General Discussion

jls4561

(1,253 posts) Fri Apr 3, 2020, 08:20 PM Apr 2020

How come tRump has no problem with the price of needed medical supplies increasing dramatically but

is concerned about oil prices dropping?

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How come tRump has no problem with the price of needed medical supplies increasing dramatically but (Original Post) jls4561 Apr 2020 OP

Probably has stock in the oil cos. n/t napi21 Apr 2020 #1

Got you thinking about the latest diversion from COVID. jls4561 Apr 2020 #2

Money. Trump surely has mega oil stocks in his investment procon Apr 2020 #3

Low oil prices hurt Putin. Flaleftist Apr 2020 #4

Because Jared is selling med eqpt overseas! SheltieLover Apr 2020 #5

The oil companies no longer have cash to throw at his Progressive dog Apr 2020 #6

napi21

(45,806 posts)

1. Probably has stock in the oil cos. n/t

Reply to jls4561 (Original post)

Fri Apr 3, 2020, 08:22 PM

Apr 2020

jls4561

(1,253 posts)

2. Got you thinking about the latest diversion from COVID.

Reply to napi21 (Reply #1)

Fri Apr 3, 2020, 08:24 PM

Apr 2020

That was the plan all along.

procon

(15,805 posts)

3. Money. Trump surely has mega oil stocks in his investment

Reply to jls4561 (Original post)

Fri Apr 3, 2020, 08:27 PM

Apr 2020

portfolio, not so much in companies that helped other people not named Trump.

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)

4. Low oil prices hurt Putin.

Reply to jls4561 (Original post)

Fri Apr 3, 2020, 08:29 PM

Apr 2020

SheltieLover

(57,073 posts)

5. Because Jared is selling med eqpt overseas!

Reply to jls4561 (Original post)

Fri Apr 3, 2020, 08:39 PM

Apr 2020

See Propublica article about ventilators! Machines that our tax $ paid to develop & build! 🤬

Progressive dog

(6,898 posts)

6. The oil companies no longer have cash to throw at his

Reply to jls4561 (Original post)

Fri Apr 3, 2020, 08:49 PM

Apr 2020

businesses or his campaign. He needs money from the black market pricing on medical supplies to make up for that lost cash.

Reply to this discussion