Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
Sat Apr 18, 2020, 03:05 AM Apr 2020

Sometimes more information can be a problem.

When we first heard about covid19, the skinny on it was this:

“Deadly to older folks with compromised health”.

That meant that MANY super-rich older folks seemed to be the target. These are the people who get catapulted to the top of transplant lists, and have the best that money can buy when it comes to hospitals and specialists.

There was real cause for concern. The whole issue was all about protecting our elders. We were eager to stay at home, cut off contact.

Anything to protect Grandma and Grandpa, or CEOS. For days there were always pics of genteel/frail (white) elders on tv day and night.

BUT it wasn’t long before more information came out that narrowed the “target” population.

Poor people are at greater risk because of the density of living conditions, mostly in larger cities (Usually Democratic party voters live there).

They are also more at risk because of their health issues. Decades of poor health care due to the fact that most poor people work really shitty jobs with no sick leave or health insurance. These people rely on the ER for health care, and cannot pay for their care.

Many poor folks are chronically unemployed, or homeless. This means that their basic food supply is laden with fats/sugars and is often stuff that’s bought at bodegas/dollar stores and is usually “processed” to the nth degree. Obesity, heart disease, high blood pressure, asthma, and diabetes are well known to poor people.

These are not “personal choices”. They are financial consequences of where and how they have to live (polluted areas with bad air, bad water, mold, toxic substances in the buildings, etc).

The elder poor who are in nursing homes are usually in homes that are Medicaid-supported. These places are often staffed with younger poor folks who make substandard wages, are extremely overworked, and often live in densely populated living conditions.


Elder not-so-poor are not immune even though they can afford resort style retirement homes, because the staff is still often poor younger folks, since the owners of these facilities are always watching “the bottom line”.

Minorities are often a large part of the poor faction. Hispanics, documented or undocumented, and African Americans soon became the media focus.

With that new focus, every interviewer was immediately putting any democrat on the air in the hot seat with questions about why these folks were not a part of the $1200 scheme and how they (Dems) would shape future legislation to see that these people got their fair shake.. and of course why they were disproportionately affected by the virus..(always asked with pretend naivete)

It was not a very far leap before prisoners became the focus.

So in a few weeks, the story about the virus went from being a bad old invisible enemy set on killing Granny & Gramps, to an inevitable force of nature that seemed to be preying on “illegals, non-whites, lazy poor folks, and prisoners”.

I’ve understood how republicans think for a very long time now, and I knew where this was heading. Remember after Katrina, when some congressman said that Katrina had accomplished what “they” had been trying to do for a very long time?

Republicans are just fine with the virus running wild.
Apparently, Trump can not only shoot someone on 5th Avenue, but he can also exterminate tens of thousands of people, and his crew will love him all the more.

This is why he does not want to waste money and effort on testing. He needs for the virus to do his party’s work, and if a few doctors and nurses, or some celebs die, he’s ok with that.

He can now just blame the governors.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sometimes more information can be a problem. (Original Post) SoCalDem Apr 2020 OP
Spot on. 5X Apr 2020 #1
The truly scary thing is how many people have health issues. PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2020 #2
What better way for Republicans to cut entitlements? sop Apr 2020 #3
I agree with you but Midnightwalk Apr 2020 #4
Is there any correlation between isolation and Alzheimers? kentuck Apr 2020 #5
actually isolation is the norm for me SoCalDem Apr 2020 #6
I understand. kentuck Apr 2020 #7

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,750 posts)
2. The truly scary thing is how many people have health issues.
Sat Apr 18, 2020, 03:25 AM
Apr 2020

It's a huge percentage. Obesity. Diabetes. Asthma. Various auto-immune diseases.

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
4. I agree with you but
Sat Apr 18, 2020, 05:52 AM
Apr 2020

There’s a parallel force at work.

Chaos is profitable. How much of the 2 trillion dollar stimulus went to the wealthy. The contracts to unqualified distributors for medical equipment. Leveraging the market.

A second wave will be profitable as well.

I think both reasons are in play and I hate them for both reasons.

kentuck

(110,950 posts)
5. Is there any correlation between isolation and Alzheimers?
Sat Apr 18, 2020, 05:57 AM
Apr 2020

Has anyone noticed anything in their personal lives?

Asking for a friend.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
6. actually isolation is the norm for me
Sat Apr 18, 2020, 06:30 AM
Apr 2020

Since my husband died, it's just me and my 2 kitties and they're lousy conversationalists.

The irony is that I finally have my huge house, and I'm alone..not really lonely...just alone

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sometimes more informatio...