General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm sure someone has already commented on this, but I'm still steaming.
I heard CNN talking about how Kamala Harris is seen as "too ambitious." Ok.... Think what one will about Kamala-- Love her or hate her or whatever. . . But when the FUCK is this ever said about a man? Furthermore, just WHO is saying Kamala is too ambitious? Talking heads on TV just blather on about it, and before we know it, everybody is repeating it. Furthermore, who the fuck cares if she's ambitious?
And lastly, what gets me even more is that I hear shit like this from the supposed "liberal" media outlets. . . Fuxx News lies and makes up false facts, but we can blame MSNBC (usually) for the self-inflicted damage, although it was CNN today. Makes me sick.
These kinds of statements make me think of Pussy-Grabber when he starts flailing and says, "I've heard people say. . ." Or "Somebody told me. . ." This is the SAME formula, "People are saying that Kamala is too ambitious." I call it bullshit.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,063 posts)MLAA
(17,165 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)Again, I may be totally wrong.
Turbineguy
(37,212 posts)that anything negative I hear about Biden, the potential VP, or any Democrat is coming from the Russians.
brooklynite
(93,873 posts)Someone ON CNN talks. It would be helpful to know who talked to evaluate whether I should care or not.
BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)Ms. Toad
(33,915 posts)but here's an article about it: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/29/biden-allies-move-to-stop-kamala-harris-from-becoming-vice-president.html
crickets
(25,896 posts)These 'concerned' men are telling us much more about themselves and how their own minds work than about Kamala Harris and her suitability as VP.
Bev54
(9,963 posts)was talking about this very thing, I think this morning but in the same way you are talking about it, how it is never said about a man, only a woman and how the BS needs to stop.
MLAA
(17,165 posts)I_UndergroundPanther
(12,452 posts)Assholes who are sexist ego trippers gonna resent someone who's a better person than they are, especially if they are a woman.
Fuck em and thier beliefs.
Cnn should know better but we got reporters sucking by repeating right wing bullshit like this.
redstatebluegirl
(12,264 posts)42bambi
(1,753 posts)too ambitious. CNN, really? Kamala wouldn't be where she is today had she not been ambitious!
onetexan
(12,994 posts)Is vetting for VEEP all got there because of their ambition. Seems when it comes to women the word ambition takes an ugly connotation. CNN stirs up alot of BS so i watch msnbc more.
SunSeeker
(51,378 posts)jg10003
(974 posts)Duppers
(28,094 posts)TY.
Archetypist
(218 posts)nt
grantcart
(53,061 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)Srkdqltr
(6,129 posts)I would not want someone running for anything if they are not ambitious. Really a person who is not ambitious would not do all the work to run. Ambition is necessary.
cstanleytech
(26,082 posts)way because being ambitious is a good thing imo.
caraher
(6,276 posts)Nobody runs for president who is not "ambitious." Utter nonsense.
Illumination
(2,458 posts)out of the pervy fake "pres.'s" nasty mouth!
quickesst
(6,280 posts)There is ambition for the sake of furthering one's own fortune, and then there is ambition for the purpose of elevating everyone's fortune along with their own.
I have my own opinion which category each of the possible choices fall into.
Quote:
"Talking heads on TV just blather on about it, and before we know it, everybody is repeating it."
I'm positive there are more people on the Democratic side who can form their own opinion of character based upon personal observation. We are nothing like the lemmings of Faux News and trump.
PatrickforO
(14,516 posts)And the 'too ambitious' thing? Pure sexism.
I do have to say, though, that my first choice would be Rice.
But Harris would be just fine.
OneBro
(1,159 posts)By Faux Gnus, of course. Its just the new, less blatantly racist way of calling a black person uppity. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/will-obamas-real-legacy-be-his-overwhelming-empty-ambition
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Do you ever notice it's only people of color and women who are described as "too ambitious"? Unfortunately, she is both so she's getting the double-whammy of prejudice and judgment.
Her ambition, her confidence and her intelligence are what makes her such a powerful, charismatic presence in the first place and I think it's also the same reason that some people - the OTHER people - are afraid of her.
I think she's inspiring and impressive and would make a great addition to Joe's team.
Cha
(295,929 posts)that about idiots like joni phony ehrnst?
dchill
(38,324 posts)Mama always used to say.
Response to BigDemVoter (Original post)
Post removed
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,483 posts)and to maintain audience without considering full context or social implications.
A similar annoying habit exists with most all outlets that can't resist plastering large color photos of tRump on every single headline page that are highly offensive to me.
And yes, sexism and racism is pervasive in virtually all major news outlets around the globe, mostly in subtle ways but sometimes blatantly obvious.
KY.............
lame54
(35,141 posts)betsuni
(25,137 posts)Too ambitious, unlikeable, over-prepared, too this and not enough that. Everything has a diabolical negative motivation. A woman doing the job she was hired to do: conspiracy theories of Kamala Harris putting everyone in jail and Hillary Clinton as hawkish warmonger. Fucking ridiculous. Is this a mommy complex or what.
Today I watched an old panel discussion from the primaries and someone said, out of the blue, as if it had anything to do with anything they were discussing, "Amy Klobuchar threw a stapler at someone."