Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

150 human animal hybrids grown in UK labs: Embryos have been produced secretively for the past three

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:06 PM
Original message
150 human animal hybrids grown in UK labs: Embryos have been produced secretively for the past three
150 human animal hybrids grown in UK labs: Embryos have been produced secretively for the past three years

Scientists have created more than 150 human-animal hybrid embryos in British laboratories.

The hybrids have been produced secretively over the past three years by researchers looking into possible cures for a wide range of diseases.

The revelation comes just a day after a committee of scientists warned of a nightmare ‘Planet of the Apes’ scenario in which work on human-animal creations goes too far.

..

Figures seen by the Daily Mail show that 155 ‘admixed’ embryos, containing both human and animal genetic material, have been created since the introduction of the 2008 Human Fertilisation Embryology Act.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2017818/Embryos-involving-genes-animals-mixed-humans-produced-secretively-past-years.html#ixzz1T4hMKgsB
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. H.G. Wells was prescient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Doctor Hurt Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. so what?
overhyped nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree with the ethical stance of this woman on the matter:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gives a whole new meaning to the term "Frankenfoods." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Daily Mail?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SoutherDem Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. The problem depends on where we came from
If you are a creationist then it is blasphemy, if you are an evolutionist this my be considered creating combinations which didn't mix on their own.
Not saying all evolutionist would feel this way, but if we all crawled out of the same pond, what is the big deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ..............
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Really?
And this is a reliable source because . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The Daily Mail is often mistaken for a reliable source on DU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. FWIW: The Daily Mail is a RW tabloid with a long history of getting things wrong and making stuff up
It's not a reliable source by any stretch of the imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. For the non-Mail reporting
which actually tells you more about what has already been done, what UK public opinion is, and why this came up (a research body has said we need a framework to take into account future developments), here's Nature:

Regulations proposed for animal–human chimaeras

The increasingly sophisticated blending of different species to create chimaeras is pushing biology into a new ethical dimension. Last year, scientists used new stem-cell technologies to create a mouse with a functioning pancreas composed entirely of rat cells. So might it soon be possible to create a monkey with a brain composed entirely of human neurons? And would it think like a human?

Such an animal might be useful to researchers studying human cognition or human-specific pathogens. But it would be ethically unacceptable and should be banned, argues a government-commissioned report from the UK Academy of Medical Sciences, a body that promotes medical research.

The document, Animals Containing Human Material , says that genetic and stem-cell technologies are now so advanced that the creation of such animals is already on the horizon. But no country has yet devised a broad regulatory framework for the research. The report, released on 22 July, calls for the United Kingdom to take the lead in putting in place specific safeguards.

"We are not proposing a new tier of regulation that will hold up important research," says Robin Lovell-Badge, a developmental biologist at the Medical Research Council's National Institute for Medical Research in London, and a member of the working group that drew up the report. At the same time, he says, "we don't want scientists to cause problems for the future by overstepping the mark of what is publicly acceptable". Unlike the hypothetical monkey with a human brain, many animals containing human material (ACHMs) are likely to advance basic biology and medicine without transgressing ethical boundaries, the report concludes.



http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110721/full/475438a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 30th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC