, and Mr Cheney robbed from the poor to give to the rich, and waged wars to do so even more. As I am of the poor and not the rich, naturally Mr Chavez seems the more honorable man.

Certainly Mr Chavez had problems typical of many rulers of Latin American countries: poverty, colonialism, militarism, ethnic inequality... the list goes on. And certainly he ruled a country in a region where coups and instability are the rule rather than the exception, and thus resorted to quite a lot of repression here and there in order to keep the boat afloat. In the context of a vision of ideal democracy, that sucks. In the context of regional history, more-or-less par for the course. Whereas Mr Cheney was privileged to rule in a political climate of stability and traditional freedom, and betrayed many of the principles of the constitution he swore to protect and defend to further his agenda. In that respect, I think he may be evaluated as rather more dishonorable than otherwise. And in light of the fact that he used every trick in the book to avoid serving his own country in time of war, and then 40 years later sent the rising generation into an endless bloodletting, I think his honor is tarnished even more.

In sum, while it is difficult to find in those actions of Mr Chavez of which I am aware any particular taint of unusual dishonor for his position, in the case of Mr Cheney, such taints are prominent. Now answer me one: why do you ask?

-- Mal

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
19. To quote Linus van Pelt:
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 01:56 PM
Mar 2013

"In order to find out."

I wondered why you had chosen such an... odd juxtaposition of characters to compare. It's kind of like comparing Castro and Nixon.

Hmmm, come to think of it, asking that question about Castro and Kennedy might be pretty fun, too!

Oh, and congratulations!

-- Mal

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
16. Chavez.
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 07:13 PM
Mar 2013

Why? For simple reasons, when it comes right down to it. He stood up to the lying crooks known as Bush and Cheney. He mocked Fox news, he helped American families heat their homes. Cheney was only ever really interested in one thing - promoting the neocon agenda and making more money - okay, I guess that's two things, but you get the point.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
17. Easy
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 07:16 PM
Mar 2013

Hugo

For one, he didn't transfer millions of taxpayer funds to enrich himself and companies such as Haliburton.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two Questions