Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
Sun Aug 9, 2020, 06:21 PM Aug 2020

National Review: Why Trump's Losing

Trump is thin-skinned, self-obsessed, small-minded, intellectually lazy, and ill-disciplined. These never seemed to be great qualities in a chief executive, but they have caught up with Trump over the last six months in particular. They have played into his poor handling of the coronavirus crisis and the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd. When times became more serious, he remained as unserious as ever.

COVID has been the main factor worsening his political condition. The damage didn’t register in the polls at first. At the end of March and beginning of April, polling had his handling of the crisis in positive territory, a kind of rally-around-the-flag effect. But the effect was smaller and shorter-lived for him than it was for other officials, in the states and abroad. As of early August, the average of the polling at the website FiveThirtyEight has his rating on the crisis at 58 percent disapprove and 38 percent approve. This is a flashing red light given that COVID is the most important issue to voters at the moment, a rare instance when the economy isn’t the top issue in a presidential election.

Of course, none of Trump’s critics predicted that a deadly and economy-flattening contagion would kneecap him in an election year. But his inability to respond adequately to the crisis is the kind of thing that they had in mind when they warned that his character traits were unsuited to the presidency.

Particularly in the circumstances of a novel pandemic, the president needs a process that brings him relevant information, structures his deliberation, allows him to adapt to new developments and correct mistakes, and guides the rest of the government in executing his decisions. And he must act in concert with Congress, governors, public-health experts, business leaders, and others, all of whom have their own roles to play. Nobody could perform this job perfectly.

What we have under Trump is very nearly the mirror image of this ideal. He relies on gut instinct and gets his information from what he happens to see on television or hears from friends. He is extremely disinclined to acknowledge mistakes, process bad news, or think beyond the news cycle. The structure his staff has built around him is designed more to manage his ego and shield him from bad news than to yield wise decisions. His understanding of the relationship between the president and other political actors is rudimentary, causing him to alternate between passivity and assertions of total control.

https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2020/08/24/why-trumps-losing/

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TommyCelt

(838 posts)
7. NR
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 12:08 PM
Aug 2020

There are a number of trumpeters at National Review, but there is a significant minority of writers that can NOT stand trump. They know the difference between a conservative (which trump is NOT) and a blatant nationalist.

I'd lay money that these folks make up for more than a little funding for The Lincoln Project.

TommyCelt

(838 posts)
13. If I remember correctly...
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 05:00 PM
Aug 2020

At NR there was at least one "Never Trumper" who identified as such back in 2016 as well

herding cats

(19,563 posts)
2. Trump solidified the death of expertise within the GOP.
Sun Aug 9, 2020, 07:27 PM
Aug 2020

It's painfully obvious the impact that's had on us during Covid.

erronis

(15,241 posts)
11. Agree. He's just the spoiled ketchup on the poison budger.
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 04:25 PM
Aug 2020

He's there to deflect and fart and make an ass of himself (all the while making the US the laughing-stock of the world.)

He doesn't have a clue about what he's being told to do.

Perfect pick as a Nero stand-in.

NNadir

(33,512 posts)
5. Of course, even knowing and acknowledging these truths...
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 12:02 PM
Aug 2020

...it's not like the National Review has either the courage or patriotism to endorse Biden.

simplesimon

(13 posts)
6. I'm tempted to be thankful for...
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 12:07 PM
Aug 2020

those WH staffers who reportedly try to manage his temper and reactions, I suppose, by editing much of the news he gets. I'd just as soon not think about what he'd be like if he was getting mostly unvarnished truth.

MyOwnPeace

(16,925 posts)
8. From what we see and hear about him..........
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 12:20 PM
Aug 2020

you make a very good point. Who knows what that idiot would do if he really knew what is going on!

Oh, and welcome to DU!!!!

kiri

(794 posts)
19. he is too ignorant to dream up these schemes
Tue Aug 11, 2020, 10:21 AM
Aug 2020

Trumpino is far too ignorant to dream up these schemes to destroy the Post Office, to destroy Social Security and ObamaCare, environmental rules, etc. all by himself.

His Hannity-picked 'staff' feed him this stuff, and he drinks it in.

Grins

(7,212 posts)
10. Small correction, Mr. Rich Lowry, Mr. Ponnuru...
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 03:56 PM
Aug 2020

Nope.

"...his inability to respond adequately to the crisis is the kind of thing that they had in mind."

That's not exactly correct. His sane critics were not just concerned about an "economy-flattening contagion". What Lowry and Ponnuru should have written is:

"...his inability to respond adequately to ANY crisis is the kind of thing that they had in mind.."

And not just Trump's critics, so also his opposing candidate:

"Just imagine Donald Trump in the Oval Office facing a real crisis. We can’t afford that kind of risk." - Hillary Clinton, 08 August 2016.

So far - we still can't!

captain queeg

(10,170 posts)
15. That is exactly right. I hope nothing else serious happens in the next few months.
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 10:12 PM
Aug 2020

Covid is bad enough. How about a major earthquake or a cat 5 hurricane hitting the mainland?

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
12. National Review has decided they don't like Trump again?
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 04:37 PM
Aug 2020

National Review came out in February 2016 with an issue titled simply "Against Trump," laying down a marker that caused some people to think that the conservative magazine might be a persistent thorn in Trump's side should his campaign prevail against the Republican field. NR fell in line soon enough, overpowered by Trump's manly manliness. By January 2020, the magazine had surrendered to Trumpism almost completely:

https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2020/01/27/never-trump-revisited/

Now, all of the Trump faults they've seen and catalogued so clearly seem to surprise them, and they don't like Trump again. It's just so sad to see these two crazy kids falling out like this. Perhaps some day soon they'll realize that they really love each other and get back together.

Barf.

Sloumeau

(2,657 posts)
14. This is one of the exceedingly rare decent articles from National Review.
Mon Aug 10, 2020, 08:28 PM
Aug 2020

It seems like only when Republicans are close to losing, or actually lose, as in 2012, do Republicans ever get honest with themselves.

In 2012, the Republican part commissioned a post mortem study about why they lost against Obama. Among other things, the post mortem said that Republicans should reach out to Hispanic voters. Republicans summarily rejected that advice and instead nominated Super-Racist Trump, who only managed to win by some union leaning white voters in the industrial midwest that he would magically bring jobs back from China (which of course was a lie).

Roc2020

(1,615 posts)
20. strategy and bet was hope to hope that
Tue Aug 11, 2020, 12:03 PM
Aug 2020

his presidency went somewhat like Clinton's. Clinton only had the baltic war and that was in europe. the bet came up snake eyes...
CV-19.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»National Review: Why Trum...