Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

H2O Man

(73,506 posts)
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 09:29 PM Jan 2019

Speaking of BuzzFeed

One of my closest associates told me about the BuzzFeed article minutes after it was published. I said, “That makes sense.” He said, “Be careful on this one.” I said that they had broke important stories on the Trump crime family. He agreed, and noted they have some outstanding journalists working for them. So I asked what the problem was? He said to look closely at two things: first, the article hinted that there were sources from the Mueller team, and second, there is a significant difference between Trump personally telling Cohen to lie, and someone like Jared telling Cohen that Trump wanted him to lie. Or, possibly telling Cohen to inform others in the White House that he would testify that the Trump Tower Moscow business ended in January,so that they would parrot the same lie.

After discussing some related issues, I thought I should pen a quick essay for this forum. I decided to write it after training my two fighters for their January 27 bouts in the Golden Gloves. However, being old, tired, and forgetful, I did not. I want to be clear here: I had originally believed the report was likely accurate, but considered passing on another person's advice. It wasn't something that I came up with myself.

Let's look at a few issues objectively. I know that good people can have different views that they feel very strongly about. But let's put feelings and emotions to the side. There are no sources from the Mueller Team passing secrets to any journalist. There may be sources who work, or have worked, with FBI investigators on other cases, and they may believe what they told the two journalists. Or the journalists may have misunderstood what they said. Or the sources may have fed them misinformation, especially if the sources are connected to a small group of active and retired investigators from the NYC area.

It is also legitimate to look closely at one or both of the journalists. In this case, although it was more than a decade ago, one of them engaged in a series of actions that discredited him. However, it is also important to remember that people can and do learn from mistakes and change. Not everyone does, of course …..something Rubin Carter said to me years ago comes to mind: “Wise people learn from others' mistakes. Most of us have to learn from our own. And fools? Fools never learn.”

Both sources and reporters can be accurate 95% of the time. That's important. But that other 5% is important, too. One should consider if these are honest mistakes, careless errors, seemingly correct conclusions on realistic theories, or purposeful misleading efforts to discredit an individual, group or organization, or movement. Everyone has the right to their own opinion on this. I see no need to express my own at this time.

However, I would like to say that we are at a point in this country where there is benefits found in removing emotion to the extent possible, and taking an objective look at events as they unfold. Try to think of various options that may be involved. This will help us to realize that, despite a few more bumps in the road up ahead, the Trump presidency is in shambles, and will soon come to an abrupt end.

Peace,
H2O Man

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Speaking of BuzzFeed (Original Post) H2O Man Jan 2019 OP
Raise a glass to abrupt ends. woofless Jan 2019 #1
Right! H2O Man Jan 2019 #2
Lighting up what? BannonsLiver Jan 2019 #11
Kick dalton99a Jan 2019 #3
I agree with you malaise Jan 2019 #4
Once again... Liberal Jesus Freak Jan 2019 #5
I guess the important thing to remember here is that coeur_de_lion Jan 2019 #6
. Fuzzpope Jan 2019 #7
I am wondering if their sources Mr.Bill Jan 2019 #8
They said law enforcement officials with knowledge of the investigation. marylandblue Jan 2019 #10
K&R good point! Claiming that Mueller's team is leaking information discredits the investigation. Jeffersons Ghost Jan 2019 #9
K&R Scurrilous Jan 2019 #12
Glad l was able to read what you wrote. It reminded me to try Enoki33 Jan 2019 #13
Thanks for this. mountain grammy Jan 2019 #14
I doubt Anyone on Mueller's side leaked. Makes sense Mueller's statement is consistent Pepsidog Jan 2019 #15
You are one of the Crown Jewels Of DU. sellitman Jan 2019 #16
K&R suffragette Jan 2019 #17
"So, Michael, Jared and I have been talking," says the Orange One, pnwmom Jan 2019 #18
It was amazing to me how quickly the story was questioned and corrected. kentuck Jan 2019 #19

H2O Man

(73,506 posts)
2. Right!
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 09:38 PM
Jan 2019

(As I don't drink, I'll toast Trump's abrupt end by lighting up. Old men need to listen to their doctors about dealing with pains!)

coeur_de_lion

(3,676 posts)
6. I guess the important thing to remember here is that
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 09:59 PM
Jan 2019

Last edited Sun Jan 20, 2019, 11:59 AM - Edit history (1)

Mueller's team does not leak.

The article mentioned a leak or talked about the way Mueller team obtained some evidence in a way that the team recognized never happened.

So I suppose the Mueller team had to say something or else people would keep reporting fake leaks.

While it is almost certainly true that trump directed Cohen to lie, it didn't happen quite the way the article said it did.

Here is a Washington Post article that explains why Mueller's office responded in the way that they did:

[link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/inside-the-mueller-teams-decision-to-dispute-buzzfeeds-explosive-story-on-trump-and-cohen/2019/01/19/d89dba5b-fa0f-445b-9fd3-72f0e911e28d_story.html?utm_term=.2b280e2e3c92|

“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s congressional testimony are not accurate,” he wrote.

People familiar with the matter said the special counsel’s office meant the statement to be a denial of the central theses of the BuzzFeed story — particularly those that referenced what Cohen had told the special counsel, and what evidence the special counsel had gathered.


The Buzzfeed article may have been mostly accurate but the mistakes they made caused an uproar -- that 5% you speak of can drown out the other 95% when we are thisclose to getting rid of Individual 1 for good. Individual 1 will grab at ANYTHING that is even slightly favorable to him.

So I am curious about this paragraph that you wrote:

One should consider if these are honest mistakes, careless errors, seemingly correct conclusions on realistic theories, or purposeful misleading efforts to discredit an individual, group or organization, or movement. Everyone has the right to their own opinion on this. I see no need to express my own at this time.


I really wish you would give us a hint about what you personally believe. Your opinion is valued here.
 

Fuzzpope

(602 posts)
7. .
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 10:49 PM
Jan 2019

Most worthy voice on this entire forum, my personal favorite.

Thanks for this, and all your previous shafts of light piercing this growing black.

Cheers.

Mr.Bill

(24,238 posts)
8. I am wondering if their sources
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 10:51 PM
Jan 2019

might be not people who are working with Mueller, but maybe people who have been questioned by Mueller's team, and they drew a conclusion based on questions that were asked of them.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
10. They said law enforcement officials with knowledge of the investigation.
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 10:57 PM
Jan 2019

I'd say the most likely candidates are in the New York FBI office who may have seen the documents from Cohen's office and are known to leak.

Enoki33

(1,587 posts)
13. Glad l was able to read what you wrote. It reminded me to try
Sat Jan 19, 2019, 11:52 PM
Jan 2019

to maintain objectivity in these emotional times, and that there is a far bigger picture soon to be fully viewed.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
15. I doubt Anyone on Mueller's side leaked. Makes sense Mueller's statement is consistent
Sun Jan 20, 2019, 12:19 AM
Jan 2019

with H20’s reasoning that Trump indirectly through other people spread what he was going to say. But ultimately, Jr. Jared and gang aren’t as smart as they think, and I’m sure they spread the lies through electronic communications that Mueller has.

sellitman

(11,605 posts)
16. You are one of the Crown Jewels Of DU.
Sun Jan 20, 2019, 12:49 AM
Jan 2019

My personal favorite read.

Thank you for the effort and thought behind this and many of your posts. Always thought provoking and informative. We will survive the Trump Mis-administration together.

Cheers,

Kevin

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
18. "So, Michael, Jared and I have been talking," says the Orange One,
Sun Jan 20, 2019, 05:48 AM
Jan 2019

"and we don't remember any discussion of the Moscow Tower after about January or so. So it all ended before the campaign really began."

The Orange One snorts a hit of whatever he snorts. Then he says, "So I know you're going to have to testify. Of course I want you to tell the truth. Just tell the truth and everything will be fine. And let me see whatever written statement you put together. Just run it by me, okay?"

Snort, snort.

"And make sure you give Alan the invoice for your work. Whatever it costs. Thanks, Michael!"

kentuck

(111,052 posts)
19. It was amazing to me how quickly the story was questioned and corrected.
Sun Jan 20, 2019, 08:45 AM
Jan 2019

If we could only get such an effort from Donald Trump's White House.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Speaking of BuzzFeed