Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Issa: 'Fast and furious' subpoenas issued soon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 01:54 PM
Original message
Issa: 'Fast and furious' subpoenas issued soon
http://news.yahoo.com/issa-fast-furious-subpoenas-issued-soon-204241306.html

"WASHINGTON (AP) — The chairman of the House oversight committee said Sunday that he could send subpoenas to the Obama administration as soon as this week over weapons lost amid the Mexican drug war."


Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if Obama and his admin will pull a Bush and simply refuse to show up.
Edited on Mon Oct-10-11 01:55 PM by no limit
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PuffedMica Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. President Obama should tell Issa and the Republicans to go pound sand
Whatever is going on in the ATF and the Justice Department should be handled by the Executive Branch. We will come out of this a whole lot better if Democrats repair the damage rather than letting the repukes get mileage from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I disagree.
What it appears is going on here is that we are selling arms to the Sinaloa cartel to undermine the power of the Zetas cartel.

If so, we are supporting the suppliers of the very thing we jail US citizens for selling and using.

This is not an issue to be quietly handled behind the scenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PuffedMica Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I didn't say behind the scenes
What I mean is that Executive Branch needs to repair the damage we have sustained under people appointed by this Administration. The objective of the Republicans is not to correct anything wrong over at the BATF & E, but to center punch our President.

Don't give Issa the pleasure, we should make things right from within.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think the entire issue goes back before the current administration...
I personally would love to see some of that transparency we were all sold a few years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The only difference I see
From all reports the Operation Wide Receiver the intent was to track weapons using RFID devices and surveillance aircraft. The smugglers outfoxed them by driving in circles for the time they figured the aircraft stayed aloft, dashing across the border, then waiting for the batteries in the tracking devices to die. The operation was ended when it was clear it was not working.

BY contrast, Fast and Furious there appears to have been no intent to keep track of weapons when they crossed the border. The ATF quit surveillance once the border was crossed. The Mexican authorities were unable to to follow the bad guys as they were deliberately not informed.

In the first case, I would call that a botched operation and failure was in underestimating the technical savvy of the smugglers. In the second case the operation was ill-conceived to start. It came to the public's attention because street level agents were complaining that they were not being allowed to interdict weapons before they crossed the border and they was no mechanism of any kind to trace the weapons after they had crossed the border.

With any sting operation, the idea is to get a little fish to lead you to a bigger fish. In Operation Wide Receiver they planned to follow the little fish with high tech and got outsmarted.

In Fast and Furious they had no plan to follow the little fish and the high level political hacks that dreamed up the idea have been trying to out dumb each other. After all, without ANY mechanism to track the weapons up the chain of supply anyone with the intelligence of turnip could see it failing to LEAD anyone to the bigger fish. Then what was its real intent? Just send guns to Mexico? One has to wonder when panicked internal memos pop up worrying that one of the "walked" guns may have been used to shoot Congresswoman Giffords.

In that case, why? To pump up numbers of US gun tracings? Arm one cartel against another? Undermine the Mexican government? Corruption? Incompetence? Duplicity? Why would the Agent in Arizona in charge of the operation have back channel communications with the White House staff outside the normal chain of command?

Assuming whoever approved this operation did it with a pure heart but the brain of a flat worm, an admission of "We fucked up. We will fix it," would go a lot better than the lying and the cover-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Callisto32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. +1
Maybe we should call it the "Opaque-a" administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Unfortunately, Congress has the power to investigate.
I just hope to hell they clean house and tie this off fast. The Reps won't give two shits about the facts, it's just going to be used to tar Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Callisto32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Why, exactly, is that unfortunate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Holder agrees with you
He got asked about Fast and Furious at his news conference yesterday, blew it off and walked out.

AG Holder dodges & ignores questions on Fast & Furious

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Callisto32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Let the foxes guard the henhouse...for your party aspirations?
See, this is the kind of shit that is wrong with America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iktomiwicasa Donating Member (942 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. The President...
...should fire Holder and cooperate with an investigation into this cluster fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Holder should be easy to fire.
Holder's defense during the Marc Rich pardon scandal was he didn't read all the stuff before he recommended Clinton pardon the guy.

Holder told Issa he didn't read all the memos that, over a year, briefed him on Fast and Furious.

Clearly, he is either negligent and incompetent in his duties, or he is a liar. The administration would be a lot better off painting him as incompetent, but honest.

If he comes off as a liar, then nothing he says is trustworthy. If nothing he says is trustworthy, who is going to believe him even if he claims he authorized Fast and Furious and President knew nothing about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 31st 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC